'moscow' 검색 결과

Use this skill when prioritizing a Salesforce backlog with the MoSCoW method (Must / Should / Could / Won't) plus an effort + value lens, deciding what fits in the next sprint or release, and using WSJF as a tie-break when MoSCoW alone produces ties. Trigger keywords: MoSCoW prioritization, must should could won't, WSJF salesforce, prioritize salesforce stories, sprint commit, backlog grooming. NOT for story writing or splitting (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for release train planning (use agents/release-train-planner). NOT for sizing/estimation method debates — this skill assumes a sizing convention is already in place.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compare nine methods for setting priorities, including RICE and ICE, which score ideas using factors such as impact and confidence. Use formulas, selection guidance, and linked templates to choose an approach for customer problems, initiatives, or requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choosing a method for setting priorities
• Comparing RICE and ICE
• Ranking customer problems by importance and satisfaction

Create and maintain a product or project backlog with prioritized items, acceptance criteria, and estimates. Covers user story writing, MoSCoW prioritization, backlog grooming, item splitting, and status tracking. Use when starting a new project and converting scope into actionable items, during ongoing grooming before sprint planning, re-prioritizing after stakeholder feedback or scope changes, or splitting oversized items into implementable pieces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnostic-only test suite auditor. Classifies repo type, maps against 7-layer testing taxonomy (git hooks → static → unit → integration → system → E2E → acceptance), runs deterministic quality gates (coverage, mutation, CRAP, architecture, escape-scan), builds RTM / personas / journeys traceability, produces TEST_AUDIT.md, updates tests/TESTING.md, and mandatorily hands off to implement-tests when gaps are found. Use when auditing test quality, finding test gaps, or running the full 7-layer sweep. Trigger with "audit tests", "find gaps", "test audit", "check test quality", "full sweep", "7-layer audit", "rtm check".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Product Requirements Document writing - PRD templates, MoSCoW prioritization, user personas, competitive analysis, feature specs, acceptance criteria, risk assessment

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Complete Product Owner / Product Manager capability — a wiki-style knowledge map of product practice in active software development: the role and its boundaries, strategy cascade (vision → OKRs → roadmap → backlog), continuous discovery, backlog craft (epics, INVEST stories, acceptance criteria), prioritization frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, WSJF), sprint delivery, metrics (North Star, AARRR), stakeholder management, and anti-patterns. The PO/PM owns what gets built, in what order, and why — including the end-to-end user flows and user journeys. Use when scoping a product or feature, decomposing an idea into outcomes/epics/stories, prioritizing a backlog, defining an MVP, mapping user journeys, measuring success, or saying no to a stakeholder. Pairs with super-ui-ux-design, which owns how each screen looks and behaves.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn PRD.md into FEATURES.md: permanent feature IDs, MoSCoW priorities, acceptance criteria and the PRD requirement each feature comes from.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

PRD writing and product definition expert. Use when writing PRDs, user stories, acceptance criteria, or prioritizing features. Covers RICE/MoSCoW frameworks, agile requirements, and specification best practices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write comprehensive Product Requirements Documents with user stories, acceptance criteria, technical specifications, wireframe descriptions, and prioritization frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW). Create clear specifications for product teams.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract and summarize core features, constraints, and priorities from requirement documents. Use when analyzing PRDs, RFCs, business requirements, user stories, epics, or any requirement documentation to identify must-have features, technical constraints, priority levels (P0/P1/P2/MoSCoW), and key decision points. Triggers when users ask to summarize, analyze, extract, or understand requirements from documents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

專案管理工作流：Sprint 規劃、Issue 優先排序（MoSCoW/RICE）、狀態報告、風險評估、Sprint 回顧。適合在啟動新專案、Sprint 規劃會議、撰寫進度報告、或做任務優先排序時使用。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when ordering board tasks - set priority/blocked_by/deploy_depends_on by severity and dependency, split MoSCoW within a feature, and use RICE/ICE only for a genuine "what next" call across several features

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantifying priority by scoring competing items with ICE/RICE/WSJF/MoSCoW/Cost of Delay/Kano. No code. Use to prioritize features/bugs/initiatives or arbitrate Must vs Should at MVP scoping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Executes a four-phase feature addition workflow (Discovery, Planning, TDD Implementation, Verification) for Python projects. Use when adding a new feature end-to-end — discovering project structure and integration points, drafting a feature spec with MoSCoW-prioritized requirements and BDD acceptance criteria, implementing via test-first TDD cycles, then verifying with ruff lint, ty type checks, and behavior-focused regression and contract coverage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

划分 MVP 范围、明确非目标范围时使用。适用于第一版功能定义、范围控制、需求收敛。优先使用 MoSCoW 四级分类 + 非目标范围明示。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert product management guidance for day-to-day PM work. Use when creating roadmaps, prioritizing features, managing stakeholders, planning sprints, grooming backlogs, scoping features, planning releases, defining OKRs, managing technical debt, or coordinating go-to-market. Covers RICE, ICE, MoSCoW frameworks, cross-functional collaboration, and product metrics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prioritize a feature backlog or list of ideas. Use when the user says "help me prioritize", "prioritize this backlog", "RICE score these", "MoSCoW", "opportunity solution tree", "what should we build first", "rank these features", or has a list of items and needs to decide order - even if they don't explicitly say "prioritization".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when authoring INVEST-compliant Salesforce user stories from gathered requirements: shaping the As-A/I-Want/So-That stem, writing Given-When-Then acceptance criteria, sizing complexity (S/M/L/XL), splitting stories that are too large for a sprint, and emitting handoff metadata that names the next downstream agent. Trigger keywords: user story, INVEST, story splitting, story sizing, As-A I-Want So-That, story handoff, recommended_agents, backlog item shape. NOT for requirements elicitation or stakeholder interviews (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for the Given-When-Then technique itself in depth (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for UAT test case design (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for backlog prioritization (use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when building or maintaining a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) on a Salesforce project: one row per requirement, columns for source, user-story id(s), test-case id(s), defect id(s), sprint, release, and status. Covers forward traceability (req → story → code → test) and backward traceability (test → req). Trigger keywords: RTM, requirements traceability matrix, audit trail for salesforce delivery, traceability for steerco, deferred requirement tracking, regulatory traceability. NOT for eliciting the requirements in the first place — use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf. NOT for user-story authoring — use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for UAT test design — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for Apex test design — use apex/test-class-standards. NOT for backlog prioritization — use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog. More triggers: traceability.md, build-layer traceability, REQ-XXX and FG-XXX id mapping, artefact-to-requirement orphan report, coverage-gap report, check_rtm.py --manifest-dir, owning run-time agent column, design decision ref column, metadata API name in a traceability row.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for prioritization, or when there are more tasks than capacity: "what should we do first?", "rank this backlog", "cut scope for the MVP", "RICE score these". Picks a method (RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, impact-effort), scores items and sets a cut line. Skip for choosing between two designs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[Project Management] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for planned-work prioritization using RICE, MoSCoW or Value-Effort ranking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide the user through starting a new web application project — elicit requirements (MoSCoW scoping), create architecture and requirements documents, break work into tasks, and register them as a GitHub Project kanban board. Use when the user says "新しいWebアプリを作りたい", "Webアプリの立ち上げを手伝って", "start a new web app project", "プロジェクトの要件を整理したい", or "GitHub Projectにタスクを登録したい".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.