본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

adr-compliance

Use when deeply validating an ADR's format, approval chain, linkage to standards, or deciding the correct ADR status

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • source.json635 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

ADR Compliance

When to use

Use this skill when:

  • creating a new ADR
  • reviewing a submitted ADR for approval
  • validating that a change requiring an ADR has one
  • checking that an ADR correctly references affected standards
  • generating an ADR draft on behalf of a human author

1. When an ADR is Required

An ADR MUST be created for:

  • AD-01: Architectural changes (new patterns, new boundaries, structural refactoring)
  • AD-02: Technology or framework additions (new dependency, new platform, new language)
  • AD-03: Breaking changes to APIs, events, or data contracts
  • AD-04: Security posture changes (auth method, encryption change, new exposure)
  • AD-05: Deviation from any active standard or policy
  • AD-06: Data migration or schema evolution affecting production data
  • AD-07: Performance-impacting changes (new caching strategy, query changes on hot paths)
  • AD-08: Governance or standards modifications

If uncertain whether an ADR is needed: create one. The cost is low; the cost of undocumented decisions is high.


2. ADR File Naming & Location

  • AD-09: ADRs MUST be stored under .specs/decisions/.
  • AD-10: File name MUST follow: ADR-XXXX-<kebab-case-title>.md
    • Example: ADR-0012-adopt-event-sourcing-for-audit-trail.md
  • AD-11: XXXX is a zero-padded sequential number.
  • AD-12: Numbers MUST NOT be reused, even if an ADR is deprecated or superseded.

3. Required Sections & Content

Every ADR MUST contain all of the following sections:

3.1 Header

# ADR-XXXX — [Short Title]
**Status:** Draft | Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXXX
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Authors:** [name(s)]
**Approved by:** [name(s)] (required before Accepted status)

3.2 Context

  • AD-13: Describe the situation, problem, or requirement that necessitates a decision.
  • AD-14: Reference the relevant standards, constraints, or business drivers.
  • AD-15: Context MUST be factual — not the decision itself.

3.3 Decision

  • AD-16: State the decision clearly and unambiguously.
  • AD-17: Use active voice: "We will adopt...", "The system will use...", "This service MUST...".
  • AD-18: The decision MUST be actionable — agents and engineers must be able to implement from it.

3.4 Alternatives Considered

  • AD-19: At least one alternative MUST be documented.
  • AD-20: Each alternative MUST include: description, pros, cons, and reason it was not chosen.
  • AD-21: "Do nothing" is always a valid alternative and MUST be evaluated.

3.5 Consequences

  • AD-22: List positive consequences (benefits, improvements).
  • AD-23: List negative consequences (trade-offs, risks, debt introduced).
  • AD-24: Mitigation plan for identified risks MUST be included.
  • AD-25: Impact on existing components, services, or standards MUST be described.

3.6 Affected Standards

  • AD-26: List every spec, standard, or policy this ADR modifies, deviates from, or supersedes.
  • AD-27: Include the specific section or rule ID that is affected.
  • AD-28: If this ADR introduces a new exception, state the exception scope and expiry date.

4. Status Lifecycle

Draft → Proposed → Accepted
                  ↘ Deprecated
                  ↘ Superseded by ADR-XXXX
  • AD-29: Draft — work in progress, not yet reviewable.
  • AD-30: Proposed — ready for review; must not be implemented until Accepted.
  • AD-31: Accepted — approved by authorized owner; implementation may proceed.
  • AD-32: Deprecated — decision is no longer in effect; superseding context must be explained.
  • AD-33: Superseded — replaced by a newer ADR; reference to successor MUST be included.
  • AD-34: Implementation MUST NOT begin until status is Accepted.

5. Approval Requirements

  • AD-35: ADRs affecting architecture require approval from: Platform Architecture Owner or Staff Engineer.
  • AD-36: ADRs affecting security posture require approval from: Security Owner.
  • AD-37: ADRs affecting governance or standards require approval from: Engineering Leadership.
  • AD-38: ADRs for local service deviations (no cross-team impact) require approval from: Tech Lead of the affected team.
  • AD-39: Self-approval is forbidden — the author MUST NOT be the sole approver.

6. ADR Immutability Rules

  • AD-40: Accepted ADRs MUST NOT be edited to change the decision retroactively.
  • AD-41: If a decision changes, a new ADR MUST be created with Supersedes: ADR-XXXX.
  • AD-42: Corrections to typos or formatting are allowed without creating a new ADR.
  • AD-43: Context updates that do not change the decision are allowed with a changelog note in the ADR.

7. ADR Draft Template

When generating an ADR draft, use this structure:

# ADR-XXXX — [Short Title]
**Status:** Draft
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Authors:** [name]
**Approved by:** —

---

## Context
[Describe the problem or situation requiring a decision.]

## Decision
[State clearly what has been decided.]

## Alternatives Considered

### Option A — [Name]
- **Description:** ...
- **Pros:** ...
- **Cons:** ...
- **Rejected because:** ...

### Option B — Do Nothing
- **Description:** Maintain current approach.
- **Pros:** No disruption.
- **Cons:** [Why this is insufficient.]
- **Rejected because:** ...

## Consequences

### Positive
- ...

### Negative / Trade-offs
- ...

### Risks & Mitigations
- **Risk:** ...  **Mitigation:** ...

## Affected Standards
- [Standard name] — [Section/rule affected]

Examples

✅ Good: ADR-0007 with all sections, alternatives, explicit risks, approved by Platform Architect. ✅ Good: ADR that supersedes ADR-0003 and clearly explains why the old decision is no longer valid.

❌ Bad: ADR with only Context and Decision sections — missing Alternatives and Consequences. ❌ Bad: ADR in Accepted status with no approver listed. ❌ Bad: Implementation proceeding while ADR is still in Draft status.

Quick Mode

For low-context activation, load .enterprise/governance/agent-skills/adr-compliance/SKILL-QUICK.md or QUICK.md first. Load this full skill for deep analysis, violation fixing, or formal review gates.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

007

무료

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aibot88/sec_skill_store52026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Guides the creation of agile user stories and Gherkin feature files. Use when the user wants to create a user story, write acceptance criteria, define Gherkin scenarios, or author BDD feature files. This should trigger for requests such as Create a user story; Write a user story; I need to write a user story. Part of cursor-rules-java project

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aibot88/sec_skill_store52026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aibot88/sec_skill_store52026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aibot88/sec_skill_store52026년 5월 27일 업데이트

10x-team

무료

You MUST use this when building projects end-to-end. Orchestrates all 12 team roles — automatically switches between CTO, architect, PM, engineers, SRE, security, DBA, QA, and EM based on the current phase of work. Starts with brainstorming before any implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aibot88/sec_skill_store52026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aibot88/sec_skill_store52026년 5월 27일 업데이트

aibot88의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고