Structure board presentations and investor updates using financial, sales, product, and people perspectives. Turn supplied metrics into a coherent account of progress, explain missed targets, and make decisions and requests explicit, with placeholders for missing figures.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Build board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a "so what."
board deck, investor update, board meeting, board pack, investor relations, quarterly review, board presentation, fundraising deck, investor deck, board narrative, QBR, quarterly business review
Ask for a board deck in natural language, naming cadence and stage:
"Build a quarterly board deck — we're Series A." "Draft a fundraising board deck for a seed-stage company."
Provide available metrics. The builder fills gaps with explicit placeholders — never invents numbers.
Every section follows: Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask/Next
3 sentences. No more.
Bad: "We had a good quarter with lots of progress across all areas." Good: "We closed Q3 at $2.4M ARR (+22% QoQ), signed our largest enterprise contract, and enter Q4 with 14-month runway. The strategic shift to mid-market is working — ACV up 40% and sales cycle down 3 weeks. Q4 priority: close the $3M Series A and hit $2.8M ARR."
6-8 metrics max. Use a table.
| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARR | $2.4M | $1.97M | $2.3M | ✅ |
| MoM growth | 8.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | ✅ |
| Burn multiple | 1.8x | 2.1x | <2x | ✅ |
| NRR | 112% | 108% | >110% | ✅ |
| CAC payback | 11 months | 14 months | <12 months | ✅ |
| Headcount | 24 | 21 | 25 | 🟡 |
Pick metrics the board actually tracks. Swap out anything they've said they don't care about.
One sentence on each variance. Boards hate "revenue was below target" with no explanation. Say why.
The forecast must have a confidence level. "We expect $2.8M" is weak. "High confidence $2.6M, upside to $2.9M if two late-stage deals close" is useful.
No feature lists. Only features with evidence of user impact.
Keep this short unless there's a material issue. Boards don't need sprint details.
The "asks" slide is the most important. Be specific. "We'd like 3 warm introductions to CFOs at Series B companies" beats "any help would be appreciated."
Boards see 10+ decks per quarter. Yours needs a through-line.
The 4-Act Structure:
This works for good news AND bad news. It's credible because it acknowledges reality.
Opening frame: Start with the one thing that matters most — the board should know the key message by slide 3, not slide 30.
Never bury it. Boards find out eventually. Finding out late makes it worse.
Framework:
What NOT to do:
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Too many slides (>25) | Cut ruthlessly — if you can't explain it in the room, the slide is wrong |
| Metrics without targets | Every metric needs a target and a status |
| No narrative | Data without story forces boards to draw their own conclusions |
| Burying bad news | Lead with it, own it, fix it |
| Vague asks | Specific, actionable, person-assigned asks only |
| No variance explanation | Every gap from target needs one-sentence cause |
| Stale appendix | Appendix is only useful if it's current |
| Designing for the reader, not the room | Decks are presented — they must work spoken aloud |
Quarterly (standard): Full deck, all sections, 20-30 slides. Sent 48 hours in advance.
Monthly (for early-stage): Condensed — metrics dashboard, financials, pipeline, top risks. 8-12 slides.
Fundraising: Opens with market/vision, closes with ask. See references/deck-frameworks.md for Sequoia format.
references/deck-frameworks.md — SaaS board pack format, Sequoia structure, investor tailoringtemplates/board-deck-template.md — fill-in template for complete board decks아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.