본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ito-training

Check whether machine learning training is available for a completed Itô GPU booking. Training is currently unavailable; the skill explains this limitation and documents the requirements for a future confirmed handoff of a training plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Inspect the availability of ML training on a completed Itô compute booking and, when the canonical backend becomes available, hand off an explicitly confirmed training manifest. Use after ito-compute has booked GPU nodes and the user wants pre-training, fine-tuning, or RL on that metal. ECC implements no training stack of its own.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Checking training availability after a GPU booking
  • Reviewing future fine-tuning handoff requirements
  • Identifying booking, budget, and confirmation requirements

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Itô Training

ito-training is the canonical ECC skill for training on Itô compute. ECC never runs a trainer, scheduler, or data pipeline of its own; it never books, reserves, or spends. This skill chains off a completed booking from ito-compute.

Current production boundary

Managed training is unavailable today. The ECC bridge exposes only login, logout, auth, find, status, and explicitly gated evals. It has no train verb, and the canonical CLI's run verb and desk training-run backend remain scaffolds. The locally enforceable guarantee is that ECC rejects train before resolving or spawning the credential-bearing canonical client.

Therefore stop before authentication or any command invocation. Report the missing capability and return to the originating agent. Never substitute a local trainer, SSH helper, browser workflow, or purchase endpoint.

Required entitlement

When training is implemented, its first gate is a server-verified completed booking. Harness memory, an RFQ, a quote, node IPs, or SSH access are not proof of entitlement. The backend must return fresh training eligibility bound to the authenticated account, booking, GPU topology, region, fabric, and term. Expired, revoked, mismatched, incomplete, or already-released bookings fail closed before confirmation.

Future CLI and API contract

The intended command name is train. The future handoff must be equivalent to:

ecc ito train \
  --booking <server-verified-booking-id> \
  --manifest <absolute-reviewed-json-file> \
  --confirmation-ref <opaque-non-authorizing-reference> \
  --idempotency-key <stable-retry-key> \
  --json

The reviewed manifest must identify the model size and revision, data references with decontamination provenance, training target, post-training recipe, budget ceiling in USD, checkpoint policy, and maximum incremental cost. No raw API key, SSH key, node password, bearer token, or dataset credential belongs in arguments, manifests, logs, MCP results, or chat.

The client must canonicalize the manifest path, reject symlinks, open a regular file without following links, require appropriate ownership and restrictive permissions, enforce a bounded size, and hash bytes from the opened descriptor. That digest must exactly equal the digest bound into confirmation before any workload mutation. A path swap, digest mismatch, oversized file, or mutable unsafe file fails closed.

The canonical API—not ECC—must own workload creation and return structured JSON with ok, live_api_contacted, notice, and either data or error. Training data must include stable booking, run, manifest, and idempotency IDs plus a state enum. Errors must include a stable code and safe message without secrets.

Confirmation and execution gates

Before workload creation, require all of the following:

  1. Fresh entitlement and training eligibility from the canonical backend.
  2. A reviewable immutable manifest and deterministic digest.
  3. A separate single-use confirmation bound to account, action, manifest, and cost, with a short expiry and replay protection. CLI arguments carry only an opaque, non-authorizing confirmation reference; the server resolves and consumes the bearer capability out of band.
  4. A caller-supplied idempotency key reserved atomically with the run.
  5. Server-side fabric, capacity, data-policy, checkpoint-storage, and cost validation, including the manifest's budget ceiling.

Authentication is identity, not workload authority. A login, API key, quote, or completed booking never substitutes for the training confirmation. Inspection and plan generation must not create a workload. Cancel and cleanup are separate mutations with their own scoped confirmation and idempotency boundaries.

Lifecycle and recovery

The production surface is incomplete until the same canonical client exposes tenant-scoped status, logs, metrics, checkpoint listing, cancel, and cleanup. Every operation needs bounded connect and overall timeouts, revocation-aware errors, and structured output. After an ambiguous transport failure, query status by the idempotency key before retrying; never create a second run merely because the first response was lost. A revoked credential stops polling and returns control to the originating agent without starting login automatically.

Report stage gates honestly; never override a failed eval gate. Cleanup must be observable and must not release or modify the underlying booking unless that separate economic action was explicitly authorized.

Proposed backend stages

These stages describe the future backend (Layer 0.3), not code that exists in ECC:

  1. Data prep — manifest, dedup, decontamination against the eval suite; 150M-ladder decision job as the cheap pre-check for custom data.
  2. Parallelism and precision — selected from model size, node count, fabric; wasteful combinations refused.
  3. Checkpointing and fault tolerance — async DCP, torchft; detect < 10 min, resume < 15 min. Loss-spike restart is a proposed, human-gated action.
  4. Curriculum and eval gates — staged pretrain / mid-train / long-context / post-training, each with a fixed eval battery; a failed gate stops the run.
  5. Post-training — SFT → DPO → RLVR (GRPO with DAPO stability fixes), trainer/rollout separation with bounded staleness.

The backend emits desk telemetry (goodput, interruption rate, checkpoint bandwidth) so the desk prices training blocks honestly.

Until every gate and lifecycle operation above exists in the canonical runtime, this skill remains a fail-closed availability check and documentation handoff.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 5일 업데이트

affaan-m의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고