28건 · 관련도순
Generate or update docs/project-context.md — the single source of truth for project conventions, tech stack, and anti-patterns. Loaded by all agents as a "constitution" to ensure consistent behavior.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create optimized project-context.md for AI agent consistency. Use when the user says "project context" or "generate context"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Routing skill of last resort. Takes a plain-language QA situation and names the right 1-2 skills to use and in what order. Use ONLY when the request does not match any other skill's trigger phrases. Use when: "which skill should I use," "where do I start," "I'm not sure what to test," "/qa-do," or any vague QA situation that doesn't map to one skill. Not for: bootstrapping a brand-new project with no QA — use qa-start. Not for: capturing project setup/context — use qa-project-context. If the request clearly matches another skill, invoke that skill directly instead of routing through here. Related: qa-start, qa-project-context, test-strategy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create and fill .agents/qa-project-context.md with the project's tech stack, test frameworks, CI/CD pipeline, environments, quality goals, risk areas, team structure, and conventions. This is the one file every other QA skill reads first, so they skip redundant discovery and give context-aware advice. Use when: "set up QA context," "configure testing," "initialize project," first use of any QA skill. Not for: bootstrapping a brand-new project's QA end-to-end — use qa-start (which calls this skill as its first step). Related: qa-start, risk-based-testing, test-strategy, qa-metrics, playwright-automation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Sequenced launcher that bootstraps QA on a project with no QA in place. Chains qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning in one guided run, then points you at automation. Use when: "set up QA on a new project," "QA from scratch," "no QA exists yet," "/qa-start." Not for: onboarding a QA engineer to an existing team with existing tests — use qa-project-bootstrap. Not for: "which skill do I use" with no clear match — use qa-do. Related: qa-project-context, test-strategy, test-planning, qa-project-bootstrap, qa-do.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create project-context.md with AI rules. Use when the user says "generate project context" or "create project context"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate or update docs/project-context.md — the source of truth for conventions, tech stack, and anti-patterns, loaded by all agents as a constitution.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create project-context.md with AI rules. Use when the user says "generate project context" or "create project context"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
새 기능이나 제안을 PM, 설계, 개발, QA의 네 관점에서 동시에 검토합니다. 역할별 우려와 첫 행동을 정리하고 공통점과 의견 충돌을 요약합니다.
Create and maintain repository instructions for AI agents in AGENTS.md. Check rules against project evidence, preserve existing requirements during revisions, and record observed mistakes so future agents receive concise, relevant guidance for working in the codebase.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Set up a repo or project so an AI coding agent works well in it — the CLAUDE.md, the context, the guardrails, and the conventions the agent needs to be useful instead of lost. Use when asked how do I set up CLAUDE.md, configure my repo for Claude Code, my AI agent keeps getting my project wrong, or onboard an AI agent to my codebase. Produces a structured CLAUDE.md/project-context file (architecture, conventions, commands, do-nots), the right level of detail (enough to orient, not a novel), the guardrails that keep the agent safe (what not to touch, how to test), and a maintenance habit so it stays current — turning a repo an agent flails in into one it navigates like a teammate.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs. Staged pipeline: requirements extraction → risk analysis → coverage matrix → scenario generation → oracle design → test code → human review, with guardrails against hallucinated APIs and weak assertions. Use when: "generate tests from spec," "tests from PRD," "tests from user story," "auto-generate test cases," "AI write tests for me." Not for: testing AI/LLM features in your product — use ai-system-testing. Not for: auditing a pre-existing test suite you did not just generate — use ai-qa-review (Step 7 here only reviews tests THIS pipeline produced). Related: playwright-automation, unit-testing, api-testing, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Hybrid fingerprint + LLM pipeline for bug classification, deduplication, and ticket generation. Normalizes CI logs, creates stable fingerprints, clusters near-duplicates, then uses LLM for severity classification and ticket writing. Includes bug reporting templates and severity/priority matrix. Use when: "bug triage," "classify bugs," "failure analysis," "auto-classify," "CI failures," "bug report," "defect template." Not for: runtime self-healing of one flaky locator — use test-reliability. Not for: designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, ci-cd-integration, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit," "first 30 days," "QA mentorship," "joining QA team." Not for: setting up QA on a brand-new project from scratch — use `qa-start`. Related: qa-start, qa-project-context, shift-left-testing, ai-qa-review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Test payment and checkout flows end to end against PSP sandboxes — Stripe first, with the general pattern for Adyen/Braintree/PayPal. Covers Stripe test-mode card numbers and their decline codes, the 3DS/SCA challenge flow and its nested-iframe handling in Playwright, test clocks for subscription/billing-cycle simulation, webhook testing (stripe listen/trigger, signature verification, idempotency), failed/retried payments and refunds, and never using real cards. Use when: "test Stripe checkout," "payment test," "3DS test," "test webhook signature," "test subscription renewal," "test clock," "refund test," "decline card test," "checkout E2E." Not for: General API contract testing of non-payment endpoints — api-testing. PCI-DSS/regulatory compliance audit — compliance-testing. Related: api-testing, playwright-automation, compliance-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, regex extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing or Litmus). Related: playwright-automation, api-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validate that analytics and marketing tracking fire CORRECTLY: GA4/GTM dataLayer events, Meta/TikTok/LinkedIn pixels, and ad-tech tags. Covers building a tracking plan as the contract, intercepting collect-endpoint beacons and dataLayer.push in Playwright, asserting event name + params + values + timing + de-duplication, Consent Mode v2 gating, CI regression gating, and news-media events (article-view, scroll-depth, paywall). Use when: "test analytics tracking," "GA4 event test," "verify the pixel fires," "dataLayer test," "tracking plan," "Meta Pixel dedup," "scroll-depth tracking test," "gate tracking in CI." Not for: whether tracking is ALLOWED to fire under consent law (GDPR/CMP) — that is compliance-testing; this skill checks the data is CORRECT. SEO meta tags / structured data — out of scope. Related: compliance-testing, playwright-automation, api-testing, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
The local task workspace, the build/test commands the hand-off gate runs, and the file and exploration tools. Use when starting work in a task workspace or before running any build, test or verification command.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run this skill at the very start of any new conversation or agent session before writing a single line of code. It loads the project's architectural decisions, conventions, known gotchas, and current task status so the agent operates with full context — not as a blank slate.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.