본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

domain-authority-auditor

Assess a domain's trust and credibility as a citation source against a defined group of comparable sites. Review 40 evidence-based checks covering links, identity, trust, and visibility, with clear evidence gaps, verified risks, and recommended fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Assess a domain's credibility as a citation source
  • Establish a trust baseline against comparable sites
  • Review evidence of link manipulation or search penalties
  • Identify evidence gaps and prioritize improvements

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md9.6 KB
  • references/auditor-runtime.md19.9 KB
  • references/example-report.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Domain Authority Auditor

Audit one domain's citation-trust signals relative to a declared peer cohort. Produce a complete CITE score only when all applicable evidence and comparison context are present. CITE is advisory; it does not predict whether an answer engine will cite the domain.

When This Must Trigger

  • The user asks whether a domain is trustworthy, authoritative, or citation-ready.
  • A campaign needs a peer-relative CITE baseline or rerun.
  • Link, entity, penalty, or citation evidence may materially change a domain gate.

Quick Start

Audit example.com against these five same-stage U.S. SaaS peers.
Run the CITE content-publisher profile; mark every private-data gap Unknown.

Skill Contract

Use offsite-signal-analyzer for link diagnosis without a gate, content-quality-auditor for one page, and entity-registry for canonical entity repair. Compare multiple domains as separate same-profile runs; never score them as one pooled target.

Reads: one domain, one locked cohort, and dated citation/identity/trust/eminence evidence. Writes: only a permissioned v3 artifact. Done when: context is complete, all 40 states are explicit, the scorer result is preserved, and any saved artifact validates.

Instructions

Runtime Reads

  • ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md
  • ../../../references/scoring-semantics.md
  • ../../../references/cite-domain-rating.md
  • ../../../references/framework-catalog.json
  • ../../../references/runtime-invocation.md
  • references/auditor-runtime.md

Runtime Contract

Read ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, cite-domain-rating.md, and the CITE entry in framework-catalog.json. For standalone installs, use bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md; never fetch mutable main or guess missing policy. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.

Required Setup

Declare:

  • one canonical domain and observation date;
  • market and entity stage;
  • domain type/profile: default, content-publisher, product-service, ecommerce, community-ugc, tool-utility, or authority-institutional;
  • a locked peer cohort with inclusion rules and evidence window.

Without peer cohort, market, stage, or domain type, return NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED; the inherited numeric anchors are diagnostic priors, not universal thresholds.

Data Sources

NeedPreferred evidence
LinksDated backlink export/index with known coverage
IdentityStructured data, canonical profiles, knowledge-graph/public entity evidence
TrustLink-history comparison, security checks, authorized console evidence
EminenceSearch/analytics visibility and locked peer/query panels
CohortNamed domains plus inclusion/exclusion, market, stage, type, and window

Evidence Procedure

  1. Normalize the domain and verify scope (host/subdomain/protocol treatment).
  2. Freeze backlink, entity, security, search visibility, citation-panel, and reputation evidence with sources/dates.
  3. Evaluate all 40 IDs against the declared cohort. Tool estimates remain estimated or proxy; user exports remain user-provided unless independently verified.
  4. Use Unknown for absent backlink indexes, private console data, or comparison universes. Do not mark link-dependent items N/A simply because data is unavailable.
  5. Apply catalog-authorized N/A only with a reason, for example an AI-citation item when no locked panel is in scope.
  6. Verify vetoes positively:
    • CITE-T03: material link/traffic incoherence plus corroborating manipulation evidence relative to the cohort.
    • CITE-T05: verified manipulation network after common-source/ecosystem adjustment.
    • CITE-T09: verified active manual action or material unresolved deindexing.

Domain youth, privacy-protected WHOIS, low absolute volume, or missing private-console access cannot by themselves fail a veto.

Create a typed audit-run.schema.json input and execute python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json> when the verified runtime is available. Never renormalize weights around Unknown items.

Report

Begin with the auditor-runbook's exact typed conversation header. Never replace status, verdict, or score_state with prose; list each explicitly missing qualified item as ``ID: `unknown``` before findings.

Lead with verdict, profile/cohort/target/date, score or NOT_SCORED coverage/interval, and confidence. Then provide:

  • C/I/T/E score and coverage table;
  • peer-relative evidence and cohort definition;
  • verified risks versus unresolved Unknowns;
  • top fixes with owner, evidence needed, and rerun condition;
  • provenance appendix, including qualified IDs when detailed traceability is requested.

Use SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED as the canonical artifact verdict. User-facing prose may say trusted/cautious only as a descriptive translation, never as a separate decision system.

Verdict Rules

  • Complete, no veto, healthy score/no failures: DONE + SHIP.
  • Complete, remediation needed or one veto: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS + FIX; one veto caps final at 59.
  • Complete, 2+ verified vetoes: DONE + BLOCK; no final score.
  • Missing applicable/cohort evidence: NEEDS_INPUT + UNDECIDED; no score.

Route link investigation to offsite-signal-analyzer, technical/index evidence to technical-seo-checker, entity repair to entity-registry, and page quality to content-quality-auditor.

§2 CITE Worked Examples

  • Complete product-service profile, raw 78, one verified T09 failure: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59.
  • Complete profile, raw 45, one verified T05 failure: final remains 45; the ceiling never raises a score.
  • Verified T03 and T05 failures with complete evidence: DONE/BLOCK, raw retained, no final score.
  • Missing backlink universe or private-console evidence: affected items are Unknown and no total is emitted.

§3 CITE Guardrails

  • Young domain age and WHOIS privacy are neutral without contradictory evidence.
  • A press/launch spike can explain link velocity; test the explanation before labeling manipulation.
  • Absolute volume is interpreted within peer cohort, entity stage, market, and domain type.
  • Public index absence does not prove a private manual action; T09 requires positive evidence.

§5 CITE Translation

Use plain descriptions by default. On a trace request, show CITE-T03, CITE-T05, and CITE-T09 with source/date/cohort; never expose an unqualified ID.

Persistence

Persist only after explicit authorization. Assemble the complete v3 draft, validate it against the intended memory/audits/domain/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Use:

python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/validate-audit-artifact.py" <draft> --relative-path <target>

The audit request itself does not authorize hot-cache, candidate, or registry writes.

Validation Checkpoints

  • Target/profile/market/stage/cohort are explicit and locked.
  • All 40 IDs have evidence-backed state, Unknown, or valid N/A.
  • Absolute anchors were not applied as cohort-independent laws.
  • Vetoes are verified failures, not absence-of-evidence shortcuts.
  • Scorer output, coverage, confidence, status, and verdict are preserved.
  • Persisted artifact is permissioned, path-correct, minimized, and validator-clean.

Reference Materials

Next Best Skill

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit paid advertising accounts before increasing spend by comparing campaign exports with your own sales or lead records. Review 20 criteria covering measurement, spending, and safety, then receive a decision and prioritized fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review an ad account before increasing its budget
  • Check reported ad returns against sales and lead records
  • Identify wasted spend and prioritize measurement fixes
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills3천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Create paid-ad headlines, descriptions, and opening hooks that match the destination page. Build a matrix of messaging angles and variants, check format limits, and flag unsupported claims or policy risks before handing the set off for review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Drafting responsive search ad headlines and descriptions
  • Comparing ad angles and opening hooks
  • Replacing weak headlines while keeping successful ones
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills3천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Plan advertising and landing page experiments with a clear hypothesis, controlled variants, sample sizes, and duration. Interpret exported results by separating statistical evidence from meaningful business impact, applying an action rule only when its owner approved it in advance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Plan an A/B test for landing page headlines
  • Estimate sample size and duration for an ad test
  • Assess effect size and uncertainty in exported test results
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills3천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design employee and founder sharing programs with voluntary participation, personalized share kits, disclosure lines, and staggered posting windows. Get roster and Slack or Teams distribution specifications, plus safeguards against identical coordinated posts and organized engagement exchanges.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Designing a voluntary employee sharing program
  • Preparing personalized launch share kits
  • Planning founder posts and disclosure lines
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills3천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Reconcile paid advertising conversions with GA4 or ecommerce order records. Identify duplicate and unmatched claims, align attribution windows and currencies, compare how models assign credit, and assess additional orders when test and control data are available.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Find sales claimed by both Meta and Google
  • Build a monthly conversion reconciliation workbook
  • Compare results across attribution models
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills3천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Turn customer interviews and won or lost deal notes into a map of buyer beliefs, recurring objections, and reasons to switch or stay. Each finding includes its evidence, with suggested ways to address objections and clear labels for assumptions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map buyer beliefs from customer interviews
  • Organize recurring sales objections and response angles
  • Identify reasons buyers switch or stay
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills3천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

aaron-he-zhu의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고