본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ito-inference

Clarify the availability and requirements of model serving on booked Itô GPUs. The supplied implementation does not support serving, so it reports that limitation and documents future booking verification, configuration review, and explicit confirmation requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Inspect the availability of model serving on a completed Itô compute booking and, when the canonical backend becomes available, hand off an explicitly confirmed serving manifest. Use after ito-compute has booked GPU nodes and the user asks for an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, ito-serve, hosted Kimi, or self-hosted open-weights inference. ECC implements no serving stack of its own.

연동 도구OpenAI
설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Checking documented serving availability after an Itô GPU booking
  • Clarifying limitations for an OpenAI-compatible endpoint
  • Reviewing future model-serving configuration requirements
  • Understanding confirmation and recovery requirements for serving

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Itô Inference

ito-inference is the sole canonical ECC skill for inference serving on Itô compute. Requests naming ito-serve route here; do not create or install a second ito-serve skill. ECC never SSHes to nodes, downloads weights, launches an engine, or exposes an endpoint; it never books, reserves, or spends.

Current production boundary

Managed serving is unavailable today. The ECC bridge exposes only login, auth, find, status, and explicitly gated evals. It has no serve verb. The canonical runtime documents inference only as an unsupported compatibility probe; ECC does not invoke or depend on it. The MCP surface exposes only auth, find, and status. The locally enforceable guarantee is that ECC rejects serve before resolving or spawning the credential-bearing canonical client.

Therefore stop before authentication or any command invocation. Report the missing capability and return to the originating agent. Never substitute a local runner, SSH helper, browser workflow, purchase endpoint, or any untracked local ito-serve draft.

Required entitlement

When serving is implemented, its first gate is a server-verified completed booking. Harness memory, an RFQ, a quote, node IPs, or SSH access are not proof of entitlement. The backend must return fresh serving eligibility bound to the authenticated account, booking, GPU topology, region, fabric, term, and model policy. Expired, revoked, mismatched, incomplete, or already-released bookings fail closed before confirmation.

Future CLI and API contract

The intended command name is serve; inference may remain only as an explicitly deprecated compatibility alias after the production contract lands. The future handoff must be equivalent to:

ecc ito serve \
  --booking <server-verified-booking-id> \
  --manifest <absolute-reviewed-json-file> \
  --confirmation-ref <opaque-non-authorizing-reference> \
  --idempotency-key <stable-retry-key> \
  --json

The reviewed manifest must identify the model revision, engine and version, quantization, tensor/pipeline topology, endpoint exposure policy, artifact checksums, storage ceiling, runtime limits, optional TTFT/TPOT objectives, and maximum incremental cost. No raw API key, SSH key, node password, or bearer token belongs in arguments, manifests, logs, MCP results, or chat.

The client must canonicalize the manifest path, reject symlinks, open a regular file without following links, require appropriate ownership and restrictive permissions, enforce a bounded size, and hash bytes from the opened descriptor. That digest must exactly equal the digest bound into confirmation before any workload mutation. A path swap, digest mismatch, oversized file, or mutable unsafe file fails closed.

The canonical API—not ECC—must own workload creation and return structured JSON with ok, live_api_contacted, notice, and either data or error. Serving data must include stable booking, workload, manifest, and idempotency IDs plus a state enum; it must not claim an endpoint is live until health and model checks pass. Errors must include a stable code and safe message without secrets.

Confirmation and execution gates

Before workload creation, require all of the following:

  1. Fresh entitlement and serving eligibility from the canonical backend.
  2. A reviewable immutable manifest and deterministic digest.
  3. A separate single-use confirmation bound to account, action, manifest, and cost, with a short expiry and replay protection. CLI arguments carry only an opaque, non-authorizing confirmation reference; the server resolves and consumes the bearer capability out of band.
  4. A caller-supplied idempotency key reserved atomically with the workload.
  5. Server-side fabric, capacity, model-policy, storage, and cost validation.

Authentication is identity, not workload authority. A login, API key, quote, or completed booking never substitutes for the serving confirmation. Inspection and plan generation must not create a workload. Cancel and cleanup are separate mutations with their own scoped confirmation and idempotency boundaries.

Lifecycle and recovery

The production surface is incomplete until the same canonical client exposes tenant-scoped status, logs, metrics, cancel, and cleanup operations. Every operation needs bounded connect and overall timeouts, revocation-aware errors, and structured output. After an ambiguous transport failure, query status by the idempotency key before retrying; never create a second workload merely because the first response was lost. A revoked credential stops polling and returns control to the originating agent without starting login automatically.

Only report ready after endpoint health, model identity, and canary inference all pass. Report intermediate and terminal failure states honestly. Cleanup must be observable and must not release or modify the underlying booking unless that separate economic action was explicitly authorized.

Proposed backend stages

These stages describe the future backend, not code that exists in ECC:

  1. Verify entitlement, topology, fabric, and cost gates.
  2. Fetch checksum-pinned weights into backend-managed storage.
  3. Emit and validate a reviewable topology/engine plan.
  4. Launch through the provider control plane, never direct root SSH from ECC.
  5. Warm up, test health and model identity, run an SLO canary, then register the endpoint and redacted configuration.

Until every gate and lifecycle operation above exists in the canonical runtime, this skill remains a fail-closed availability check and documentation handoff.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 5일 업데이트

affaan-m의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고