본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

feature-flags-architect

Plan, review, and retire feature flags, switches that control feature availability. Includes tools to identify aging flags, generate phased release schedules, and check that documentation records ownership and emergency shutdown procedures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when adding, retiring, or auditing feature flags. Triggers on "add a flag", "ship behind a flag", "rollout plan", "kill switch", "stale flags", "flag debt", "LaunchDarkly", "GrowthBook", "Statsig", "Unleash", "Flipt", or any progressive-delivery question. Ships flag debt scanner, rollout planner, and kill-switch auditor (all stdlib Python), 4 references on flag taxonomy + provider trade-offs + rollout strategies + lifecycle, plus a /flag-cleanup slash command.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Plan a phased release for a new feature
  • Identify old flags for cleanup
  • Audit emergency shutdown documentation
  • Compare feature flag providers

포함된 파일(9)

  • SKILL.md9.6 KB
  • assets/flag_request_template.md1.7 KB
  • references/flag_lifecycle.md5.7 KB
  • references/flag_taxonomy.md4.4 KB
  • references/provider_comparison.md5.0 KB
  • references/rollout_strategies.md4.9 KB
  • scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py4.7 KB
  • scripts/kill_switch_audit.py4.9 KB
  • scripts/rollout_planner.py4.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Feature Flags Architect

End-to-end discipline for feature flags: classify them, ship them, ramp them, and retire them. Most teams treat flags as throwaway if-statements; this skill treats them as a controlled lifecycle with measurable debt.

When to use

  • Adding a new flag and need a rollout plan
  • Auditing a codebase for stale or orphaned flags
  • Choosing a flag provider (LaunchDarkly vs GrowthBook vs Statsig vs Unleash vs Flipt vs build-your-own)
  • Designing a kill-switch path for a risky launch
  • Cleaning up flag debt before a release freeze
  • Reviewing whether a feature should ship behind a flag at all

Core principle: flags are a lifecycle, not an if

request → design → ship → ramp → cleanup → archive

Flags that skip cleanup become debt: dead branches, stale defaults, untested code paths, unbounded blast radius. The three scripts in this skill enforce the lifecycle.

Quick start

# 1. Audit the repo for flag debt
python scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 90

# 2. Plan a progressive rollout for a new flag
python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 100000 --target-percent 100 --duration-days 14 --strategy ring

# 3. Verify every flag has a documented kill switch
python scripts/kill_switch_audit.py --repo . --flag-doc docs/feature-flags.md

The 4 flag types (taxonomy)

Different flag types have different lifespans and ownership. Misclassifying creates debt.

TypePurposeTypical lifespanOwnerCleanup trigger
ReleaseHide unfinished features in productiondays–weeksEng100% rollout reached
ExperimentA/B test variantsweeksProduct/MarketingTest concluded; winner picked
OperationalCircuit breakers, perf toggles, kill switchesmonths–yearsEng/SREReplaced by autoscaling/feature retirement
PermissionEntitlements per user/account/planyears (permanent)ProductPlan/role removed

Only Release and Experiment flags should be on a debt-scanner watchlist. Operational and Permission flags are by design long-lived. See references/flag_taxonomy.md for decision tree.

The 3 Python tools

All three are stdlib-only. Run with --help.

flag_debt_scanner.py

Finds flags older than --max-age-days with low usage, suggesting candidates for cleanup.

python scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 90 --format text
python scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 60 --format json > debt.json

Detection heuristic:

  1. Walk --repo for code references matching common flag-call patterns:
    • flag("..."), isFlagEnabled("..."), featureFlag("..."), getFlag("...")
    • client.variation("...", ...), unleash.isEnabled("..."), growthbook.feature("...")
  2. For each unique flag identifier, find the oldest commit that introduced it (git log --diff-filter=A -S <name>).
  3. Flag as DEBT if introduced > --max-age-days ago AND used in ≤--min-uses places.

Outputs flag name, age in days, file references, suggested action. JSON mode is CI-friendly.

rollout_planner.py

Generates a phased rollout schedule from population size, target percent, duration, and strategy.

python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 100000 --target-percent 100 --duration-days 14 --strategy ring
python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 50000 --target-percent 25 --duration-days 7 --strategy linear
python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 1000000 --target-percent 100 --duration-days 30 --strategy log

Strategies:

  • ring: 1% → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%, evenly spaced. Default for risky launches.
  • linear: constant rate per day. Default for medium-risk.
  • log: rapid early, slow tail. Default for low-risk launches with confidence.
  • cohort: by named cohort (internal → beta → free → paid → all).

Outputs a markdown table with date, percent, expected user count, abort criteria, and verification step per phase.

kill_switch_audit.py

Cross-references code-discovered flags against documentation to verify each has a kill switch path written down.

python scripts/kill_switch_audit.py --repo . --flag-doc docs/feature-flags.md
python scripts/kill_switch_audit.py --repo . --flag-doc runbooks/flags.md --format json

What it checks:

  1. Every code-discovered flag has an entry in --flag-doc
  2. Each entry declares: owner, type, kill-switch trigger, monitoring dashboard
  3. Reports flags missing documentation (FAIL) or missing fields (WARN)

Use as a pre-merge gate before any new flag ships.

Provider chooser (5 + DIY)

ProviderBest forPricing modelLock-in riskOSS option
LaunchDarklyEnterprise, complex targeting, audit/compliancePer-MAU, expensiveHighNo
GrowthBookMid-market, A/B testing focused, OSS-friendlyPer-MAU + OSSLowYes (self-host)
StatsigGrowth/product teams, advanced experimentationFree tier + per-MAUMediumNo
UnleashOSS-first, self-hosted, dev-friendlyOSS + EnterpriseLowYes
FliptLightweight, k8s-native, simple needsOSS-onlyNoneYes
DIY<100 flags, no targeting, full controlNoneNoneN/A

Decision rules:

  • <50 flags + no targeting → DIY with config file or env vars
  • Need analytics + experimentation → Statsig or GrowthBook
  • Compliance/SOC2 audit logs required → LaunchDarkly
  • Self-hosting required (data residency / air-gapped) → Unleash or Flipt
  • See references/provider_comparison.md for detail.

Workflows

Workflow 1: Ship a new feature behind a flag

1. Classify: which of the 4 flag types?
   → Release (most common for engineering work)
2. Run rollout_planner.py to design the ramp
3. Add flag entry to docs/feature-flags.md BEFORE writing code:
   - name, owner, type, kill-switch trigger, dashboard URL
4. Write the code with the flag
5. Run kill_switch_audit.py — must pass before merge
6. Deploy at 0%; verify kill switch works
7. Execute rollout schedule; abort if abort criteria met
8. At 100% for 7+ days: remove flag, delete dead branch, archive doc entry

Workflow 2: Quarterly flag cleanup

1. Run flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 90 > debt.md
2. For each flagged item:
   a. Confirm it reached 100% (or was killed)
   b. Find the issue/PR that introduced it; verify owner agrees to remove
   c. Delete dead branches; remove flag config
   d. Run kill_switch_audit.py — should now show one fewer flag
3. Update CHANGELOG: "Removed N stale flags"

Workflow 3: Choose a provider

1. Estimate flag count (current + 12-month projection)
2. Required features:
   - Targeting rules (user, account, geo, %)?
   - A/B testing + stats?
   - Audit log / SOC2?
   - Self-hosting / data residency?
3. Pricing budget (MAU * cost-per-MAU)
4. See provider_comparison.md decision tree
5. Build a 30-day proof-of-concept before signing

Workflow 4: Design a kill switch

1. Identify the failure modes:
   - Latency spike (which threshold?)
   - Error rate spike (which threshold?)
   - Business metric regression (which threshold?)
2. Wire each to an abort:
   - Manual: dashboard link + on-call playbook
   - Automated: alert threshold flips flag back to 0%
3. Test the kill switch in staging BEFORE production rollout
4. Document in flag-doc; pass kill_switch_audit.py

References

  • references/flag_taxonomy.md — 4 types, decision tree, ownership, lifespan
  • references/provider_comparison.md — LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Statsig / Unleash / Flipt / DIY trade-offs
  • references/rollout_strategies.md — ring / linear / log / cohort / geo, abort criteria, monitoring
  • references/flag_lifecycle.md — request → design → ship → ramp → cleanup → archive

Slash command

/flag-cleanup — Run the full cleanup workflow on the current repo: scan for debt, generate a removal plan, audit kill switches.

Asset templates

  • assets/flag_request_template.md — fill-in form for new flag requests (name, owner, type, kill switch, rollout plan)

Anti-patterns

  • Permanent flag with if (FLAG_FOO) 50 places — should be a Permission flag with a runtime config, not a Release flag
  • Flag with no owner — when the original engineer leaves, no one cleans it up
  • No kill switch documented — when the feature breaks, no one knows how to disable it
  • A/B test that ran 6 months — pick a winner; running indefinitely is debt
  • Flags as feature toggles for cosmetic changes — ship via deploy, not flag

Verifiable success

A team using this skill should achieve:

  • 100% of new flags pass kill_switch_audit.py at merge time
  • flag_debt_scanner.py --max-age-days 90 returns ≤5 stale flags repo-wide
  • Every flag has a documented owner, type, and kill switch
  • Mean time to retire a Release flag: <60 days from 100% rollout

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

aeo

무료

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

alirezarezvani의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고