본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

bmad-correct-course

Manage significant changes during sprint execution. Use when the user says "correct course" or "propose sprint change"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md13.2 KB
  • checklist.md11.4 KB
  • customize.toml1.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Correct Course - Sprint Change Management Workflow

Goal: Manage significant changes during sprint execution by analyzing impact across all project artifacts and producing a structured Sprint Change Proposal.

Your Role: You are a Developer navigating change management. Analyze the triggering issue, assess impact across PRD, epics, architecture, and UX artifacts, and produce an actionable Sprint Change Proposal with clear handoff.

Conventions

  • Bare paths (e.g. checklist.md) resolve from the skill root.
  • {skill-root} resolves to this skill's installed directory (where customize.toml lives).
  • {project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.
  • {skill-name} resolves to the skill directory's basename.

On Activation

Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block

Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow

If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:

  1. {skill-root}/customize.toml — defaults
  2. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml — team overrides
  3. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml — personal overrides

Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.

Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps

Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.

Step 3: Load Persistent Facts

Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.

Step 4: Load Config

Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and resolve:

  • project_name, user_name
  • communication_language, document_output_language
  • user_skill_level
  • implementation_artifacts
  • planning_artifacts
  • project_knowledge
  • date as system-generated current datetime
  • YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config {communication_language}
  • Language MUST be tailored to {user_skill_level}
  • Generate all documents in {document_output_language}
  • DOCUMENT OUTPUT: Updated epics, stories, or PRD sections. Clear, actionable changes. User skill level ({user_skill_level}) affects conversation style ONLY, not document updates.

Step 5: Greet the User

Greet {user_name}, speaking in {communication_language}.

Step 6: Execute Append Steps

Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.

Activation is complete. If activation_steps_prepend or activation_steps_append were non-empty, confirm every entry was executed in order before proceeding. Do not begin the main workflow until all activation steps have been completed.

Paths

  • default_output_file = {planning_artifacts}/sprint-change-proposal-{date}.md

Input Files

InputPathLoad Strategy
PRD{planning_artifacts}/*prd*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*prd*/*.md (sharded)FULL_LOAD
Epics{planning_artifacts}/*epic*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*epic*/*.md (sharded)FULL_LOAD
Architecture{planning_artifacts}/*architecture*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*architecture*/*.md (sharded)FULL_LOAD
UX Design{planning_artifacts}/*ux*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*ux*/*.md (sharded)FULL_LOAD
Spec{planning_artifacts}/*spec-*.md (whole)FULL_LOAD
Document Project{project_knowledge}/index.md (sharded)INDEX_GUIDED

Execution

Document Discovery - Loading Project Artifacts

Strategy: Course correction needs broad project context to assess change impact accurately. Load all available planning artifacts.

Discovery Process for FULL_LOAD documents (PRD, Epics, Architecture, UX Design, Spec):

  1. Search for whole document first - Look for files matching the whole-document pattern (e.g., *prd*.md, *epic*.md, *architecture*.md, *ux*.md, *spec-*.md)
  2. Check for sharded version - If whole document not found, look for a directory with index.md (e.g., prd/index.md, epics/index.md)
  3. If sharded version found:
    • Read index.md to understand the document structure
    • Read ALL section files listed in the index
    • Process the combined content as a single document
  4. Priority: If both whole and sharded versions exist, use the whole document

Discovery Process for INDEX_GUIDED documents (Document Project):

  1. Search for index file - Look for {project_knowledge}/index.md
  2. If found: Read the index to understand available documentation sections
  3. Selectively load sections based on relevance to the change being analyzed — do NOT load everything, only sections that relate to the impacted areas
  4. This document is optional — skip if {project_knowledge} does not exist (greenfield projects)

Fuzzy matching: Be flexible with document names — users may use variations like prd.md, bmm-prd.md, product-requirements.md, etc.

Missing documents: Not all documents may exist. PRD and Epics are essential; Architecture, UX Design, Spec, and Document Project are loaded if available. HALT if PRD or Epics cannot be found.

<workflow> <step n="1" goal="Initialize Change Navigation"> <action>Confirm change trigger and gather user description of the issue</action> <action>Ask: "What specific issue or change has been identified that requires navigation?"</action> <action>Verify access to project documents:</action> - PRD (Product Requirements Document) — required - Current Epics and Stories — required - Architecture documentation — optional, load if available - UI/UX specifications — optional, load if available <action>Ask user for mode preference:</action> - **Incremental** (recommended): Refine each edit collaboratively - **Batch**: Present all changes at once for review <action>Store mode selection for use throughout workflow</action>

<action if="change trigger is unclear">HALT: "Cannot navigate change without clear understanding of the triggering issue. Please provide specific details about what needs to change and why."</action>

<action if="PRD or Epics are unavailable">HALT: "Need access to PRD and Epics to assess change impact. Please ensure these documents are accessible. Architecture and UI/UX will be used if available."</action> </step>

<step n="2" goal="Execute Change Analysis Checklist"> <action>Read fully and follow the systematic analysis from: checklist.md</action> <action>Work through each checklist section interactively with the user</action> <action>Record status for each checklist item:</action> - [x] Done - Item completed successfully - [N/A] Skip - Item not applicable to this change - [!] Action-needed - Item requires attention or follow-up <action>Maintain running notes of findings and impacts discovered</action> <action>Present checklist progress after each major section</action>

<action if="checklist cannot be completed">Identify blocking issues and work with user to resolve before continuing</action> </step>

<step n="3" goal="Draft Specific Change Proposals"> <action>Based on checklist findings, create explicit edit proposals for each identified artifact</action>

<action>For Story changes:</action>

  • Show old → new text format

  • Include story ID and section being modified

  • Provide rationale for each change

  • Example format:

    Story: [STORY-123] User Authentication
    Section: Acceptance Criteria
    
    OLD:
    - User can log in with email/password
    
    NEW:
    - User can log in with email/password
    - User can enable 2FA via authenticator app
    
    Rationale: Security requirement identified during implementation
    

<action>For PRD modifications:</action>

  • Specify exact sections to update
  • Show current content and proposed changes
  • Explain impact on MVP scope and requirements

<action>For Architecture changes:</action>

  • Identify affected components, patterns, or technology choices
  • Describe diagram updates needed
  • Note any ripple effects on other components

<action>For UI/UX specification updates:</action>

  • Reference specific screens or components
  • Show wireframe or flow changes needed
  • Connect changes to user experience impact
<check if="mode is Incremental"> <action>Present each edit proposal individually</action> <ask>Review and refine this change? Options: Approve [a], Edit [e], Skip [s]</ask> <action>Iterate on each proposal based on user feedback</action> </check>

<action if="mode is Batch">Collect all edit proposals and present together at end of step</action>

</step> <step n="4" goal="Generate Sprint Change Proposal"> <action>Compile comprehensive Sprint Change Proposal document with following sections:</action>

<action>Section 1: Issue Summary</action>

  • Clear problem statement describing what triggered the change
  • Context about when/how the issue was discovered
  • Evidence or examples demonstrating the issue

<action>Section 2: Impact Analysis</action>

  • Epic Impact: Which epics are affected and how
  • Story Impact: Current and future stories requiring changes
  • Artifact Conflicts: PRD, Architecture, UI/UX documents needing updates
  • Technical Impact: Code, infrastructure, or deployment implications

<action>Section 3: Recommended Approach</action>

  • Present chosen path forward from checklist evaluation:
    • Direct Adjustment: Modify/add stories within existing plan
    • Potential Rollback: Revert completed work to simplify resolution
    • MVP Review: Reduce scope or modify goals
  • Provide clear rationale for recommendation
  • Include effort estimate, risk assessment, and timeline impact

<action>Section 4: Detailed Change Proposals</action>

  • Include all refined edit proposals from Step 3
  • Group by artifact type (Stories, PRD, Architecture, UI/UX)
  • Ensure each change includes before/after and justification

<action>Section 5: Implementation Handoff</action>

  • Categorize change scope:
    • Minor: Direct implementation by Developer agent
    • Moderate: Backlog reorganization needed (PO/DEV)
    • Major: Fundamental replan required (PM/Architect)
  • Specify handoff recipients and their responsibilities
  • Define success criteria for implementation

<action>Present complete Sprint Change Proposal to user</action> <action>Write Sprint Change Proposal document to {default_output_file}</action> <ask>Review complete proposal. Continue [c] or Edit [e]?</ask> </step>

<step n="5" goal="Finalize and Route for Implementation"> <action>Get explicit user approval for complete proposal</action> <ask>Do you approve this Sprint Change Proposal for implementation? (yes/no/revise)</ask> <check if="no or revise"> <action>Gather specific feedback on what needs adjustment</action> <action>Return to appropriate step to address concerns</action> <goto step="3">If changes needed to edit proposals</goto> <goto step="4">If changes needed to overall proposal structure</goto> </check> <check if="yes the proposal is approved by the user"> <action>Finalize Sprint Change Proposal document</action> <action>Determine change scope classification:</action>
  • Minor: Can be implemented directly by Developer agent
  • Moderate: Requires backlog reorganization and PO/DEV coordination
  • Major: Needs fundamental replan with PM/Architect involvement

<action>Provide appropriate handoff based on scope:</action>

</check> <check if="Minor scope"> <action>Route to: Developer agent for direct implementation</action> <action>Deliverables: Finalized edit proposals and implementation tasks</action> </check> <check if="Moderate scope"> <action>Route to: Product Owner / Developer agents</action> <action>Deliverables: Sprint Change Proposal + backlog reorganization plan</action> </check> <check if="Major scope"> <action>Route to: Product Manager / Solution Architect</action> <action>Deliverables: Complete Sprint Change Proposal + escalation notice</action>

<action>Confirm handoff completion and next steps with user</action> <action>Document handoff in workflow execution log</action> </check>

</step> <step n="6" goal="Workflow Completion"> <action>Summarize workflow execution:</action> - Issue addressed: {{change_trigger}} - Change scope: {{scope_classification}} - Artifacts modified: {{list_of_artifacts}} - Routed to: {{handoff_recipients}}

<action>Confirm all deliverables produced:</action>

  • Sprint Change Proposal document
  • Specific edit proposals with before/after
  • Implementation handoff plan

<action>Report workflow completion to user with personalized message: "Correct Course workflow complete, {user_name}!"</action> <action>Remind user of success criteria and next steps for Developer agent</action> <action>Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow.on_complete — if the resolved value is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.</action> </step>

</workflow>

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

代码仓库 AI 亲和度审计工具,支持前端、后端、全栈等各类项目。此技能用于检查给定的代码仓库对 AI Coding 工具的友好程度,生成详细的分析报告和改进建议。当用户需要评估代码仓库是否适合 AI 辅助开发、希望提升仓库的 AI 可操作性、或准备引入 AI Coding 工具前进行仓库评估时,应使用此技能。支持 TypeScript/JavaScript、Go、Java/Kotlin、Python、Rust 等主流技术栈。融合 OpenAI Harness Engineering 方法论,评估 Outer Loop(反馈闭环、评估门禁、机械化不变量)建设。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

alibaba/opc-starter882026년 7월 22일 업데이트

OPC-Starter 智能开发技能。AI 亲和的 React Boilerplate 项目开发规范,支持动态上下文感知、TDD 驱动开发、Agent Studio 扩展。适用于认证系统、组织架构、Agent 工具、数据同步等模块的迭代开发。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

alibaba/opc-starter882026년 7월 22일 업데이트

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

alibaba/opc-starter882026년 7월 22일 업데이트

Strategic business analyst and requirements expert. Use when the user asks to talk to Mary or requests the business analyst.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

alibaba/opc-starter882026년 7월 22일 업데이트

System architect and technical design leader. Use when the user asks to talk to Winston or requests the architect.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

alibaba/opc-starter882026년 7월 22일 업데이트

Builds, edits or analyzes Agent Skills through conversational discovery. Use when the user requests to "Create an Agent", "Analyze an Agent" or "Edit an Agent".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

alibaba/opc-starter882026년 7월 22일 업데이트

alibaba의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고