'justification' 검색 결과

Use this skill when a statement of applicability already exists and the team wants its exclusions to survive the audit, and asks "review our SoA exclusions", "is this a valid justification", "can we exclude physical security if we are fully remote", "the auditor challenged our not applicable controls", "rewrite our exclusion justifications" or "we outsource it, so it does not apply, right". Tests every excluded control against scope, assets, activities, suppliers, risks and commitments, gives each a keep, rewrite, reverse or ask verdict, and writes a review table plus rewritten justifications for the owner to approve.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Upload Kleros evidence, policies, or metadata to IPFS through a paid gateway. Receive a CID, a content-based file identifier, and a viewing URL. Each request uploads one file and costs $0.01 USDC on Base mainnet.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Upload evidence for a Kleros dispute
• Store MetaEvidence JSON and court policies
• Upload Curate metadata or juror justifications

Translate technical security work into the language of non-security audiences — board, executives, engineering, customer success, customers, legal, procurement, sales. Covers incident communication, post-mortem narrative, audit-findings-for-stakeholders, risk justification, security spend justification, and customer-facing breach disclosure. Use when the user mentions 'security comms,' 'communicate this finding,' 'explain to my boss,' 'board update,' 'executive summary,' 'incident communication,' 'breach notification,' 'customer disclosure,' 'security memo,' 'post-mortem narrative,' 'risk justification,' 'why this matters to the business,' 'translate this finding,' 'stakeholder update,' or has technical security work that needs to land with a non-security audience.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan study sample sizes, estimate statistical power—the chance of detecting an assumed effect—and find the smallest detectable effect. Supports standard tests and simulations for complex designs, with sensitivity analyses and sample size justifications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Estimating participant or sample counts before data collection
• Finding the smallest effect detectable with a fixed sample
• Preparing sample size justifications for grants or protocols

Turn research ideas and literature into a structured funding proposal. Supports KAKENHI and other funding programs, guiding literature positioning, research aims, methods, timelines, and budget justification, with external review to identify weaknesses in the draft.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting a KAKENHI proposal from a research idea
• Explaining gaps relative to literature and funded projects
• Organizing research aims, annual plans, and budget justification

Prepare a ChatGPT Apps submission JSON file by inspecting an MCP server, which exposes tools to AI agents. Generate app details, tool behavior justifications, and test cases, then report review findings and missing output schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Generate a JSON file for a ChatGPT Apps submission
• Check tool annotations against implementation
• Prepare positive and negative review test cases

Use grant budget justification for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage a single security finding — from a scanner, audit, advisory, or report — to a defensible disposition with a mitigation plan, false-positive justification, or accepted-risk writeup. Use when the user mentions 'triage this finding,' 'is this a real vulnerability,' 'mitigation plan,' 'false positive,' 'accept this risk,' 'compensating controls,' 'risk justification,' 'security ticket,' 'CVSS this,' 'should we fix this,' 'disposition,' 'sign off on,' or has a single security finding and needs to decide what to do.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification). Walks a decision tree to the right test and returns reproducible R/Python code and IRB-ready justification text. Analyzing collected data is /analyze-stats.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Building defensible grant budgets — personnel, equipment, indirect costs, and justifications reviewers believe.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan security programs for growing companies by estimating financial risk and prioritizing controls. Produce compliance roadmaps, budget justifications, incident response plans, vendor assessments, and board reports that connect security decisions to business impact.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Justify security budgets with estimated financial losses
• Plan SOC 2 or ISO 27001 compliance work
• Prepare incident coordination and communication plans

Review Slack access requests against Okta role and team information, then prepare narrowly scoped GitHub or AWS IAM permissions. Apply changes only after an eligible person's approval and record the grant, reasoning, approver, and timestamp.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing GitHub repository access requests from Slack
• Preparing AWS IAM permissions for a specific task
• Routing sensitive access requests for additional review

Turn penetration test and red team results into reports for executives and technical teams. Structure findings, explain severity scores and business impact, organize evidence, and document remediation steps and retest plans.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing a final penetration test report
• Rewriting an executive summary for nontechnical readers
• Creating a reusable security reporting template

Draft research funding proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA using agency-specific structures and review criteria. Develop research aims, significance, innovation, methods, milestones, and budget justifications into a proposal aligned with the funding opportunity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Structure a proposal for a specific funding agency
• Draft research aims, significance, and innovation sections
• Align budgets and milestones with the research plan

Draft research funding proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Organize research aims, methods, expected contributions, budgets, and timelines around each agency’s review criteria and submission requirements, including revisions responding to reviewer feedback.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting a proposal for a specific funding agency
• Explaining research significance and societal benefits
• Aligning budget justifications with the research plan

Estimate study sample sizes and statistical power, the chance of detecting a specified effect. Calculate detectable effects for a fixed sample, compare assumptions with power curves, and document adjustments for dropout, multiple comparisons, or clustered observations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Estimate participant or sample counts before data collection
• Find the smallest effect detectable with a fixed sample
• Compare sample requirements across plausible effect sizes

Draft research funding proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Organize research aims, methods, budgets, timelines, and societal benefits around each agency’s application format and review criteria.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting a research funding proposal
• Explaining research significance and innovation
• Preparing budget justifications and timelines

Research-backed evolution advice for your knowledge system. Analyzes health reports, friction patterns, and derivation history to propose specific changes with research justification. Never auto-implements — proposals require your approval.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply plugin knowledge base updates to an existing generated system. Consults the Ars Contexta research graph for methodology improvements, proposes skill upgrades with research justification. Never auto-implements. Triggers on "/upgrade", "upgrade skills", "check for improvements", "update methodology".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

当用户要求写作、重构、审查或润色 NSFC/科研基金申请书的立项依据时使用；不负责研究目标、技术路线或其他章节的正文写作。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

当用户明确要求“写/生成 NSFC 预算说明书”“写预算说明”“生成 budget.tex / budget.pdf”“写国自然预算 justification”时使用。基于用户标书正文或补充材料，输出一份可提交的预算说明书 LaTeX 项目并渲染 `budget.pdf`。若用户未指定工作目录，必须暂停并先要求其指定。⚠️ 不适用：用户只是想了解预算原则；用户仅要预算表数字而不写说明书；或用户是 2026 青年 A/B/C 默认包干制且无需预算说明书的场景。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate professional prior authorization request letters for insurance companies with proper clinical justification and formatting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles justification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.