본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개한국어 소개

flutter-dart-code-review

Flutter/Dart 코드를 상태 관리 라이브러리의 관례에 맞춰 검토합니다. 화면 구성과 비동기 처리부터 성능, 테스트, 접근성, 보안까지 점검합니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture. Use when reviewing Flutter or Dart code, whatever state management library the project uses.

연동 도구Sentry
AI 평가90점/ 100설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • 출시 전 Flutter 앱을 검토합니다
  • 상태 관리 설계를 확인합니다
  • 불필요한 화면 재빌드를 조사합니다
  • 접근성과 보안을 점검합니다

한국어 소개

할 수 있는 일

Flutter/Dart 코드를 설계부터 화면 사용성까지 폭넓게 검토합니다. 화면 구성 요소인 위젯의 분할, 비동기 처리, 상태 관리, 테스트, 보안 등을 확인하는 항목을 제공합니다. BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals 등 사용하는 라이브러리의 관례에 맞춰 점검합니다.

이럴 때 유용합니다

출시 전에 점검 누락을 줄이거나 기존 앱의 설계를 다시 살펴볼 때 적합합니다. 불필요한 화면 재빌드, 구독 해제 누락, 로딩·성공·오류 상태의 표현도 확인합니다. 다국어 지원과 화면 읽기 프로그램에 대한 배려를 포함해 검토 기준을 맞추려는 팀에도 도움이 됩니다.

사용 예시

  • “이 Flutter 앱을 검토하고 설계, 성능, 보안 문제를 지적해 주세요.”
  • “Riverpod 사용 방식과 비동기 처리 후의 화면 조작을 확인해 주세요.”
  • “테스트와 접근성 점검에서 빠진 항목을 찾아 주세요.”

주의 사항

Flutter/Dart 코드가 대상입니다. 상태 관리나 화면 전환 라이브러리를 하나로 제한하지 않고 프로젝트에서 채택한 방식의 관례에 따라 판단합니다. 의존 패키지의 라이선스 호환성과 지원 플랫폼도 점검 항목에 포함됩니다.

이 소개문은 공개된 SKILL.md를 바탕으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 작성했습니다. 정확한 사양은 아래 원문을 확인하세요.

객관 평가

AI가 SKILL.md의 내용만을 근거로 4가지 관점에서 판정했습니다. 스타 수나 인기도는 판정에 넣지 않았습니다.

지시의 명확성언제 쓰고 무엇을 하는지 알 수 있는가
A양호Flutter/Dart 검토 용도와 위젯, 상태 관리 등의 점검 대상을 명시합니다.
절차의 구체성절차·입출력·예시가 구체적으로 적혀 있는가
B일부 부족제공된 부분에 구체적인 점검 항목과 코드 예시가 있지만 검토 결과 형식은 없습니다.
안전성전송·삭제·명령 실행 등을 명시하고 있는가
A양호제공된 부분은 코드 점검 항목이며 외부 전송이나 파일 삭제 등의 실행 지시는 없습니다.
도입의 용이성필요한 도구나 API 키가 적고 적혀 있는가
A양호Flutter/Dart 코드가 대상이며 제공된 부분에 추가 도구나 API 키의 필수 지정은 없습니다.

총점은 각 항목을 A=25점, B=15점, C=5점으로 더한 값입니다. 2026년 10월 19일 기준으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 판정했습니다. 참고용이므로 설치 전에 원문도 확인해 주세요.

평가가 다르다고 생각되면 재검토를 요청하기

어느 항목이 왜 다르다고 생각하는지 적어 주세요. 로그인은 필요 없습니다. SKILL.md와 대조해 평가를 다시 만들고 이곳에 반영합니다.

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md22.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Flutter/Dart Code Review Best Practices

Comprehensive, library-agnostic checklist for reviewing Flutter/Dart applications. These principles apply regardless of which state management solution, routing library, or DI framework is used.


1. General Project Health

  • Project follows consistent folder structure (feature-first or layer-first)
  • Proper separation of concerns: UI, business logic, data layers
  • No business logic in widgets; widgets are purely presentational
  • pubspec.yaml is clean — no unused dependencies, versions pinned appropriately
  • analysis_options.yaml includes a strict lint set with strict analyzer settings enabled
  • No print() statements in production code — use dart:developer log() or a logging package
  • Generated files (.g.dart, .freezed.dart, .gr.dart) are up-to-date or in .gitignore
  • Platform-specific code isolated behind abstractions

2. Dart Language Pitfalls

  • Implicit dynamic: Missing type annotations leading to dynamic — enable strict-casts, strict-inference, strict-raw-types
  • Null safety misuse: Excessive ! (bang operator) instead of proper null checks or Dart 3 pattern matching (if (value case var v?))
  • Type promotion failures: Using this.field where local variable promotion would work
  • Catching too broadly: catch (e) without on clause; always specify exception types
  • Catching Error: Error subtypes indicate bugs and should not be caught
  • Unused async: Functions marked async that never await — unnecessary overhead
  • late overuse: late used where nullable or constructor initialization would be safer; defers errors to runtime
  • String concatenation in loops: Use StringBuffer instead of + for iterative string building
  • Mutable state in const contexts: Fields in const constructor classes should not be mutable
  • Ignoring Future return values: Use await or explicitly call unawaited() to signal intent
  • var where final works: Prefer final for locals and const for compile-time constants
  • Relative imports: Use package: imports for consistency
  • Mutable collections exposed: Public APIs should return unmodifiable views, not raw List/Map
  • Missing Dart 3 pattern matching: Prefer switch expressions and if-case over verbose is checks and manual casting
  • Throwaway classes for multiple returns: Use Dart 3 records (String, int) instead of single-use DTOs
  • print() in production code: Use dart:developer log() or the project's logging package; print() has no log levels and cannot be filtered

3. Widget Best Practices

Widget decomposition:

  • No single widget with a build() method exceeding ~80-100 lines
  • Widgets split by encapsulation AND by how they change (rebuild boundaries)
  • Private _build*() helper methods that return widgets are extracted to separate widget classes (enables element reuse, const propagation, and framework optimizations)
  • Stateless widgets preferred over Stateful where no mutable local state is needed
  • Extracted widgets are in separate files when reusable

Const usage:

  • const constructors used wherever possible — prevents unnecessary rebuilds
  • const literals for collections that don't change (const [], const {})
  • Constructor is declared const when all fields are final

Key usage:

  • ValueKey used in lists/grids to preserve state across reorders
  • GlobalKey used sparingly — only when accessing state across the tree is truly needed
  • UniqueKey avoided in build() — it forces rebuild every frame
  • ObjectKey used when identity is based on a data object rather than a single value

Theming & design system:

  • Colors come from Theme.of(context).colorScheme — no hardcoded Colors.red or hex values
  • Text styles come from Theme.of(context).textTheme — no inline TextStyle with raw font sizes
  • Dark mode compatibility verified — no assumptions about light background
  • Spacing and sizing use consistent design tokens or constants, not magic numbers

Build method complexity:

  • No network calls, file I/O, or heavy computation in build()
  • No Future.then() or async work in build()
  • No subscription creation (.listen()) in build()
  • setState() localized to smallest possible subtree

4. State Management (Library-Agnostic)

These principles apply to all Flutter state management solutions (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals, ValueNotifier, etc.).

Architecture:

  • Business logic lives outside the widget layer — in a state management component (BLoC, Notifier, Controller, Store, ViewModel, etc.)
  • State managers receive dependencies via injection, not by constructing them internally
  • A service or repository layer abstracts data sources — widgets and state managers should not call APIs or databases directly
  • State managers have a single responsibility — no "god" managers handling unrelated concerns
  • Cross-component dependencies follow the solution's conventions:
    • In Riverpod: providers depending on providers via ref.watch is expected — flag only circular or overly tangled chains
    • In BLoC: blocs should not directly depend on other blocs — prefer shared repositories or presentation-layer coordination
    • In other solutions: follow the documented conventions for inter-component communication

Immutability & value equality (for immutable-state solutions: BLoC, Riverpod, Redux):

  • State objects are immutable — new instances created via copyWith() or constructors, never mutated in-place
  • State classes implement == and hashCode properly (all fields included in comparison)
  • Mechanism is consistent across the project — manual override, Equatable, freezed, Dart records, or other
  • Collections inside state objects are not exposed as raw mutable List/Map

Reactivity discipline (for reactive-mutation solutions: MobX, GetX, Signals):

  • State is only mutated through the solution's reactive API (@action in MobX, .value on signals, .obs in GetX) — direct field mutation bypasses change tracking
  • Derived values use the solution's computed mechanism rather than being stored redundantly
  • Reactions and disposers are properly cleaned up (ReactionDisposer in MobX, effect cleanup in Signals)

State shape design:

  • Mutually exclusive states use sealed types, union variants, or the solution's built-in async state type (e.g. Riverpod's AsyncValue) — not boolean flags (isLoading, isError, hasData)
  • Every async operation models loading, success, and error as distinct states
  • All state variants are handled exhaustively in UI — no silently ignored cases
  • Error states carry error information for display; loading states don't carry stale data
  • Nullable data is not used as a loading indicator — states are explicit
// BAD — boolean flag soup allows impossible states
class UserState {
  bool isLoading = false;
  bool hasError = false; // isLoading && hasError is representable!
  User? user;
}

// GOOD (immutable approach) — sealed types make impossible states unrepresentable
sealed class UserState {}
class UserInitial extends UserState {}
class UserLoading extends UserState {}
class UserLoaded extends UserState {
  final User user;
  const UserLoaded(this.user);
}
class UserError extends UserState {
  final String message;
  const UserError(this.message);
}

// GOOD (reactive approach) — observable enum + data, mutations via reactivity API
// enum UserStatus { initial, loading, loaded, error }
// Use your solution's observable/signal to wrap status and data separately

Rebuild optimization:

  • State consumer widgets (Builder, Consumer, Observer, Obx, Watch, etc.) scoped as narrow as possible
  • Selectors used to rebuild only when specific fields change — not on every state emission
  • const widgets used to stop rebuild propagation through the tree
  • Computed/derived state is calculated reactively, not stored redundantly

Subscriptions & disposal:

  • All manual subscriptions (.listen()) are cancelled in dispose() / close()
  • Stream controllers are closed when no longer needed
  • Timers are cancelled in disposal lifecycle
  • Framework-managed lifecycle is preferred over manual subscription (declarative builders over .listen())
  • mounted check before setState in async callbacks
  • BuildContext not used after await without checking context.mounted (Flutter 3.7+) — stale context causes crashes
  • No navigation, dialogs, or scaffold messages after async gaps without verifying the widget is still mounted
  • BuildContext never stored in singletons, state managers, or static fields

Local vs global state:

  • Ephemeral UI state (checkbox, slider, animation) uses local state (setState, ValueNotifier)
  • Shared state is lifted only as high as needed — not over-globalized
  • Feature-scoped state is properly disposed when the feature is no longer active

5. Performance

Unnecessary rebuilds:

  • setState() not called at root widget level — localize state changes
  • const widgets used to stop rebuild propagation
  • RepaintBoundary used around complex subtrees that repaint independently
  • AnimatedBuilder child parameter used for subtrees independent of animation

Expensive operations in build():

  • No sorting, filtering, or mapping large collections in build() — compute in state management layer
  • No regex compilation in build()
  • MediaQuery.of(context) usage is specific (e.g., MediaQuery.sizeOf(context))

Image optimization:

  • Network images use caching (any caching solution appropriate for the project)
  • Appropriate image resolution for target device (no loading 4K images for thumbnails)
  • Image.asset with cacheWidth/cacheHeight to decode at display size
  • Placeholder and error widgets provided for network images

Lazy loading:

  • ListView.builder / GridView.builder used instead of ListView(children: [...]) for large or dynamic lists (concrete constructors are fine for small, static lists)
  • Pagination implemented for large data sets
  • Deferred loading (deferred as) used for heavy libraries in web builds

Other:

  • Opacity widget avoided in animations — use AnimatedOpacity or FadeTransition
  • Clipping avoided in animations — pre-clip images
  • operator == not overridden on widgets — use const constructors instead
  • Intrinsic dimension widgets (IntrinsicHeight, IntrinsicWidth) used sparingly (extra layout pass)

6. Testing

Test types and expectations:

  • Unit tests: Cover all business logic (state managers, repositories, utility functions)
  • Widget tests: Cover individual widget behavior, interactions, and visual output
  • Integration tests: Cover critical user flows end-to-end
  • Golden tests: Pixel-perfect comparisons for design-critical UI components

Coverage targets:

  • Aim for 80%+ line coverage on business logic
  • All state transitions have corresponding tests (loading → success, loading → error, retry, etc.)
  • Edge cases tested: empty states, error states, loading states, boundary values

Test isolation:

  • External dependencies (API clients, databases, services) are mocked or faked
  • Each test file tests exactly one class/unit
  • Tests verify behavior, not implementation details
  • Stubs define only the behavior needed for each test (minimal stubbing)
  • No shared mutable state between test cases

Widget test quality:

  • pumpWidget and pump used correctly for async operations
  • find.byType, find.text, find.byKey used appropriately
  • No flaky tests depending on timing — use pumpAndSettle or explicit pump(Duration)
  • Tests run in CI and failures block merges

7. Accessibility

Semantic widgets:

  • Semantics widget used to provide screen reader labels where automatic labels are insufficient
  • ExcludeSemantics used for purely decorative elements
  • MergeSemantics used to combine related widgets into a single accessible element
  • Images have semanticLabel property set

Screen reader support:

  • All interactive elements are focusable and have meaningful descriptions
  • Focus order is logical (follows visual reading order)

Visual accessibility:

  • Contrast ratio >= 4.5:1 for text against background
  • Tappable targets are at least 48x48 pixels
  • Color is not the sole indicator of state (use icons/text alongside)
  • Text scales with system font size settings

Interaction accessibility:

  • No no-op onPressed callbacks — every button does something or is disabled
  • Error fields suggest corrections
  • Context does not change unexpectedly while user is inputting data

8. Platform-Specific Concerns

iOS/Android differences:

  • Platform-adaptive widgets used where appropriate
  • Back navigation handled correctly (Android back button, iOS swipe-to-go-back)
  • Status bar and safe area handled via SafeArea widget
  • Platform-specific permissions declared in AndroidManifest.xml and Info.plist

Responsive design:

  • LayoutBuilder or MediaQuery used for responsive layouts
  • Breakpoints defined consistently (phone, tablet, desktop)
  • Text doesn't overflow on small screens — use Flexible, Expanded, FittedBox
  • Landscape orientation tested or explicitly locked
  • Web-specific: mouse/keyboard interactions supported, hover states present

9. Security

Secure storage:

  • Sensitive data (tokens, credentials) stored using platform-secure storage (Keychain on iOS, EncryptedSharedPreferences on Android)
  • Never store secrets in plaintext storage
  • Biometric authentication gating considered for sensitive operations

API key handling:

  • API keys NOT hardcoded in Dart source — use --dart-define, .env files excluded from VCS, or compile-time configuration
  • Secrets not committed to git — check .gitignore
  • Backend proxy used for truly secret keys (client should never hold server secrets)

Input validation:

  • All user input validated before sending to API
  • Form validation uses proper validation patterns
  • No raw SQL or string interpolation of user input
  • Deep link URLs validated and sanitized before navigation

Network security:

  • HTTPS enforced for all API calls
  • Certificate pinning considered for high-security apps
  • Authentication tokens refreshed and expired properly
  • No sensitive data logged or printed

10. Package/Dependency Review

Evaluating pub.dev packages:

  • Check pub points score (aim for 130+/160)
  • Check likes and popularity as community signals
  • Verify the publisher is verified on pub.dev
  • Check last publish date — stale packages (>1 year) are a risk
  • Review open issues and response time from maintainers
  • Check license compatibility with your project
  • Verify platform support covers your targets

Version constraints:

  • Use caret syntax (^1.2.3) for dependencies — allows compatible updates
  • Pin exact versions only when absolutely necessary
  • Run flutter pub outdated regularly to track stale dependencies
  • No dependency overrides in production pubspec.yaml — only for temporary fixes with a comment/issue link
  • Minimize transitive dependency count — each dependency is an attack surface

Monorepo-specific (melos/workspace):

  • Internal packages import only from public API — no package:other/src/internal.dart (breaks Dart package encapsulation)
  • Internal package dependencies use workspace resolution, not hardcoded path: ../../ relative strings
  • All sub-packages share or inherit root analysis_options.yaml

11. Navigation and Routing

General principles (apply to any routing solution):

  • One routing approach used consistently — no mixing imperative Navigator.push with a declarative router
  • Route arguments are typed — no Map<String, dynamic> or Object? casting
  • Route paths defined as constants, enums, or generated — no magic strings scattered in code
  • Auth guards/redirects centralized — not duplicated across individual screens
  • Deep links configured for both Android and iOS
  • Deep link URLs validated and sanitized before navigation
  • Navigation state is testable — route changes can be verified in tests
  • Back behavior is correct on all platforms

12. Error Handling

Framework error handling:

  • FlutterError.onError overridden to capture framework errors (build, layout, paint)
  • PlatformDispatcher.instance.onError set for async errors not caught by Flutter
  • ErrorWidget.builder customized for release mode (user-friendly instead of red screen)
  • Global error capture wrapper around runApp (e.g., runZonedGuarded, Sentry/Crashlytics wrapper)

Error reporting:

  • Error reporting service integrated (Firebase Crashlytics, Sentry, or equivalent)
  • Non-fatal errors reported with stack traces
  • State management error observer wired to error reporting (e.g., BlocObserver, ProviderObserver, or equivalent for your solution)
  • User-identifiable info (user ID) attached to error reports for debugging

Graceful degradation:

  • API errors result in user-friendly error UI, not crashes
  • Retry mechanisms for transient network failures
  • Offline state handled gracefully
  • Error states in state management carry error info for display
  • Raw exceptions (network, parsing) are mapped to user-friendly, localized messages before reaching the UI — never show raw exception strings to users

13. Internationalization (l10n)

Setup:

  • Localization solution configured (Flutter's built-in ARB/l10n, easy_localization, or equivalent)
  • Supported locales declared in app configuration

Content:

  • All user-visible strings use the localization system — no hardcoded strings in widgets
  • Template file includes descriptions/context for translators
  • ICU message syntax used for plurals, genders, selects
  • Placeholders defined with types
  • No missing keys across locales

Code review:

  • Localization accessor used consistently throughout the project
  • Date, time, number, and currency formatting is locale-aware
  • Text directionality (RTL) supported if targeting Arabic, Hebrew, etc.
  • No string concatenation for localized text — use parameterized messages

14. Dependency Injection

Principles (apply to any DI approach):

  • Classes depend on abstractions (interfaces), not concrete implementations at layer boundaries
  • Dependencies provided externally via constructor, DI framework, or provider graph — not created internally
  • Registration distinguishes lifetime: singleton vs factory vs lazy singleton
  • Environment-specific bindings (dev/staging/prod) use configuration, not runtime if checks
  • No circular dependencies in the DI graph
  • Service locator calls (if used) are not scattered throughout business logic

15. Static Analysis

Configuration:

  • analysis_options.yaml present with strict settings enabled
  • Strict analyzer settings: strict-casts: true, strict-inference: true, strict-raw-types: true
  • A comprehensive lint rule set is included (very_good_analysis, flutter_lints, or custom strict rules)
  • All sub-packages in monorepos inherit or share the root analysis options

Enforcement:

  • No unresolved analyzer warnings in committed code
  • Lint suppressions (// ignore:) are justified with comments explaining why
  • flutter analyze runs in CI and failures block merges

Key rules to verify regardless of lint package:

  • prefer_const_constructors — performance in widget trees
  • avoid_print — use proper logging
  • unawaited_futures — prevent fire-and-forget async bugs
  • prefer_final_locals — immutability at variable level
  • always_declare_return_types — explicit contracts
  • avoid_catches_without_on_clauses — specific error handling
  • always_use_package_imports — consistent import style

State Management Quick Reference

The table below maps universal principles to their implementation in popular solutions. Use this to adapt review rules to whichever solution the project uses.

PrincipleBLoC/CubitRiverpodProviderGetXMobXSignalsBuilt-in
State containerBloc/CubitNotifier/AsyncNotifierChangeNotifierGetxControllerStoresignal()StatefulWidget
UI consumerBlocBuilderConsumerWidgetConsumerObx/GetBuilderObserverWatchsetState
SelectorBlocSelector/buildWhenref.watch(p.select(...))SelectorN/Acomputedcomputed()N/A
Side effectsBlocListenerref.listenConsumer callbackever()/once()reactioneffect()callbacks
Disposalauto via BlocProvider.autoDisposeauto via ProvideronClose()ReactionDisposermanualdispose()
TestingblocTest()ProviderContainerChangeNotifier directlyGet.put in teststore directlysignal directlywidget test

Sources

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

accessibility

무료요약 있음AI 평가 100점

Web·iOS·Android 화면을 WCAG 2.2에 맞춰 설계하고 점검합니다. 화면 읽기와 키보드 조작, 레이블, 대비, 조작 대상 크기를 확인합니다.

  • 아이콘 버튼에 설명 추가
  • 키보드 조작과 모달 초점 점검
  • 대비와 조작 대상 크기 확인
affaan-m/ECC28.4만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

agent-architecture-audit

무료요약 있음AI 평가 80점

인공지능 에이전트의 문제를 지시, 기억, 도구 실행, 화면 표시 등 12개 계층에서 조사합니다. 코드와 로그를 근거로 원인을 정리하고 심각도에 따른 지적 사항과 수정안을 제시합니다.

  • 앱 안에서만 발생하는 문제 조사
  • 이전 대화가 섞이는 원인 확인
  • 도구 실행 누락과 허위 실행 보고 확인
affaan-m/ECC28.4만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

agent-eval

무료요약 있음AI 평가 80점

실제 개발 과제로 여러 코딩 에이전트를 비교합니다. 성공률, 확인 가능한 API 비용, 소요 시간과 반복 실행의 안정성을 측정해 도입 결정과 업데이트 후 평가에 활용합니다.

  • 실제 개발 과제로 에이전트를 비교합니다
  • 새 도구나 모델을 도입하기 전에 평가합니다
  • 에이전트 업데이트 후 성능을 확인합니다
affaan-m/ECC28.4만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

agent-harness-construction

무료요약 있음AI 평가 100점

AI 에이전트의 도구 구성, 입력과 출력 형식, 오류 복구 절차를 설계합니다. 문맥 정보량을 관리하고 완료율, 재시도 횟수, 성공한 작업당 비용으로 개선을 평가합니다.

  • 에이전트 도구와 입력 형식을 설계합니다
  • 도구 결과와 다음 행동을 명확히 합니다
  • 안전한 재시도와 중단 조건을 정합니다
affaan-m/ECC28.4만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

agent-introspection-debugging

무료요약 있음AI 평가 100점

오류와 실행 환경을 바탕으로 AI 에이전트가 실패하거나 같은 작업을 반복하는 원인을 조사합니다. 작은 복구 작업을 시험하고 결과와 근거를 인계용 보고서로 정리합니다.

  • 에이전트의 연속 실패 진단
  • 동일한 도구 작업의 반복 조사
  • 정보 누적으로 인한 출력 품질 저하 점검
affaan-m/ECC28.4만2026년 10월 5일 업데이트

agent-introspection-debugging

무료요약 있음AI 평가 100점

AI 에이전트의 반복 실패와 도구 사용을 기록하고 원인을 좁힙니다. 영향이 제한된 복구 작업과 결과 보고를 통해 근거 있는 재시도를 돕습니다.

  • 같은 도구 작업을 반복하는 원인 조사
  • 대화 증가에 따른 출력 품질 저하 조사
  • 파일 경로와 환경 불일치 확인
affaan-m/ECC28.4만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

affaan-m의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고