'obligations' 검색 결과

Organize EU AI Act compliance work with references to Articles and Annexes. Classify AI systems by risk, plan conformity assessments that check regulatory requirements, prepare technical documentation checklists, and map obligations and deadlines to organizational roles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing risk classification for a new AI system
• Planning conformity assessments for high-risk AI
• Preparing technical documentation checklists

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Maps the full set of legal obligations for the EU AI Act based on role + risk tier, producing an actionable compliance matrix with RACI assignments and implementation priorities. This skill should be used when the user asks to "map AI Act obligations", "check what we need to do under the AI Act", "create a compliance checklist", "check deployer obligations", "assess provider duties", or mentions Art. 26, Art. 16-17, AI literacy Art. 4, DPIA, fundamental rights assessment, or "Pflichtenkatalog" under the AI Act.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and determine compliance obligations. Use when asked to assess AI risk level, check if an AI system is prohibited, determine high-risk status, identify GPAI model obligations, map provider/deployer responsibilities, or build an AI Act compliance roadmap. Covers the full classification decision tree (Prohibited → High-Risk → Limited → Minimal → GPAI), obligations by role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor), compliance timelines, and DACH-specific considerations (German works council, BaFin, BSI, BNetzA). Triggers on phrases like "classify this AI system", "is this high-risk under the AI Act", "AI Act risk assessment", "EU AI Act compliance", "prohibited AI practice", "GPAI obligations", "AI Act timeline".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review a vendor’s agreements across connected contract systems, customer records, email, document storage, and chat. Consolidate signing status, key terms, missing agreements, renewal deadlines, and obligations that may continue after expiration into one report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check agreement coverage before onboarding a vendor
• Review contracts before a vendor renewal
• Identify missing master, data processing, or work agreements

Review an AI system's EU AI Act readiness through six structured questions. Produce an article-cited assessment covering risk classification, conformity checks, organizational obligations, transparency, and general-purpose models, with gaps and three prioritized actions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing a new or materially changed AI system
• Checking readiness before an EU launch
• Refreshing an annual compliance assessment

Review licenses in dependency lists, individual libraries, or code planned for public release. Get a memo covering obligations for the deployment model, license conflicts, unresolved questions, and recommended actions for legal review before shipping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review dependency licenses before shipping
• Assess a library before adding it
• Check license compatibility before releasing code

Turn contracts, reports, and scanned forms into cited facts and proposed tasks. Preserve deadlines, explicit owners, source locations, and uncertainty, then create and verify records in an external tracker only within the user's approved scope.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Extract obligations and deadlines from contracts
• Turn reports into proposed follow-up tasks
• Structure scanned forms while flagging uncertain text

Calculate financial ratios from company statements to assess profitability, ability to cover obligations, efficiency, and valuation. Results include explanations, comparisons across periods, available industry benchmarks, and a formatted Excel report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing profitability across reporting periods
• Assessing ability to cover short-term obligations
• Calculating valuation ratios for investment analysis

Turn a product retirement decision into a practical checklist matched to its scale. Organize work by lifecycle phase, assign responsible teams, and define approval conditions while covering data, contracts, access, and financial obligations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning the shutdown of a legacy feature
• Coordinating a product retirement across teams
• Checking data and contract obligations before closure

Reconcile controlled-substance records and prepare for an inspection — the count against the register, the discrepancy investigation, the documentation an inspector asks for, and the reporting obligations a shortfall triggers. Use when asked to reconcile controlled drugs, prepare for a DEA or controlled-drug inspection, investigate a discrepancy or suspected diversion, or audit the CD register. Produces the reconciliation, the discrepancy investigation record, the inspection-readiness checklist, and the escalation and reporting decision tree. A process framework only; reporting thresholds, timelines and obligations are set by law in your jurisdiction and must be verified there.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations, Data Principal rights, Significant Data Fiduciary, Data Protection Board of India, consent under DPDPA, notice requirements, breach notification India, children's data India, cross-border data transfer India, India privacy compliance, DPDPA gap analysis, DPDPA vs GDPR, or any obligation under India's personal data protection framework. Also trigger for: "Section 6 consent", "Section 7 legitimate uses", "Section 9 children's data", "Section 10 SDF", "Section 16 cross-border", "Rule 6 breach notification", "Rule 13 SDF obligations", "Data Protection Board complaint", "verifiable parental consent India", "DPDPA compliance roadmap", or "India privacy law global company".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus, Reg. (EU) 2026/1744, in force July 27, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of August 2026. GPAI enforcement powers active since August 2, 2026.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Elite incident response and legal compliance guidance for data breaches under GDPR Articles 33 & 34. Use when: (1) User reports a data breach or security incident — including "is this even a personal data breach?" triage, (2) User asks about breach notification obligations or deadlines, (3) User mentions "72 hours", Art. 33, Art. 34, or notification requirements, (4) Discussion involves security incidents affecting personal data, (5) User needs breach risk assessment using ENISA methodology, (6) User mentions "Data Breach" or "Incident" or "Data Leakage" or "Ransomware" or "Exfiltration", (7) User needs to determine Controller vs Processor obligations, (8) Cross-border breach scenarios requiring Lead SA determination, (9) User needs a mitigation playbook or immediate response recommendations, (10) User needs audit-ready breach documentation (.docx) or an EDPB-template-aligned breach notification / evidence file — including follow-up and withdrawal notifications, (11) Breach involves an AI system requiring AI Act Art. 73 serious incident screening.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assesses which of the Art. 50(1)-(5) transparency obligations of the EU AI Act apply to a given AI system's provider or deployer, grounded in the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (June 2026) and the Commission's draft Art. 50 Guidelines. Covers AI-chatbot disclosure, deepfake and synthetic-content marking/watermarking, emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation notices, the machine-readable marking duty, the obviousness exceptions, and the implementation timeline. Outputs a formal mini-report plus a per-obligation compliance checklist with gap flags. For breadth-first tier triage use the EU AI Act System Classifier; for raw Art. 50 text and Q&A use the EU AI Act Knowledge Base; for the full role x tier matrix use the EU AI Act Obligations Mapper.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Practitioner skill for advising on EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Chapter VIII (interoperability and smart contracts, gate-only). Use when the user asks about Data Act rights or obligations, drafts a Data Act notice or letter, reviews a data-sharing or cloud-switching contract under the Data Act, runs a Data Act gap analysis, or asks how the Data Act interacts with GDPR, the DMA, the Trade Secrets Directive, or sectoral law. Triggers include "Data Act", "Datengesetz", "Regulation (EU) 2023/2854", "Art. 4(1) request", "Art. 5(1) third-party request", "trade-secret handbrake", "cloud switching obligations", "Chapter VI", "Ch V exceptional need", and references to specific Data Act articles or recitals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations, Data Principal rights, Significant Data Fiduciary, Data Protection Board of India, consent under DPDPA, notice requirements, breach notification India, children's data India, cross-border data transfer India, India privacy compliance, DPDPA gap analysis, DPDPA vs GDPR, or any obligation under India's personal data protection framework. Also trigger for: "Section 6 consent", "Section 7 legitimate uses", "Section 9 children's data", "Section 10 SDF", "Section 16 cross-border", "Rule 6 breach notification", "Rule 13 SDF obligations", "Data Protection Board complaint", "verifiable parental consent India", "DPDPA compliance roadmap", or "India privacy law global company".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a user asks what the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) means for their product, whether and when they must report a vulnerability or incident, or what a specific CVE triggers legally. Maps a product with digital elements to CRA scope, product classification, Annex I vulnerability-handling duties, and Article 14 reporting obligations — every legal claim cited from official regulation text fetched live through the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector, joined with live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS vulnerability intelligence from the same connector.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when the user asks to determine what tax filings they need, wants to know if they must file a tax return (確定申告), asks about consumption tax obligations (消費税), or needs help understanding their filing requirements. Trigger phrases include: "確定申告が必要か", "申告の種類", "消費税の届出", "課税事業者かどうか", "何を申告すればいい", "申告要否", "税金の申告", "住民税の申告".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implements CCPA Section 1798.105 right to delete and CPRA amendments including service provider obligations, statutory exceptions for legal, security, and internal uses, consumer identity verification procedures, and 45-day response timeline management. Activate for CCPA deletion, CPRA right to delete, California privacy, consumer deletion queries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.