10건 · 관련도순
Guides conversion of gap analysis findings into phased implementation plans with milestones and risk-based prioritisation. Activate when building compliance programmes or allocating privacy budgets. Keywords: remediation roadmap, implementation plan, phased approach, prioritisation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Critique a rendered screen's density — cognitive load, content prioritisation, scanning patterns, and progressive disclosure. Use when a screen feels overwhelming. For the underlying choice-count principle, use `hicks-law` (interaction-design).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research budgeting and funding operations — study budget construction, cost per participant and per insight, burn against milestones, and portfolio prioritisation by decision value. Use when costing, tracking, or ranking research.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides privacy law change monitoring and impact assessment for multi-jurisdiction organisations. Covers regulatory tracking sources, change classification, impact scoring methodology, and implementation prioritisation. Keywords: law monitoring, regulatory tracking, change management, impact assessment, implementation priority.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Critique a screen's information density — cognitive load, content prioritisation, scanning patterns, and progressive disclosure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Query the Open Targets Platform GraphQL API for target-disease associations, genetic and clinical evidence, tractability and safety liabilities, target prioritisation metrics, known drugs and mechanisms of action, and disease ontology. Use this skill for target identification and validation, target-disease evidence review, druggability assessment, drug repurposing, and resolving gene, disease, and drug names to Ensembl, MONDO, and ChEMBL identifiers. Also trigger when a query mentions Open Targets, platform.opentargets.org, association scores, tractability buckets, or api.platform.opentargets.org.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when surfacing tech debt as trackable items — interest-vs-principal framing, prioritisation by carrying cost, repayment plan — even if the user just says 'this codebase is a mess'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when someone wants to know where to start with the grcskills library, or asks "review my GRC setup", "what should I fix before the audit", "which compliance skills do I need", "audit my ISMS folder", "give me a 30-day compliance plan" or "rank the skills for my company". Reads the frontmatter of every skill in the library, inspects the compliance material the agent can reach (repo, policy folder, registers, platform exports), ranks the 10 skills that would help most with impact, effort and evidence for each, audits what is broken, duplicated or missing, and writes a 30-day plan to files in a grc-setup-review folder. Read-only on everything else.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a company starts a compliance programme and needs to know how far it is from a framework, and asks "run a gap analysis", "how ready are we for the audit", "baseline us against the framework", "what do we have and what is missing", "readiness assessment before we hire an auditor" or "how long until we can certify". Baselines what exists against the chosen framework from documents and records, rates each item by evidence rather than opinion, sizes every gap by effort and audit risk, and writes a gap register plus a prioritised summary with the long-lead items first.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.