본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

finding-replay-for-issue

Finds the most informative session recording linked to an error tracking issue. Use when a user has an error tracking issue ID and wants to watch a replay showing what the user was doing when the error occurred. Ranks linked sessions by recency, activity score, and journey completeness, then summarizes the pre-error context. Replaces blind session picking from potentially hundreds of linked recordings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Finding the best replay for an error tracking issue

When a user says "show me a replay for this error" or "find a recording for issue X", the goal isn't just any linked session — it's the one that best shows what led to the error. Popular issues can have hundreds of linked sessions, and most are crash-only fragments or duplicate occurrences. This skill picks the most useful one.

Available tools

ToolPurpose
posthog:query-error-tracking-issueGet issue details (fingerprint, status, volume)
posthog:execute-sqlQuery exception events to find linked sessions
posthog:query-session-recordings-listFetch recording metadata for candidate sessions
posthog:session-recording-getGet full details for the selected recording
posthog:vision-observations-listCheck for an existing Replay Vision AI summary
posthog:vision-scanners-listFind summarizer scanners (scanner_type=summarizer)
posthog:vision-scanners-scan-sessionRun a summarizer scanner on the recording (optional, slow)

Workflow

Step 1 — Get the issue details

Fetch the error tracking issue to understand what you're looking for:

posthog:query-error-tracking-issue
{
  "issueId": "<issue_id>"
}

Note the issue's fingerprint, name, and description — you'll need the fingerprint to find linked sessions.

Step 2 — Find sessions with this error

Query exception events to get session IDs where this error occurred. Order by recency and include basic context:

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    $session_id AS session_id,
    count() AS occurrences,
    min(timestamp) AS first_seen,
    max(timestamp) AS last_seen,
    any(properties.$current_url) AS url
FROM events
WHERE event = '$exception'
    AND properties.$exception_fingerprint = '<fingerprint>'
    AND $session_id IS NOT NULL
    AND timestamp > now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY session_id
ORDER BY last_seen DESC
LIMIT 20

This gives you up to 20 candidate sessions. More candidates means better selection.

Step 3 — Rank the candidates

Fetch recording metadata for the candidate sessions to rank them:

posthog:query-session-recordings-list
{
  "session_ids": ["<id1>", "<id2>", "<id3>", ...],
  "date_from": "-30d"
}

Pick the best recording by filtering out bad candidates, then ranking what's left:

Filter out:

  • Sessions under 10 seconds (crash-only fragments, no pre-error context)
  • Sessions over 1 hour (too much data to load, error is a needle in a haystack)

Rank by:

  1. Sweet-spot duration — 2-15 minutes is ideal. Long enough to show the user's journey before the error, short enough to be practical to watch or summarize.
  2. Active time ratio — compare active_seconds to recording_duration. A 20-minute recording with 10 seconds of activity is mostly idle tabs — the user walked away. Prefer sessions where active_seconds / recording_duration is above 0.3 (30%).
  3. Activity score — higher activity_score means the user was actively interacting, not idle. More interesting to watch.
  4. Recency — more recent sessions reflect current app behavior.

Step 4 — Present the finding

Fetch full details for the selected recording:

posthog:session-recording-get
{
  "id": "<best_recording_id>"
}

Present to the user:

  • The recording with a link to watch it
  • Why this one — briefly explain the selection ("longest session with the error, user was browsing 3 pages before hitting it")
  • Pre-error context — what pages the user visited and key actions before the exception, derived from the events query in step 2 (the url and first_seen columns)
  • Error frequency — how many times the error occurred in this session

Optional: AI summary via Replay Vision

If the user wants a narrative summary without watching, use Replay Vision — "check-then-scan", since a scanner can only observe a given session once.

  1. Check for an existing summary on the selected recording:

    posthog:vision-observations-list
    {
      "session_id": "<best_recording_id>"
    }
    

    If an observation has scanner_snapshot.scanner_type summarizer and status succeeded, read scanner_result.model_output (title, summary, intent, outcome, friction_points, keywords) — done.

  2. Find a summarizer scanner if none exists:

    posthog:vision-scanners-list
    {
      "scanner_type": "summarizer"
    }
    

    One → use it. More than one → ask the user which (show name + prompt). None → offer to create one via the creating-replay-vision-scanners skill.

  3. Scan the recording with the chosen scanner (async, several minutes):

    posthog:vision-scanners-scan-session
    {
      "id": "<scanner_id>",
      "session_id": "<best_recording_id>"
    }
    
  4. Retrieve by polling vision-observations-list until succeeded.

Tips

  • If all candidate sessions are very short (<10 seconds), the error likely crashes the page immediately. Note this — it's useful context even without a long replay.
  • When the issue has very few linked sessions (<3), skip the ranking and just present what's available with a note about the small sample.
  • If $session_id is null on many exception events, session replay may not be enabled for the affected users. Mention this as a possible gap.
  • Replay Vision has no per-call focus parameter — a summarizer scanner's focus comes from its own prompt. For error-focused summaries, prefer (or create) a summarizer scanner whose prompt targets error/exception context rather than the whole session.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use Cursor's browser aria snapshots to audit a page for accessibility issues — missing labels, broken tab order, contrast, and ARIA misuse.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test42026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Add PostHog analytics to a web application, including event tracking, page views, feature flags, and session replay.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test42026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Generate OpenAPI/Swagger documentation for an API, including endpoint schemas, request/response types, and interactive docs UI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test42026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Add authentication to a web application using NextAuth.js (Auth.js), including OAuth providers, session management, and protected routes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test42026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Dockerize an application with a production-ready Dockerfile, docker-compose setup, and .dockerignore.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test42026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Set up Playwright end-to-end testing in a project, including test configuration, example tests, and CI integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test42026년 9월 4일 업데이트

0xAidan의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고