'sat' 검색 결과

Build Python features that identify a speaker’s intent and extract details such as names from conversation text using Azure. Get guidance on request structure, authentication, client cleanup, and exception handling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Adding intent detection to a Python application
• Extracting names and other details from conversation text
• Structuring requests for ConversationAnalysisClient

Turn exported AI chats and agent session logs into dated, searchable pages in gbrain. Check for missing conversations, extract facts, and trace when a topic first appeared or how an idea developed, with quotes and dated references.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Organizing exported AI chat histories
• Finding the first discussion of a topic
• Tracing how an idea developed

Connect a ChatGPT or Claude account to import conversation history into knowledge pages. Sync new and changed conversations incrementally, revisit recent history to catch updates, and optionally enable scheduled syncing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Importing ChatGPT conversation history
• Syncing Claude conversations into knowledge pages
• Keeping new and edited conversations up to date

Analyze customer recommendation and satisfaction surveys, NPS and CSAT, from Google Sheets. Group comments into themes, explain weekly score changes and low-score drivers, and post a Slack digest with representative quotes without modifying survey data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Summarizing customer surveys each week
• Identifying recurring complaints behind low scores
• Comparing NPS or CSAT with the previous period

Collects every tweet in an X (Twitter) conversation thread given a conversation id (root tweet id) — the focal tweet plus all replies, sub-replies, and quote chains — and returns normalized per-tweet data with text, author, engagement counts, media, hashtags, mentions, in_reply_to mapping, and cursor for pagination. Use when user mentions Twitter conversation, X conversation thread, conversation_id, thread scraper, scrape Twitter replies, all replies to a tweet, replies under a tweet, sub-replies, nested replies, thread harvester, get replies of a tweet, scrape comments on Twitter, scrape comments on X, full thread extraction, conversation export, conversation tree, reply chain, thread dump, X tweet thread, twitter thread scrape, comment scraping twitter, comment scraping x, focal tweet plus context, root tweet plus replies. Also applies to sentiment analysis on a single viral tweet, controversy mapping, harvesting community Q&A threads, capturing AMA threads, recovering long-running discussions, and any paginated bulk reply collection driven by a conversation id.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review AI agent spending by conversation, with each session’s start time, message count, main model, and total cost. Use the results to identify expensive sessions and understand typical costs before planning longer work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review spending across completed conversations
• Identify conversations with high costs
• Estimate typical costs before a long session

Compare compensation with market benchmarks by role, level, and location. Analyze salary band placement, flag outliers and retention risks, and model equity grants, meaning share-based compensation, to support hiring offers and compensation reviews.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare a hiring offer with market compensation
• Review employee placement within salary bands
• Identify compensation outliers and retention risks

Locate BotProfile::LookAngleStiffnessAttacking in CS2 server.dll / libserver.so via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique signature or offset for the local gamedata entry "BotProfile::LookAngleStiffnessAttacking" (symbol BotProfile_LookAngleStiffnessAttacking). This is a VIRTUAL function - resolve the BotProfile::LookAngleStiffnessAttacking vtable via RTTI and identify the slot, then emit the slot. Verify by xrefs from expected call sites. vtable slots commonly differ between platforms - never assume identical indices. Trigger: BotProfile_LookAngleStiffnessAttacking, BotProfile::LookAngleStiffnessAttacking

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Draft, confirm, and post a single conversational reply to GitHub PR conversation comments (issue comments). The reply addresses all tracked items in one natural-prose message. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR conversation", "post PR conversation replies", or "draft PR conversation messages".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

侍酒师与葡萄酒 (侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。) Master OS — automated mastery of 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「侍酒师」「sommelier」「葡萄酒」「wine」「盲品」

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conversation patterns and interaction protocols for multi-agent systems. Covers request/response, pub/sub, blackboard, delegation chains, debate, critique, consensus, fan-out/fan-in, supervisor-worker, and peer negotiation. Deep analysis of AutoGen conversation patterns, CrewAI delegation, LangGraph state passing, and FIPA-ACL performatives. Teaches how to design what agents say to each other and in what order. Activate on: "agent conversation", "agent protocol", "multi-agent debate", "agent delegation", "supervisor worker pattern", "agent voting", "consensus protocol", "fan-out fan-in", "agent negotiation", "blackboard pattern", "agent dialogue", "conversation topology", "agent handoff". NOT for: wire format or serialization (use agent-interchange-formats), orchestration infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), single agent behavior (use agentic-patterns).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design and implement Saga workflows across services, using compensating actions to undo completed work after failures. Define step deadlines, handle repeated messages safely, and monitor stalled order, booking, or other long-running processes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Coordinating orders across inventory, payment, and shipping services
• Designing compensation for failed bookings
• Investigating workflows stuck during compensation

Design memory systems that help AI assistants retain conversation information and retrieve it when relevant. Explore short-term, long-term, and entity memory, along with memory consolidation, prompt integration, storage lifecycle management, and separation between users.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing an assistant that remembers across conversations
• Storing and updating facts about people or other entities
• Adding relevant memories to prompts

Create evaluation drafts for existing skills using actual conversations and user corrections. Produce criteria and repeatable test cases, distinguish evidence from specification assumptions, and prepare an anonymized draft for human review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turn user corrections into repeatable test cases
• Compare promised behavior with actual usage
• Draft an evaluation from conversation history

Turn JSON layout definitions into SVG or PNG images with Satori. Use this skill to create social sharing previews and cards, assemble standard layout and text components, or define custom components for image specifications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Creating social sharing preview images from JSON
• Building social cards with standard components
• Rendering AI-generated JSON image definitions

Request an owner’s permission to use a listed keychain credential needed by a command. An approval card appears in the conversation, and owner approval automatically reruns the blocked command with access shared across that conversation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Request permission for a credential needed by a command
• Resume a blocked command after its owner approves access
• Share approved access across sessions in one conversation

Build image conversations with LLaVA, a model that connects image recognition with language. This skill guides setup, image descriptions, visual questions, and follow-up conversations, with examples for Python, command-line use, and a Gradio interface.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build a chatbot that answers questions about images
• Write detailed descriptions of photos
• Ask follow-up questions about the same image

Create a new Claude Code session from the later half of the current conversation. Keep recent work while reducing conversation tokens, then receive a command to resume the copied session directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Continuing a long conversation with its later half
• Reducing tokens while keeping recent work
• Resuming a copied session with a direct command

Create a new Claude Code session containing only the last quarter of the current conversation. Preserve the most recent work, reduce conversation tokens, and get a command to resume the copied session directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Continuing with only the last quarter of a conversation
• Reducing tokens while keeping the most recent work
• Resuming a copied session with a direct command

Configure a new OpenRig agent seat, a managed place for an agent to run, using a prior Claude or Codex conversation. Covers fork settings, new session identities, and checks that distinguish forking from restoring.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Create a new agent seat from an earlier conversation
• Add conversation source settings to a rig expand payload
• Distinguish conversation forks from seat restoration

Implement Conversational Language Understanding (CLU) using the azure-ai-language-conversations Python SDK. Use when working with ConversationAnalysisClient to analyze conversation intent and entities, building NLP features, or integrating language understanding into applications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Corrects fluorophore spillover (conventional compensation) or spectral overlap (spectral unmixing) and applies variance-stabilizing transforms (logicle/biexponential, arcsinh, log) for flow and mass cytometry. Covers spillover-matrix estimation from single-stain controls, AutoSpill, the spillover spreading matrix and why panel design (not compensation) bounds resolution, compensate-then-transform ordering, and arcsinh cofactor choice (5 for CyTOF, ~150 for fluorescence, per-channel via flowVS). Use when correcting spectral overlap, preparing data for gating/clustering, choosing logicle vs arcsinh, deciding a cofactor, or distinguishing compensation from spectral unmixing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designing conversational flows for website chatbots and AI agents. Intent recognition architecture, branching logic, fallback handling, escalation to human, conversation analytics. Honest about scripted-bot (rigid trees, fail edge cases), hallucinating-bot (LLM without structure, makes things up), and structured-guided-conversation (LLM-powered with intent architecture and fallback discipline) patterns. Distinguishes chatbot DESIGN (this skill) from chatbot IMPLEMENTATION (engineering and platform work). Triggers on chatbot, conversational AI, AI agent, chat widget, intent design, conversational flow, bot escalation, LLM grounding. Also triggers when a chatbot is hallucinating, when a scripted bot is failing edge cases, or when a chatbot is being scoped for the first time.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Classifies data as pseudonymised or anonymised using Recital 26 reasonably likely test, Breyer ruling C-582/14, motivated intruder test, and WP29 Opinion 05/2014 on anonymisation techniques. Covers singling out, linkability, and inference tests. Keywords: pseudonymisation, anonymisation, Recital 26, re-identification, k-anonymity, differential privacy, WP29 Opinion 05/2014.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.