'lm programming' 검색 결과

健身私教 — 为客户设计、指导和推进个性化训练方案的专业工艺, 有别于团课教练、物理治疗师或运动队教练: (a) 训练方案设计与周期化 (线性 / 波动 / 板块周期化 Bompa & Haff; NSCA《力量训练与体能训练精要》行业圣经; Schoenfeld 肌肥大机制; Helms/Valdez/Morgan 肌肉与力量金字塔; 共轭训练法 Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength 线性渐进 Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization 训练量地标 Israetel); (b) 动作评估与筛查 (FMS 功能性动作筛查 Gray Cook; NASM CEx 纠正性训练连续体 抑制-拉伸-激活-整合; 关节逐级方法 Cook/Boyle; 姿势与代偿模式识别; PAR-Q+ 与 ACSM 运动前筛查指南); (c) 教学与指令 (外部 vs 内部注意焦点 Wulf; 差异化学习 Schöllhorn; 约束导向方法 Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE 自动调节 Zourdos/Helms; 动机访谈在健身中的应用 Rollnick/Miller); (d) 营养指导的执业边界 (宏量营养素周期化; Precision Nutrition / ISSN 立场声明的循证建议; 边界: 私教提供一般性指导, 医学营养治疗需 RD/RDN 资质; 能量可用性与 RED-S Mountjoy IOC 共识); (e) 商业与客户管理 (客户留存与方案依从; 咨询与销售伦理; 线上教练平台与规模化 Goodman PTDC; 方案交付工具 TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; 课时定价模型; 独立教练 vs 健身房雇员); (f) 专项方向 (运动表现 CSCS; 纠正性训练 CES; 老年健身 SFN; 产前产后; 青少年 YSCA; 适应性 / 无障碍健身; 健美 / 形体; 力量举; 耐力运动 S&C)。诚实处理: 兄弟科学 vs 循证之争, 补剂行业利益冲突, 合成代谢激素使用现状 (诚实但不推广: 匿名调查约 30% 有经验男性健身者使用过 — 业内估, Kanayama/Pope/Hudson 记录健康风险, WADA 禁用清单用于竞技语境), 体型焦虑与进食障碍风险 (男性私教肌肉变形症, 正食症倾向, NEDA 负责任语言指南), 健身房掠夺性销售 (高压推销、误导性对比照、长约锁定), 执业边界违规 (私教诊断伤病或超范围开饮食处方), 线上教练认证造假 (周末速成、未经认可的认证)。不含: 物理治疗 / 康复治疗 (持照医疗职业), 不含: 团课教练 (Les Mills/Zumba/CrossFit 分馆教练 — 相邻但不同), 不含: 精英竞技运动教练 (团队项目周期化, 不同职业路径), 不含: 营养作为主业 (临床营养学需单独资质)。 (Personal Trainer — the craft of designing, coaching, and progressing individualized exercise programs for clients, distinct from group fitness instruction, physiotherapy, or sports coaching: (a) exercise programming and periodization (linear / undulating / block periodization per Bompa & Haff; NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning as industry bible; Schoenfeld on hypertrophy mechanisms; Helms/Valdez/Morgan Muscle & Strength Pyramids; conjugate method Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength linear progression Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization volume landmarks Israetel); (b) movement assessment and screening (FMS Gray Cook; NASM CEx corrective exercise continuum inhibit-lengthen-activate-integrate; joint-by-joint approach Cook/Boyle; posture and compensation pattern identification; PAR-Q+ and pre-exercise screening ACSM guidelines); (c) coaching and cueing (external vs internal cueing Wulf attentional focus research; differential learning Schöllhorn; constraints-led approach Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE autoregulation Zourdos/Helms; motivational interviewing for adherence Rollnick/Miller adapted to fitness); (d) nutrition guidance within scope of practice (macronutrient periodization; evidence-based recommendations per Precision Nutrition / ISSN position stands; scope boundary: PT gives general guidance NOT medical nutrition therapy which requires RD/RDN credential; energy availability and RED-S awareness Mountjoy IOC consensus); (e) business and client management (client retention and programming adherence; consultation and sales ethics; online coaching platforms and scaling Goodman PTDC; programming delivery tools like TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; session pricing models; independent contractor vs gym employee dynamics); (f) specialization tracks (sports performance CSCS; corrective exercise CES; senior fitness SFN; pre/postnatal; youth YSCA; adaptive/inclusive fitness; bodybuilding/physique coaching; powerlifting/strength sports; endurance athlete S&C). Evidence-based practice as the core ethos: Schoenfeld/Krieger meta-analyses on volume-response, Helms systematic reviews on protein/resistance training, Brad Schoenfeld's MASS journal bridging research to practice, Menno Henselmans and Eric Helms as practitioner-researchers, Greg Nuckols Stronger By Science as translation layer. Chinese fitness industry context: rapid growth of personal training in commercial gyms (Keep/Lefit/Megafit chains), NSCA-CPT and ACE-CPT as dominant certifications alongside local CSFA (China Sport and Fitness Association) credential, '体适能' (physical fitness) as formal term, online coaching boom post-COVID, PT business models in tier 1-3 cities diverge sharply. Honest treatment of: bro science vs evidence-based d

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Get a quick structural overview of a codebase with Trailmark. The skill identifies programming languages, counts entry points where execution begins, and returns dependency information to support orientation before deeper analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Getting oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
• Checking languages and entry point counts before analysis
• Preparing a structural overview for Vivisect or Galvanize

Expert-level optimization knowledge. Use when working with linear programming, convex optimization, nonlinear programming, integer programming, dynamic programming, gradient methods, duality theory, or optimization algorithms. Also use when the user mentions 'linear programming', 'simplex method', 'convex optimization', 'Lagrangian', 'KKT conditions', 'gradient descent', 'Newton method', 'integer programming', 'dynamic programming', 'duality', 'Bellman equation', or 'branch and bound'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build AI workflows with DSPy by defining inputs and outputs and combining reusable components. Create question answering systems that use retrieved documents, tool-using agents, and automatically optimized prompts, then compare results with evaluation data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build question answering systems that use retrieved documents
• Optimize prompts using examples and evaluation metrics
• Combine AI tasks into reusable processing stages

Build AI workflows with DSPy by defining inputs and outputs and combining reusable components. Create question answering systems that use retrieved documents, tool-using agents, and automatically optimized prompts, then compare results with evaluation data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build question answering systems that use retrieved documents
• Optimize prompts using examples and evaluation metrics
• Combine AI tasks into reusable processing stages

Build a graph of functions and calls across multiple programming languages to investigate entry points, paths to sensitive operations, and potential impact. Use the results to prioritize security reviews and connect external findings with source code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Tracing call paths from entry points to sensitive functions
• Prioritizing code for a security audit
• Connecting calls across language and RPC boundaries

Build complex AI systems with declarative programming, optimize prompts automatically, create modular RAG systems and agents with DSPy - Stanford NLP's framework for systematic LM programming

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Aider is an open-source AI pair programming tool that runs in your terminal, letting you collaborate with LLMs to edit code across your entire codebase. With 42k+ GitHub stars and 15 billion tokens processed weekly, it features deep git integration, repo-wide code mapping, and support for 100+ programming languages.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Declarative programming framework for optimizing LLM prompts through compilation and automatic tuning

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate code generation models with HumanEval, MBPP, and other benchmarks. Test generated programs, compare models across programming languages, and record pass@k scores, which estimate the chance that at least one of k solutions passes the tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing code generation models on shared benchmarks
• Measuring correctness across programming languages
• Evaluating models trained to follow instructions

Answer Python questions and write code using examples fetched from pythonsheets.com. Find patterns for syntax, asynchronous tasks, networking, databases, machine learning, and distributed computing, or use topic-based questions to prepare for Python interviews.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing for Python interviews
• Learning asyncio through examples
• Writing a socket server

Automate construction data processing using LLM (ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA). Generate Python/Pandas scripts, extract data from documents, and create automated pipelines without deep programming knowledge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build complex AI systems with declarative programming, optimize prompts automatically, create modular RAG systems and agents with DSPy - Stanford NLP's framework for systematic LM programming

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Delegate code exploration, feature development, bug fixes, and reviews to Qwen Code through acpx, a command-line client for communicating with agents. Use ongoing sessions, separate task sessions, and structured output to coordinate development work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Asking questions about an unfamiliar codebase
• Creating projects and adding features
• Investigating bugs and failing tests

Audit existing SKILL.md files for clear activation conditions, usable instructions, and defined outputs. Get prioritized findings and specific improvements, with changes applied only when requested and the author's intent preserved.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Audit existing skills for quality issues
• Clarify when a skill should activate
• Move lengthy examples into supporting files

Turn reusable workflows and project conventions into concise instructions for AI agents. Structure SKILL.md with required metadata, move supporting material into local files, and register project skills in AGENTS.md when applicable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning a recurring workflow into an agent skill
• Documenting project conventions for AI agents
• Moving lengthy explanations into supporting files

Expert Java developer skill for AgentScope Java framework - a reactive, message-driven multi-agent system built on Project Reactor. Use when working with reactive programming, LLM integration, agent orchestration, multi-agent systems, or when the user mentions AgentScope, ReActAgent, Mono/Flux, Project Reactor, or Java agent development. Specializes in non-blocking code, tool integration, hooks, pipelines, and production-ready agent applications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build AI-powered software with TypeSafe: small units of AI intelligence you can use like programming primitives. Its System One models, including Jev, turn natural language and application state into typed judgments and probabilities that code can combine. Use when a feature needs programmable common sense, when brainstorming what AI could make possible in an app, or when an LLM prompt-and-parse step could become a structured decision. Applications include routing, ranking, extraction, verification, and interactive experiences; these are starting points, not the limits. Read live docs and cookbooks to find useful patterns and discover new combinations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trigger: improve skills, audit skills, refactor skills, skill quality. Audit and upgrade existing LLM-first skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trigger: /skill-creation, skill creation, skill creator, create skill, new skill. Create LLM-first skills with valid frontmatter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Operating SOP for DSPy (Stanford NLP) — the declarative framework for "programming, not prompting" language models. Activate when the user says any of: "use DSPy", "compile a prompt", "optimize prompts/programs", "MIPRO/MIPROv2", "BootstrapFewShot", "GEPA", "Signatures + Modules", "teleprompter", "auto-tune prompts for a different LM", or whenever a brittle hand-crafted prompt pipeline needs to be turned into a *compiled*, measurable, swappable program. Do NOT activate for one-shot prompt tweaks, no-metric exploratory work, or pipelines where prompts must remain human-authored verbatim — use raw prompting or LangChain templates instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

SOP for terminal-based, git-native AI pair programming with Aider (git work-tree + tree-sitter repo-map + edit-format + human-in-loop REPL). Use when editing code in an existing git repo via an LLM, when you need to converge a change to 2-5 files, pick an edit format that fits the model, run architect+editor mode, or wire an auto-test loop.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Aider is an open-source terminal AI pair programmer that edits files in your git repository with an LLM and commits each change. Use when a user asks to run Aider, let an AI refactor or fix code from the command line, script Aider with --message, auto-run lint and tests after edits, or point Aider at Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek or a local model.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.