본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

cpp-testing

Create and repair C++ tests, configure GoogleTest and CTest, and investigate failures or inconsistent results. The workflow also covers measuring which code tests exercise and using runtime checks to detect memory errors and race conditions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Writing C++ unit and integration tests
  • Configuring GoogleTest and CTest
  • Investigating tests that fail inconsistently
  • Measuring coverage and checking memory errors

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

C++ Testing (Agent Skill)

Agent-focused testing workflow for modern C++ (C++17/20) using GoogleTest/GoogleMock with CMake/CTest.

When to Use

  • Writing new C++ tests or fixing existing tests
  • Designing unit/integration test coverage for C++ components
  • Adding test coverage, CI gating, or regression protection
  • Configuring CMake/CTest workflows for consistent execution
  • Investigating test failures or flaky behavior
  • Enabling sanitizers for memory/race diagnostics

When NOT to Use

  • Implementing new product features without test changes
  • Large-scale refactors unrelated to test coverage or failures
  • Performance tuning without test regressions to validate
  • Non-C++ projects or non-test tasks

Core Concepts

  • TDD loop: red → green → refactor (tests first, minimal fix, then cleanups).
  • Isolation: prefer dependency injection and fakes over global state.
  • Test layout: tests/unit, tests/integration, tests/testdata.
  • Mocks vs fakes: mock for interactions, fake for stateful behavior.
  • CTest discovery: use gtest_discover_tests() for stable test discovery.
  • CI signal: run subset first, then full suite with --output-on-failure.

TDD Workflow

Follow the RED → GREEN → REFACTOR loop:

  1. RED: write a failing test that captures the new behavior
  2. GREEN: implement the smallest change to pass
  3. REFACTOR: clean up while tests stay green
// tests/add_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>

int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.

TEST(AddTest, AddsTwoNumbers) { // RED
  EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}

// src/add.cpp
int Add(int a, int b) { // GREEN
  return a + b;
}

// REFACTOR: simplify/rename once tests pass

Code Examples

Basic Unit Test (gtest)

// tests/calculator_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>

int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.

TEST(CalculatorTest, AddsTwoNumbers) {
    EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}

Fixture (gtest)

// tests/user_store_test.cpp
// Pseudocode stub: replace UserStore/User with project types.
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <memory>
#include <optional>
#include <string>

struct User { std::string name; };
class UserStore {
public:
    explicit UserStore(std::string /*path*/) {}
    void Seed(std::initializer_list<User> /*users*/) {}
    std::optional<User> Find(const std::string &/*name*/) { return User{"alice"}; }
};

class UserStoreTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
    void SetUp() override {
        store = std::make_unique<UserStore>(":memory:");
        store->Seed({{"alice"}, {"bob"}});
    }

    std::unique_ptr<UserStore> store;
};

TEST_F(UserStoreTest, FindsExistingUser) {
    auto user = store->Find("alice");
    ASSERT_TRUE(user.has_value());
    EXPECT_EQ(user->name, "alice");
}

Mock (gmock)

// tests/notifier_test.cpp
#include <gmock/gmock.h>
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <string>

class Notifier {
public:
    virtual ~Notifier() = default;
    virtual void Send(const std::string &message) = 0;
};

class MockNotifier : public Notifier {
public:
    MOCK_METHOD(void, Send, (const std::string &message), (override));
};

class Service {
public:
    explicit Service(Notifier &notifier) : notifier_(notifier) {}
    void Publish(const std::string &message) { notifier_.Send(message); }

private:
    Notifier &notifier_;
};

TEST(ServiceTest, SendsNotifications) {
    MockNotifier notifier;
    Service service(notifier);

    EXPECT_CALL(notifier, Send("hello")).Times(1);
    service.Publish("hello");
}

CMake/CTest Quickstart

# CMakeLists.txt (excerpt)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.20)
project(example LANGUAGES CXX)

set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 20)
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON)

include(FetchContent)
# Prefer project-locked versions. If using a tag, use a pinned version per project policy.
set(GTEST_VERSION v1.17.0) # Adjust to project policy.
FetchContent_Declare(
  googletest
  # Google Test framework (official repository)
  URL https://github.com/google/googletest/archive/refs/tags/${GTEST_VERSION}.zip
)
FetchContent_MakeAvailable(googletest)

add_executable(example_tests
  tests/calculator_test.cpp
  src/calculator.cpp
)
target_link_libraries(example_tests GTest::gtest GTest::gmock GTest::gtest_main)

enable_testing()
include(GoogleTest)
gtest_discover_tests(example_tests)
cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
cmake --build build -j
ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure

Running Tests

ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure
ctest --test-dir build -R ClampTest
ctest --test-dir build -R "UserStoreTest.*" --output-on-failure
./build/example_tests --gtest_filter=ClampTest.*
./build/example_tests --gtest_filter=UserStoreTest.FindsExistingUser

Debugging Failures

  1. Re-run the single failing test with gtest filter.
  2. Add scoped logging around the failing assertion.
  3. Re-run with sanitizers enabled.
  4. Expand to full suite once the root cause is fixed.

Coverage

Prefer target-level settings instead of global flags.

option(ENABLE_COVERAGE "Enable coverage flags" OFF)

if(ENABLE_COVERAGE)
  if(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "GNU")
    target_compile_options(example_tests PRIVATE --coverage)
    target_link_options(example_tests PRIVATE --coverage)
  elseif(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "Clang")
    target_compile_options(example_tests PRIVATE -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping)
    target_link_options(example_tests PRIVATE -fprofile-instr-generate)
  endif()
endif()

GCC + gcov + lcov:

cmake -S . -B build-cov -DENABLE_COVERAGE=ON
cmake --build build-cov -j
ctest --test-dir build-cov
lcov --capture --directory build-cov --output-file coverage.info
lcov --remove coverage.info '/usr/*' --output-file coverage.info
genhtml coverage.info --output-directory coverage

Clang + llvm-cov:

cmake -S . -B build-llvm -DENABLE_COVERAGE=ON -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++
cmake --build build-llvm -j
LLVM_PROFILE_FILE="build-llvm/default.profraw" ctest --test-dir build-llvm
llvm-profdata merge -sparse build-llvm/default.profraw -o build-llvm/default.profdata
llvm-cov report build-llvm/example_tests -instr-profile=build-llvm/default.profdata

Sanitizers

option(ENABLE_ASAN "Enable AddressSanitizer" OFF)
option(ENABLE_UBSAN "Enable UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer" OFF)
option(ENABLE_TSAN "Enable ThreadSanitizer" OFF)

if(ENABLE_ASAN)
  add_compile_options(-fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer)
  add_link_options(-fsanitize=address)
endif()
if(ENABLE_UBSAN)
  add_compile_options(-fsanitize=undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer)
  add_link_options(-fsanitize=undefined)
endif()
if(ENABLE_TSAN)
  add_compile_options(-fsanitize=thread)
  add_link_options(-fsanitize=thread)
endif()

Flaky Tests Guardrails

  • Never use sleep for synchronization; use condition variables or latches.
  • Make temp directories unique per test and always clean them.
  • Avoid real time, network, or filesystem dependencies in unit tests.
  • Use deterministic seeds for randomized inputs.

Best Practices

DO

  • Keep tests deterministic and isolated
  • Prefer dependency injection over globals
  • Use ASSERT_* for preconditions, EXPECT_* for multiple checks
  • Separate unit vs integration tests in CTest labels or directories
  • Run sanitizers in CI for memory and race detection

DON'T

  • Don't depend on real time or network in unit tests
  • Don't use sleeps as synchronization when a condition variable can be used
  • Don't over-mock simple value objects
  • Don't use brittle string matching for non-critical logs

Common Pitfalls

  • Using fixed temp paths → Generate unique temp directories per test and clean them.
  • Relying on wall clock time → Inject a clock or use fake time sources.
  • Flaky concurrency tests → Use condition variables/latches and bounded waits.
  • Hidden global state → Reset global state in fixtures or remove globals.
  • Over-mocking → Prefer fakes for stateful behavior and only mock interactions.
  • Missing sanitizer runs → Add ASan/UBSan/TSan builds in CI.
  • Coverage on debug-only builds → Ensure coverage targets use consistent flags.

Optional Appendix: Fuzzing / Property Testing

Only use if the project already supports LLVM/libFuzzer or a property-testing library.

  • libFuzzer: best for pure functions with minimal I/O.
  • RapidCheck: property-based tests to validate invariants.

Minimal libFuzzer harness (pseudocode: replace ParseConfig):

#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdint>
#include <string>

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    std::string input(reinterpret_cast<const char *>(data), size);
    // ParseConfig(input); // project function
    return 0;
}

Alternatives to GoogleTest

  • Catch2: header-only, expressive matchers
  • doctest: lightweight, minimal compile overhead

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 5일 업데이트

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

affaan-m의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고