본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개한국어 소개

skill-stocktake

Claude 스킬과 명령의 실용성, 내용 중복, 기술 정보의 노후화를 점검합니다. 변경분 점검과 전체 검토를 지원하며, 개선하거나 통합할 대상을 판단할 근거를 정리합니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when auditing Claude skills and commands for quality. Supports Quick Scan (changed skills only) and Full Stocktake modes with sequential subagent batch evaluation.

AI 평가90점/ 100설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • 설치한 모든 스킬을 점검할 때
  • 변경한 스킬만 확인할 때
  • 스킬 간 중복 내용을 찾을 때
  • 스킬 업데이트나 통합을 검토할 때

한국어 소개

할 수 있는 일

skill-stocktake는 Claude 스킬과 명령의 품질을 점검하고 유지, 개선, 업데이트, 폐기, 통합 여부와 이유를 정리합니다. 내용 중복, 절차의 실용성, 용도와의 일치 여부, 기술 정보의 최신성을 확인합니다. Quick Scan은 변경분만 다시 평가하고, Full Stocktake는 전체 항목을 작은 묶음으로 나누어 하위 에이전트가 평가합니다.

이럴 때 유용합니다

스킬이 늘어 역할 중복을 파악하기 어렵거나 오래된 절차를 정리할 때 적합합니다. 전역 스킬과 프로젝트 스킬의 구체적인 개선안과 통합 대상을 확인할 수 있습니다. 저장된 평가를 이용해 중단한 검토를 이어갈 수도 있습니다.

사용 예시

  • “/skill-stocktake로 지난 실행 이후 바뀐 스킬을 점검해 주세요.”
  • “프로젝트 루트에서 /skill-stocktake full을 실행해 전체를 검토해 주세요.”

주의 사항

포함된 스크립트에는 Bash, Node.js, jq가 필요합니다. 프로젝트 스킬을 포함하려면 해당 루트에서 실행합니다. 사용 횟수 측정에는 선택 사항인 관측 파일이 필요하며, 미측정을 사용 횟수 0으로 취급하지 않습니다. 보관 처리나 삭제에는 명시적인 확인이 필요합니다.

이 소개문은 공개된 SKILL.md를 바탕으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 작성했습니다. 정확한 사양은 아래 원문을 확인하세요.

객관 평가

AI가 SKILL.md의 내용만을 근거로 4가지 관점에서 판정했습니다. 스타 수나 인기도는 판정에 넣지 않았습니다.

지시의 명확성언제 쓰고 무엇을 하는지 알 수 있는가
A양호품질 점검 용도와 Quick Scan의 변경분 점검, Full Stocktake의 전체 점검 범위가 명시됩니다.
절차의 구체성절차·입출력·예시가 구체적으로 적혀 있는가
A양호검색, 변경 확인, 결과 저장 명령과 평가 JSON 항목, 재개 절차가 제시됩니다.
안전성전송·삭제·명령 실행 등을 명시하고 있는가
A양호검색 경로와 결과 캐시 위치를 명시하고, 전체 교체와 병합 저장의 사용 범위를 설명합니다.
도입의 용이성필요한 도구나 API 키가 적고 적혀 있는가
B일부 부족Bash, Node.js, jq가 필요하다고 명시하지만 해당 도구의 설치 절차는 없습니다.

총점은 각 항목을 A=25점, B=15점, C=5점으로 더한 값입니다. 2026년 10월 19일 기준으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 판정했습니다. 참고용이므로 설치 전에 원문도 확인해 주세요.

평가가 다르다고 생각되면 재검토를 요청하기

어느 항목이 왜 다르다고 생각하는지 적어 주세요. 로그인은 필요 없습니다. SKILL.md와 대조해 평가를 다시 만들고 이곳에 반영합니다.

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md12.1 KB
  • scripts/quick-diff.sh4.5 KB
  • scripts/save-results.sh2.7 KB
  • scripts/scan.sh7.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

skill-stocktake

Slash command (/skill-stocktake) that audits all Claude skills and commands using a quality checklist + AI holistic judgment. Supports two modes: Quick Scan for recently changed skills, and Full Stocktake for a complete review.

Scope

The command targets the following paths relative to the directory where it is invoked:

PathDescription
~/.claude/skills/Global skills (all projects)
{cwd}/.claude/skills/Project-level skills (if the directory exists)

At the start of Phase 1, the command explicitly lists which paths were found and scanned.

Directories named .trash are excluded from both scan modes: archived skills are not part of the live inventory. If an older results.json contains .trash entries, start a new Full Stocktake using the cache initialization below before resuming Quick Scan. An ordinary save merges entries and does not remove archived records.

Targeting a specific project

To include project-level skills, run from that project's root directory:

cd ~/path/to/my-project
/skill-stocktake

If the project has no .claude/skills/ directory, only global skills and commands are evaluated.

Modes

ModeTriggerDuration
Quick Scanresults.json exists (default)5–10 min
Full Stocktakeresults.json absent, or /skill-stocktake full20–30 min

The shell scripts require Bash, Node.js, and jq on PATH.

Results cache: ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json

Quick Scan Flow

Re-evaluate only skills that have changed since the last run (5–10 min).

  1. Read ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json
  2. Run: bash ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/quick-diff.sh \ ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json (Project dir is auto-detected from $PWD/.claude/skills; pass it explicitly only if needed)
  3. If output is []: report "No changes since last run." and stop
  4. Re-evaluate only those changed files using the same Phase 2 criteria
  5. Carry forward unchanged skills from previous results
  6. Output only the diff
  7. Run: bash ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/save-results.sh \ ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json <<< "$EVAL_RESULTS"

Full Stocktake Flow

Phase 1 — Inventory

Run this entire block in one Bash invocation. It prints the inventory for the agent and initializes a new full run only when there is no unfinished run to resume:

(
  set -euo pipefail
  SCAN_JSON=$(bash ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/scan.sh)
  printf '%s\n' "$SCAN_JSON"
  RESULTS_JSON=~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json

  CACHE_STATUS=""
  if [[ -f "$RESULTS_JSON" ]]; then
    CACHE_STATUS=$(jq -r '.batch_progress.status // ""' "$RESULTS_JSON")
  fi
  if [[ "$CACHE_STATUS" == "in_progress" ]]; then
    RESUMED_RESULTS=$(jq --slurpfile saved "$RESULTS_JSON" '
      . as $inventory | $saved[0]
      | .skills = (.skills | to_entries
        | map(.key = (.value.path // .key))
        | map(select(. as $entry
          | $entry.value.mtime != null
            and any($inventory.skills[];
              .path == $entry.key and .mtime == $entry.value.mtime)))
        | from_entries)
      | .mode = "full"
      | .batch_progress = {
          total: ($inventory.skills | length),
          evaluated: (.skills | length), status: "in_progress"
        }
    ' <<< "$SCAN_JSON")
    bash ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/save-results.sh \
      "$RESULTS_JSON" --replace <<< "$RESUMED_RESULTS"
  else
    INITIAL_RESULTS=$(printf '%s\n' "$SCAN_JSON" | jq '{
      mode: "full", skills: {},
      batch_progress: {total: (.skills | length), evaluated: 0, status: "in_progress"}
    }')
    bash ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/save-results.sh \
      "$RESULTS_JSON" --replace <<< "$INITIAL_RESULTS"
  fi
)

The script enumerates skill files, extracts frontmatter, and collects UTC mtimes. Project dir is auto-detected from $PWD/.claude/skills; pass it explicitly only if needed. Present the scan summary and inventory table from the script output:

Scanning:
  ✓ ~/.claude/skills/         (17 files)
  ✗ {cwd}/.claude/skills/    (not found — global skills only)
Skill7d use30d useDescription

Usage counts come from the optional ~/.claude/observations.jsonl file (overridable with SKILL_STOCKTAKE_OBSERVATIONS), which Claude Code does not create by default. When the file is absent, use_7d and use_30d are JSON null; display them as unmeasured in inventory and summary tables. A numeric 0 means the file exists but contains no matching Read observations in that window. Missing usage data is never evidence for retiring a skill.

--replace writes a complete cache snapshot. A new run starts with an empty evaluation; a resumed run instead keeps a saved evaluation only when its path is still live and its saved, non-null mtime matches the fresh inventory. Changed skills and entries without an mtime require re-evaluation. It removes archived/deleted entries and refreshes the progress counts even when no new batch remains. Existing name-keyed entries are normalized using their saved path. Never use the empty initialization payload for a resume. Later chunks, completion updates, and Quick Scans must omit --replace so they merge into the current run instead of losing earlier results.

Phase 2 — Quality Evaluation

Launch an Agent tool subagent (general-purpose agent) with the actual JSON emitted by Phase 1 and the checklist below. Copy the inventory values into the prompt itself; shell variables do not carry over into Agent calls. Include the full inventory for overlap checks and explicitly identify the paths in the current batch to evaluate. Do not send literal inventory or checklist placeholders.

The subagent reads each assigned skill, applies the checklist, and returns a JSON object with a skills map keyed by the inventory path. Each entry includes its path, scanned mtime, verdict, and self-contained reason. Use the same path keys across all batches so merging results cannot overwrite a different skill with the same name.

Chunk guidance: Process ~20 skills per subagent invocation to keep context manageable. After each chunk, wrap its returned skills map with mode: "full" and batch_progress: {total, evaluated, status: "in_progress"}. Set total to the inventory size and evaluated to the cumulative number of distinct evaluated paths, including saved batches. Assign this JSON to CHUNK_RESULTS and run the following command in the same Bash invocation as that assignment:

bash ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/save-results.sh \
  ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json <<< "$CHUNK_RESULTS"

After all skills are evaluated, persist completion before proceeding to Phase 3:

(
  set -euo pipefail
  RESULTS_JSON=~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json
  COMPLETED_RESULTS=$(jq -e '
    if (.skills | length) == .batch_progress.total then
      {skills: {}, mode: "full", batch_progress: (.batch_progress + {
        evaluated: (.skills | length), status: "completed"
      })}
    else error("Inventory still has unevaluated skills") end
  ' "$RESULTS_JSON")
  bash ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/save-results.sh \
    "$RESULTS_JSON" <<< "$COMPLETED_RESULTS"
)

Resume detection: If status: "in_progress" is found on startup, run Phase 1 to reconcile the saved results with the fresh inventory, then evaluate only paths absent from the reconciled skills map. If none remain, persist completion immediately. Completed evaluations are preserved only for surviving paths with matching, non-null mtimes; new or changed skills and entries without an mtime require evaluation.

Each skill is evaluated against this checklist:

- [ ] Content overlap with other skills checked
- [ ] Overlap with MEMORY.md / CLAUDE.md checked
- [ ] Freshness of technical references verified (use WebSearch if tool names / CLI flags / APIs are present)
- [ ] Usage frequency considered when measured; missing observations marked unmeasured, not treated as zero

Verdict criteria:

VerdictMeaning
KeepUseful and current
ImproveWorth keeping, but specific improvements needed
UpdateReferenced technology is outdated (verify with WebSearch)
RetireLow quality, stale, or cost-asymmetric
Merge into [X]Substantial overlap with another skill; name the merge target

Evaluation is holistic AI judgment — not a numeric rubric. Guiding dimensions:

  • Actionability: code examples, commands, or steps that let you act immediately
  • Scope fit: name, trigger, and content are aligned; not too broad or narrow
  • Uniqueness: value not replaceable by MEMORY.md / CLAUDE.md / another skill
  • Currency: technical references work in the current environment

Reason quality requirements — the reason field must be self-contained and decision-enabling:

  • Do NOT write "unchanged" alone — always restate the core evidence
  • For Retire: state (1) what specific defect was found, (2) what covers the same need instead
    • Bad: "Superseded"
    • Good: "disable-model-invocation: true already set; superseded by continuous-learning-v2 which covers all the same patterns plus confidence scoring. No unique content remains."
  • For Merge: name the target and describe what content to integrate
    • Bad: "Overlaps with X"
    • Good: "42-line thin content; Step 4 of chatlog-to-article already covers the same workflow. Integrate the 'article angle' tip as a note in that skill."
  • For Improve: describe the specific change needed (what section, what action, target size if relevant)
    • Bad: "Too long"
    • Good: "276 lines; Section 'Framework Comparison' (L80–140) duplicates ai-era-architecture-principles; delete it to reach ~150 lines."
  • For Keep (mtime-only change in Quick Scan): restate the original verdict rationale, do not write "unchanged"
    • Bad: "Unchanged"
    • Good: "mtime updated but content unchanged. Unique Python reference explicitly imported by rules/python/; no overlap found."

Phase 3 — Summary Table

Skill7d useVerdictReason

Phase 4 — Consolidation

  1. Retire / Merge: present detailed justification per file before confirming with user:
    • What specific problem was found (overlap, staleness, broken references, etc.)
    • What alternative covers the same functionality (for Retire: which existing skill/rule; for Merge: the target file and what content to integrate)
    • Impact of removal (any dependent skills, MEMORY.md references, or workflows affected)
  2. Improve: present specific improvement suggestions with rationale:
    • What to change and why (e.g., "trim 430→200 lines because sections X/Y duplicate python-patterns")
    • User decides whether to act
  3. Update: present updated content with sources checked
  4. Check MEMORY.md line count; propose compression if >100 lines

Results File Schema

~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json:

evaluated_at: Must be set to the actual UTC time of evaluation completion. Obtain via Bash: date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ. Never use a date-only approximation like T00:00:00Z.

{
  "evaluated_at": "2026-02-21T10:00:00Z",
  "mode": "full",
  "batch_progress": {
    "total": 80,
    "evaluated": 80,
    "status": "completed"
  },
  "skills": {
    "~/.claude/skills/skill-name/SKILL.md": {
      "path": "~/.claude/skills/skill-name/SKILL.md",
      "verdict": "Keep",
      "reason": "Concrete, actionable, unique value for X workflow",
      "mtime": "2026-01-15T08:30:00Z"
    }
  }
}

Notes

  • Evaluation is blind: the same checklist applies to all skills regardless of origin (ECC, self-authored, auto-extracted)
  • Archive / delete operations always require explicit user confirmation
  • No verdict branching by skill origin

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

agent-eval

무료요약 있음AI 평가 80점

실제 개발 과제로 여러 코딩 에이전트를 비교합니다. 성공률, 확인 가능한 API 비용, 소요 시간과 반복 실행의 안정성을 측정해 도입 결정과 업데이트 후 평가에 활용합니다.

  • 실제 개발 과제로 에이전트를 비교합니다
  • 새 도구나 모델을 도입하기 전에 평가합니다
  • 에이전트 업데이트 후 성능을 확인합니다
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 5일 업데이트

agent-introspection-debugging

무료요약 있음AI 평가 100점

AI 에이전트의 반복 실패와 도구 사용을 기록하고 원인을 좁힙니다. 영향이 제한된 복구 작업과 결과 보고를 통해 근거 있는 재시도를 돕습니다.

  • 같은 도구 작업을 반복하는 원인 조사
  • 대화 증가에 따른 출력 품질 저하 조사
  • 파일 경로와 환경 불일치 확인
affaan-m/ECC28.3만2026년 10월 16일 업데이트

affaan-m의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고