본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

karpathy-guidelines

Behavioral guardrails for implementation work. Reduces common LLM coding mistakes: overcomplication, silent assumption-picking, scope drift, and unverifiable success criteria. Load on Builder and software-engineer-mode.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Karpathy Guidelines

Behavioral guardrails to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, adapted from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.

Original source: karpathy-guidelines — MIT License — Andrej Karpathy.

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.


1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
  • If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask the team lead.

2. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what the ticket asks for.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.


3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it to the team lead — don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports, variables, or functions that your changes made unused.
  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless the ticket asks for it.

The test: every changed line should trace directly to the ticket's acceptance criteria.


4. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals before starting:

  • "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let the agent loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification and stall delivery.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Universal guardrails loaded by every agent. Defines Verify Before Reporting (VBR), Write-Ahead Log (WAL), and the security baseline. Always-on, role-independent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agistra/agistra.dev52026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agistra/agistra.dev52026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agistra/agistra.dev52026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Use when: Tester needs UI state evidence for VBR, or Builder needs to verify an integration wire is observable end-to-end. Powered by agent-browser MCP — token-efficient browser automation (200–400 tokens/page).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agistra/agistra.dev52026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Use when drafting a bug or defect ticket, reviewing one someone else wrote, or deciding whether a reported problem is ready to file. Keeps what the reporter actually saw separate from what the agent later found out, so a reader can tell which lines are testimony and which are collected proof. Trigger phrases: 'file a bug', 'write up this defect', 'triage this report', 'is this ticket ready to file', 'what did the reporter actually see'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agistra/agistra.dev52026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agistra/agistra.dev52026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Agistra의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고