Universal guardrails loaded by every agent. Defines Verify Before Reporting (VBR), Write-Ahead Log (WAL), and the security baseline. Always-on, role-independent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Behavioral guardrails for implementation work. Reduces common LLM coding mistakes: overcomplication, silent assumption-picking, scope drift, and unverifiable success criteria. Load on Builder and software-engineer-mode.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Behavioral guardrails to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, adapted from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
Original source: karpathy-guidelines — MIT License — Andrej Karpathy.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
Ask: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
When your changes create orphans:
The test: every changed line should trace directly to the ticket's acceptance criteria.
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals before starting:
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let the agent loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification and stall delivery.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Universal guardrails loaded by every agent. Defines Verify Before Reporting (VBR), Write-Ahead Log (WAL), and the security baseline. Always-on, role-independent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when: Tester needs UI state evidence for VBR, or Builder needs to verify an integration wire is observable end-to-end. Powered by agent-browser MCP — token-efficient browser automation (200–400 tokens/page).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when drafting a bug or defect ticket, reviewing one someone else wrote, or deciding whether a reported problem is ready to file. Keeps what the reporter actually saw separate from what the agent later found out, so a reader can tell which lines are testimony and which are collected proof. Trigger phrases: 'file a bug', 'write up this defect', 'triage this report', 'is this ticket ready to file', 'what did the reporter actually see'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.