'modularity' 검색 결과

Produces modularity review documents in both Markdown and HTML formats. Use when writing the final review output from a modularity analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes a codebase's modularity imbalances using the Balanced Coupling model and produces a review of design issues. Use when reviewing existing code for coupling problems, assessing architecture quality, identifying distributed monolith risks, or finding areas where changes are unexpectedly expensive.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The Balanced Coupling model for software design. Use when: designing modular architectures, evaluating coupling between components, reviewing code modularity, deciding whether to split or merge modules/services, assessing integration patterns, classifying coupling as balanced or unbalanced, applying DDD strategic and tactical patterns, reasoning about cohesion vs coupling trade-offs, identifying distributed monolith risks, or explaining why a system is hard to change. Provides the three-dimensional framework (integration strength, distance, volatility) and the balance rule for making coupling decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

MMI評価エージェント - Modularity Maturity Indexによるモジュール成熟度評価（Cohesion/Coupling/Independence/Reusability）。/evaluate-mmi [対象パス] で呼び出し。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

MMI評価エージェント - Modularity Maturity Indexによるモジュール成熟度評価（Cohesion/Coupling/Independence/Reusability）。/evaluate-mmi [対象パス] で呼び出し。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design and review how a system is divided into modules, cohesive parts with clear responsibilities. Evaluate data ownership, communication rules, dependencies, and failure handling, and decide when to split or merge parts without assuming a particular technology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Define responsibilities and boundaries for a new module
• Review dependencies between system modules
• Clarify data ownership and communication rules

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This package is a implementation of biclustering ensemble method MoSBi (Molecular signature Identification from Biclustering). MoSBi provides standardized interfaces for biclustering results and can combine their results with a multi-algorithm ensemble approach to compute robust ensemble biclusters on molecular omics data. This is done by computing similarity networks of biclusters and filtering for overlaps using a custom error model. After that, the louvain modularity it used to extract biclus

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs modular high-level architectures from functional requirements and produces design documents for each module. Use when designing a new system, creating architecture documentation, or producing module-level design specs with integration contracts and test specifications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implements hub-and-spoke lazy loading to minimize token usage in large skills. Use when building multi-module skills that need conditional on-demand loading.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build composable skill modules with hub-and-spoke loading. Use when token budget is tight.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Applies the reasoning, architectural principles, and AI philosophy of Christopher Manning (natural language processing expert, Stanford University, director of Stanford AI Lab). Use this skill whenever you are discussing natural language processing, LLM architecture, AI research strategy, cognitive science, or the evolution of machine learning. Trigger this skill for questions about AGI timelines, academic vs. industry research trade-offs, linguistic structure in neural networks, modularity in AI design, or evaluating true intelligence versus mere memorization. Channel his pragmatic focus on domain science, adaptability, and competing on ideas rather than raw compute.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure and improve Isabelle or Coq proofs to enhance readability, modularity, and maintainability without changing semantics. Use when proofs are long and monolithic, have repeated patterns, use unclear naming, lack documentation, or when the user asks to refactor, clean up, improve, or reorganize their formal proofs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Applies the reasoning, architectural principles, and AI philosophy of Christopher Manning (natural language processing expert, Stanford University, director of Stanford AI Lab). Use this skill whenever you are discussing natural language processing, LLM architecture, AI research strategy, cognitive science, or the evolution of machine learning. Trigger this skill for questions about AGI timelines, academic vs. industry research trade-offs, linguistic structure in neural networks, modularity in AI design, or evaluating true intelligence versus mere memorization. Channel his pragmatic focus on domain science, adaptability, and competing on ideas rather than raw compute.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when designing, evaluating, documenting, modernizing, reviewing, refactoring, or implementing software architecture and code-level structure, including requirements, context, architecture style selection, microservices patterns, WebAssembly/WASI/Component Model, UMA portable capabilities, runtime contracts, capability graphs, governed MCP/agent orchestration, clean code, code smells, Rust crate/library API architecture, Cargo feature/MSRV/SemVer policy, unsafe/FFI/no_std/library testing, modularity, views, NFR tactics, IAM/auth, security patterns, cost estimation, architecture-as-code fitness functions, ADR/RFC work, and engineering execution plans.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.