408건 · 관련도순
Screen study titles, abstracts, and full texts against confirmed eligibility rules. Two AI reviewers assess records separately, with a third resolving conflicts, while outputs document exclusion reasons, selection counts, and the methods used.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Screen research papers against a research question using six scoring dimensions. Choose criteria for a broad knowledge collection or a systematic review, then receive inclusion, exclusion, and human-review lists with evidence quotes checked against abstracts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate a spreadsheet of test entries — newly designated names from OFAC, OFSI, and EU sanctions lists plus deliberate variations of those names — to validate that a sanctions screening system catches fresh designations and is tuned to the right fuzziness threshold. Use this whenever the user asks for sanctions list update test data, screening regression test data, screening QA, fuzzy match calibration, or wants to verify their screening lists are current. Trigger even if the user doesn't say 'screening' explicitly — phrases like 'test my sanctions list', 'check our SDN coverage', 'is my list up to date', or 'build me a regression set from the latest designations' should also invoke this skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35. Applies the EDPB WP248rev.01 nine-criteria test, national supervisory authority blacklists, and organisational risk appetite to produce a documented screening decision. Keywords: threshold screening, DPIA trigger, pre-DPIA, WP248, Article 35(1), blacklist, screening decision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Screen and evaluate A-share investment opportunities. Adapts the original deal-screening skill for Chinese market data sources, A-share screening criteria, and domestic deal origination. Triggers on "A股标的筛选", "标的筛选", "screening China", "deal screening A-share", "筛选投资标的", or "screen for [criteria]".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a new product feature, vendor, AI use, monitoring tool or change in processing raises the question "do we need a DPIA", or someone asks "DPIA screening", "is this high risk processing", "data protection impact assessment threshold", "privacy impact screening for this feature", "does our AI feature need a DPIA" or "document why we did not do a DPIA". Describes the processing with numbers, tests it against the GDPR cases, the supervisory authority's list and the EDPB-endorsed criteria, reaches a reasoned outcome (required, recommended, not required) with a re-screen trigger, and keeps a screening log for accountability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build and test scoring criteria for selecting relevant research papers. Refine the rules against your judgments, screen large sets of abstracts, and reassess saved papers when criteria change, with records of scores and revisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs structure-based virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, SMINA, GNINA (CNN scoring), and DiffDock-L hybrid workflows with explicit choice rules across rigid vs flexible docking, cross-docking vs self-docking, binding-site detection (P2Rank, fpocket), receptor preparation (PDB2PQR, PROPKA), ligand preparation (meeko, OpenBabel), and ultralarge-library screening (ZINC22, Enamine REAL). Use when screening chemical libraries against a protein target to find candidate binders, ranking docking poses, or selecting a docking workflow for a specific scenario.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Order and interpret lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] measurement at least once in a lifetime, apply the risk-enhancer threshold (≥125 nmol/L or ≥50 mg/dL), and run cascade screening of first-degree relatives for premature ASCVD, familial hypercholesterolaemia, or elevated Lp(a) per the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline. Covers the Class 1 lifetime measurement, how elevated Lp(a) affects LLT initiation and intensification, the cascade screening indications, the interaction of Lp(a) with ASCVD risk estimation, and current therapeutic limitations. Use when a clinician asks when to check Lp(a), how often to repeat Lp(a), elevated Lp(a) what next, treatment for high Lp(a), should I screen my patient's family, Lp(a) and statins, cascade screening indications. Grounded in the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs structure-based virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, SMINA, GNINA (CNN scoring), and DiffDock-L hybrid workflows with explicit choice rules across rigid vs flexible docking, cross-docking vs self-docking, binding-site detection (P2Rank, fpocket), receptor preparation (PDB2PQR, PROPKA), ligand preparation (meeko, OpenBabel), and ultralarge-library screening (ZINC22, Enamine REAL). Use when screening chemical libraries against a protein target to find candidate binders, ranking docking poses, or selecting a docking workflow for a specific scenario.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs structure-based virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, SMINA, GNINA (CNN scoring), and DiffDock-L hybrid workflows with explicit choice rules across rigid vs flexible docking, cross-docking vs self-docking, binding-site detection (P2Rank, fpocket), receptor preparation (PDB2PQR, PROPKA), ligand preparation (meeko, OpenBabel), and ultralarge-library screening (ZINC22, Enamine REAL). Use when screening chemical libraries against a protein target to find candidate binders, ranking docking poses, or selecting a docking workflow for a specific scenario.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs structure-based virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, SMINA, GNINA (CNN scoring), and DiffDock-L hybrid workflows with explicit choice rules across rigid vs flexible docking, cross-docking vs self-docking, binding-site detection (P2Rank, fpocket), receptor preparation (PDB2PQR, PROPKA), ligand preparation (meeko, OpenBabel), and ultralarge-library screening (ZINC22, Enamine REAL). Use when screening chemical libraries against a protein target to find candidate binders, ranking docking poses, or selecting a docking workflow for a specific scenario.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Screen incoming investment opportunities against a fund’s criteria using company sale memoranda, short deal summaries, or broker materials. Extract financials and risks, assess fit, and produce a one-page memo with a recommendation and first-call questions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Extract identity, ownership, control, and source-of-funds details from investor or client onboarding documents into a structured JSON record. Inventory the submitted documents and flag obvious missing or expired items before passing the information to KYC screening rules.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare raw credit data for pre-loan modeling by checking data quality and screening variables. Review missing values, predictive usefulness, stability, noise, and correlation, then export an Excel report with organization-level statistics and cleaning results.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Coordinate multiple helper agents to screen large paper collections, extract detailed findings, and explore citations. Consolidate structured results into review records and summaries, while checking coverage, duplicate entries, and consistency in relevance scoring.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Navigate a structured literature review workflow in Claude Code, from finding and screening papers to extracting results and following citations. Learn which related skills to use and how to organize findings, PDFs, and duplicate tracking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when screening differentially expressed genes from a bulk expression matrix between two user-specified groups, producing DEG tables, a volcano plot, and a clustered heatmap. Triggers include DEG analysis, volcano plot, clustered heatmap, limma-based two-group comparison, and case-vs-control screening. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, multi-group contrasts, count-model workflows such as DESeq2/edgeR, or non-expression omics data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rapid NDA screening with GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification. 10-point checklist for incoming NDAs. Use when triaging NDAs, screening non-disclosure agreements, or routing NDAs for approval.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides the Privacy Threshold Analysis screening process to determine whether a full DPIA is required. Provides a quick-screen questionnaire, threshold criteria based on WP248rev.01, escalation triggers, and documentation requirements. Activate when evaluating new processing activities, system changes, or procurement decisions. Keywords: PTA, privacy threshold analysis, DPIA screening, quick-screen, threshold criteria, WP248, escalation triggers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manages privacy compliance for employee background checks including criminal record processing under Art. 10 GDPR, DBS checks (UK), national law variations, and reference verification. Applies proportionality and data minimisation to pre-employment screening, defines retention limits, and addresses role-based necessity assessments. Keywords: background check, criminal record, Art. 10, DBS, pre-employment screening, vetting, data minimisation, proportionality.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find Amazon same-niche competitors by ASIN, with multi-dimensional filtering by click conversion rate, composite conversion rate, click volume, sales volume, reviews, ratings, price, and gross margin to identify potential competitors. Triggered when users mention same-niche competitors, ASIN competitor mining, niche competitor analysis, similar product benchmarking, ASIN benchmarking, niche market competitor list, high-conversion competitor screening, Nexscope product mining, niche competitor by ASIN, ASIN competitor analysis, same niche products, similar products discovery, conversion rate comparison, potential competitor screening, Nexscope ASIN mining. Even if users do not explicitly mention "niche" or "same niche", this skill should be triggered whenever the task involves discovering competitor lists or screening potential competitors based on a specific ASIN within the same market segment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Recommends antihypertensive therapy including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) for patients with a positive primary aldosteronism (PA) screening test who decline confirmatory testing. Triggers include when a patient has positive screening but refuses additional tests and asks "What should I treat with?" or initiates empiric therapy, with preference for MRAs in typical PA presentations (e.g., spontaneous hypokalemia, resistant hypertension, adrenal tumor on CT).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.