'theoretical' 검색 결과

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Derive a theoretical result step-by-step from first principles or established theorems, with every step explicitly justified and special cases checked. Use when deriving a formula or theorem from first principles, proving a mathematical statement by logical deduction, re-deriving a textbook result for verification or adaptation, extending a known result to a more general setting, or producing a self-contained derivation for a paper or thesis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

First-principles strategy — strip away conventional assumptions and find the theoretical maximum for your business. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full session (45+ min) to define your theoretical maximum, map the gap honestly, classify constraints, invert for failure modes, set strategic intent, and work backwards to your first intervention. Review mode (15-20 min) checks whether your theoretical maximum has shifted, whether the gap has changed, and whether you're still climbing the right peak. Alert mode defines constraint-shift, peak-shift, and local-peak triggers that tell you when to reassess. Use when someone is stuck optimising incrementally, when conventional wisdom is driving strategy, when a new technology or regulation changes what's physically possible, or when you suspect the business is climbing a local peak. Integrates with company-context.md. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Backtest stock and cryptocurrency option strategies using theoretical prices derived from underlying prices. Simulate combinations of option positions, track profit and loss, and export Greeks, measures of sensitivity to price, volatility, and time.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare covered call and protective put strategies
• Backtest straddles and iron condors
• Analyze theoretical option prices and sensitivities

A first step in the data analysis of Mass Spectrometry (MS) based proteomics data is to identify peptides and proteins. With this respect the huge number of experimental mass spectra typically have to be assigned to theoretical peptides derived from a sequence database. Search engines are used for this purpose. These tools compare each of the observed spectra to all candidate theoretical spectra derived from the sequence data base and calculate a score for each comparison. The observed spectrum

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Apply Grounded Theory (Glaser and Strauss) to build theory inductively from qualitative data through open, axial, and selective coding. Use this skill when the user needs to develop new theory from data rather than test existing hypotheses, conduct theoretical sampling and constant comparison, determine when theoretical saturation is reached, or when they ask 'what theory explains this phenomenon', 'how do I code qualitative data systematically', or 'when do I stop collecting data'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze option strategies with profit and loss charts, breakeven points, and maximum risk calculations. Compare single options and combinations, and explore how underlying prices and volatility affect theoretical values for research and backtesting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing profit and loss across option strategies
• Calculating breakeven points and maximum profit or loss
• Exploring price and volatility scenarios

Approach engineering problems by checking assumptions, defining performance constraints, and choosing suitable tools before implementation. The skill guides algorithm analysis, complete code, performance optimization, and correctness checks through tests, assertions, or formal verification, meaning mathematical checks of correctness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking algorithm complexity and design assumptions
• Choosing languages for numerical or distributed systems
• Implementing concurrent code with explicit error handling

Draft a research paper section by section in LaTeX, a document typesetting format, using an outline and research materials. Apply venue formatting, incorporate figures, verify bibliography records, and check that repeated theoretical statements agree.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting paper sections from an outline and research findings
• Applying conference or IEEE paper formatting
• Checking bibliography metadata and removing uncited entries

Prepare Bugcrowd submissions with accurate vulnerability categories, evidence-based severity requests, and explanations of program scope. Structure references between related reports, document QA testing conditions, and draft responses when a finding is downgraded or considered out of scope.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choose a suitable Bugcrowd vulnerability category
• Explain a severity request using demonstrated impact
• Respond to out-of-scope decisions

Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation) Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X). Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation. Supports quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research, and systematic review automation. Language: English. Responds in Korean when user input is Korean. Triggers: research question, theoretical framework, hypothesis, literature review, meta-analysis, effect size, IRB, PRISMA, statistical analysis, sample size, bias, journal, peer review, conceptual framework, visualization, systematic review, qualitative, phenomenology, grounded theory, thematic analysis, mixed methods, interview, focus group, ethnography, action research, paper retrieval, AI screening, RAG builder, humanization, AI pattern detection

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Proofread academic papers in LaTeX through 19 sequential checks. Compare prose with table values, inspect citations and argument consistency, and suggest clearer wording. Review each proposed change individually before it is applied.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing reported results with tables and figures
• Checking citations against the bibliography
• Reviewing introduction logic and competing explanations

Review empirical economics papers using criteria modeled on leading journals. Examine causal reasoning, theoretical explanations, regression tables, figures, robustness, and contributions to prior research, then organize potential flaws by severity with concrete suggestions for revision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking an empirical economics paper before submission
• Independently reviewing a paper written with an agent
• Preparing to respond to reviewer comments

Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Render an interactive options payoff chart — expiry P&L plus Black-Scholes theoretical value — with sliders for strikes, premium, IV, DTE, and spot. Use this skill whenever the user describes or shares an options position or strategy and wants to see how it makes or loses money: vertical, calendar, diagonal, or ratio spreads, butterflies, condors and iron condors, straddles, strangles, covered calls, protective or naked puts, or any multi-leg structure. This includes pasted strikes, premiums, and expiries, requests like "show me the payoff" or "draw the P&L curve", and broker screenshots (IBKR, TastyTrade, Robinhood). Use it even when details are partial — defaults fill the gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Options trading strategy analysis and simulation tool. Provides theoretical pricing using Black-Scholes model, Greeks calculation, strategy P/L simulation, and risk management guidance. Use when user requests options strategy analysis, covered calls, protective puts, spreads, iron condors, earnings plays, or options risk management. Includes volatility analysis, position sizing, and earnings-based strategy recommendations. Educational focus with practical trade simulation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript into a four-field contribution — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. AA rewards a portable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding or thick description alone. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses or write fieldnotes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when deciding whether a microeconomics project fits the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) rather than JET, GEB, Theoretical Economics, Econometrica, or AEJ: Applied. Tests scope and broad-interest fit; it does not develop the model (see aejmic-theory-model).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when judging whether a research idea fits Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) and has the *surprising* theoretical insight ASQ demands. Sharpens the puzzle and the contribution claim; it does not design the study or write theory sections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building the theoretical engine for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — mechanisms, process vs. variance logic, constructs, and boundary conditions. Builds the argument; it does not select methods or run analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when sharpening the theoretical contribution and the "so what" for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript once results exist. Frames the contribution; it does not develop the underlying theory or run analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.