'owasp' 검색 결과

Assess an application against OWASP Top 10:2025 risk categories using Strix. Get findings backed by working exploit examples, organized by category, with clear explanations of what was tested and what remains unassessed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing an app against OWASP Top 10:2025
• Testing access controls across users and tenants
• Organizing proven vulnerabilities by risk category

Review an AI agent codebase against ten OWASP ASI security risk areas. Examine tool permissions, input validation, identity checks, audit logs, and other controls, then summarize coverage, gaps, and recommended improvements in a report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing agent security before production deployment
• Mapping existing controls to ten security risk areas
• Preparing findings for a security review or audit

Set up repeatable security tests for LLM apps with Promptfoo and DeepTeam. Connect them to automated build pipelines, detect renewed vulnerabilities to malicious instructions or data leakage, and compare results across model or prompt changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Running automated attack tests on every code change
• Blocking merges when security tests fail
• Comparing security across model or prompt versions

Assess iOS and Android app security using OWASP MASTG, a mobile security testing guide. Examine app files, runtime behavior, stored data, authentication, and API traffic, then document vulnerabilities, their impact, and suggested fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assess mobile app security before release
• Check sensitive data storage and network traffic
• Test authentication and resistance to runtime manipulation

红队渗透 / 攻防 — 受授权的红队作业者 + 渗透测试工程师 + 攻击型安全顾问的认知操作系统 (侦察 OSINT / 外网渗透 / 内网 AD 渗透 BloodHound + Kerberoasting + ADCS 利用 + 横向移动 / Web 应用渗透 OWASP WSTG / 移动 OWASP MASTG / 云渗透 AWS Azure GCP IAM 路径 + 容器逃逸 + K8s / C2 操作 Cobalt Strike Sliver Mythic Havoc + OPSEC / 初始访问 + AV EDR 绕过 (仅授权场景) / 无线 RF / 物理社工 / 报告与整改 / 框架 MITRE ATT&CK + D3FEND + PTES + OSSTMM + NIST 800-115 + Kill Chain / 法律伦理 CFAA + 网络安全法 + 刑法 285 286 + 数据安全法 + GDPR + 授权书 + 范围 + 交战规则 — 不含 黑产 / 未授权攻击 / 大规模 exploitation / 供应链投毒 / 未授权 DoS — 这是 重罪 + 行业封杀 + 律师吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界 — 也不含 蓝队 SOC + 恶意软件 即服务 / 僵尸网络 / 勒索软件作者 — 这是 cybercrime 不是 红队) (Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasion (phishing infrastructure, payload development, AV / EDR evasion, BYOVD, AMSI / ETW bypass — strictly for authorized engagements), (i) wireless / RF (WPA2/3, evil twin, Wi-Fi pivots), (j) physical / social engineering (badge cloning, pretexting, vishing — under engagement letter), (k) reporting & remediation (executive summary, technical findings, CVSS, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, retest), (l) frameworks & methodology (MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE D3FEND, PTES, OSSTMM, NIST SP 800-115, OWASP WSTG / MASTG, Cyber Kill Chain, Unified Kill Chain, Diamond Model), (m) law & ethics (CFAA US, Computer Misuse Act UK, 中国 刑法 285/286 + 网络安全法 + 数据安全法, GDPR for tested EU systems, engagement letter, scope, rules of engagement, safe harbor for bug bounty); NOT criminal hacking / 黑产 / unauthorized targeting / mass exploitation / supply-chain compromise / DoS against unconsented systems (这是 重罪 + 业内开除 + 律师执照吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界), NOT pure defensive blue team / SOC analyst tradecraft (是 平行学科, 仅做 边界标注 + ATT&CK 反推方向), NOT malware-as-a-service development / botnet ops / ransomware authoring (是 cybercrime 不是 红队), NOT 'ethical hacking' 在 'just curious 看看' 自我合理化的灰色操作 (违反 authorization 原则即不是 红队).) Master OS — automated mastery of Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasi

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review code and infrastructure for security risks, map potential threats, and plan stronger defenses. The skill covers OWASP checks, attack and defense exercises, and incident response, with validation required for each environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing code and infrastructure security
• Mapping threats with STRIDE or PASTA
• Planning stronger security settings

Review security across web apps, APIs, mobile apps, Kubernetes, and AI agents using six OWASP references. Identify risky authentication, access controls, configurations, and prompt handling, then use examples and checklists to plan fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review login flows and access controls
• Check API authorization and data exposure
• Review mobile app storage and communications

Assess web applications, APIs, and infrastructure for security weaknesses through authorized testing. The skill guides code review, dependency and secret scanning, targeted vulnerability checks, and report creation with evidence, severity ratings, and remediation priorities.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check a web application against the OWASP Top 10
• Test API authentication and access controls
• Scan dependencies and Git history for security risks

Helps review application code, authentication, access controls, and dependencies for security flaws. Uses OWASP guidance and CVE reports, records of known vulnerabilities, to assess impact and recommend practical fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing application code for security flaws
• Assessing known vulnerabilities in dependencies
• Checking authentication and data access controls

Organize AI agent security findings using the ten OWASP ASI risk categories. Map issues such as leaked credentials or unauthorized tool calls to category IDs, and assign severity levels with suggested remediation timeframes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Classify AI agent security findings
• Assign categories to leaks and unauthorized tool calls
• Organize findings from multiple detection skills

Assess REST, GraphQL, and gRPC APIs for authentication, access control, input validation, and business logic weaknesses. Use OWASP API Security Top 10, a framework of common API risks, to organize testing and document findings with reproduction steps and remediation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing API access across user roles
• Checking token handling and request rate limits
• Assessing GraphQL access control and data exposure

Reviews code for security vulnerabilities and guides secure implementation using OWASP Top 10:2025, ASVS 5.0, the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2026), and the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications (2026). Use when reviewing code or a diff for security issues, implementing authentication, authorization, sessions, or cryptography, handling untrusted input, files, or URLs, hardening config, dependencies, or CI, or building LLM and AI agent features.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review source code for MCP, a protocol connecting AI applications to tools. Check authentication, input validation, unsafe execution, and other security risks, then report findings with file and line references and separate manual follow-ups.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing an MCP server before release
• Checking authentication and validation on a network-exposed server
• Auditing tool code for unsafe execution paths

Run a quick code security review for exposed credentials, injection risks, unsafe page content, vulnerable dependencies, and authentication issues. Receive findings grouped by severity, with file locations and suggested fixes to prioritize remediation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing sensitive code changes before merging
• Checking for exposed credentials
• Reviewing authentication and injection risks

Audit application source code against the OWASP Top 10 (2021) vulnerability categories — broken access control, cryptographic failures, injection, insecure design, security misconfiguration, vulnerable components, authentication failures, data integrity, logging failures, SSRF. Use when the user mentions 'OWASP,' 'OWASP Top 10,' 'security audit,' 'security review,' 'secure code review,' 'code security review,' 'vulnerability audit,' 'find vulnerabilities,' 'appsec review,' 'application security audit,' 'check for security issues,' 'broken access control,' 'IDOR,' 'SQL injection,' 'XSS,' 'SSRF,' or wants to check their codebase for common security weaknesses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Find dependency confusion risks, where a public package can replace an internal package with the same name. Review dependency files, identify exposed names, and guide registry restrictions and recurring CI checks to prevent substitution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Auditing projects that mix private and public package registries
• Checking exposure after internal package names have leaked
• Restricting package sources to approved private registries

Test whether API users can read or change fields beyond their permissions. Examine responses for sensitive data, inject extra request fields to check unauthorized updates, and use explicit lists of allowed fields to guide fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check API responses for excessive sensitive data
• Test whether added request fields allow unauthorized updates
• Compare field access across user privilege levels

Implement application security controls, including login, access permissions, password hashing, and input validation. The skill provides code, configuration requirements, and testing guidance for checking protections against unauthorized access, malicious input, and sensitive data exposure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Implementing login with password hashing and rate limits
• Adding JWT validation and session protection
• Preventing SQL injection and malicious script execution

Test REST, gRPC, and WebSocket APIs for weaknesses in authentication, access controls, input handling, and configuration. Provides protocol-specific checks, tool guidance, and detection indicators to help document reproducible findings and severity during authorized assessments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check access controls across users and roles
• Review token lifecycles and request limits
• Assess gRPC and WebSocket security