본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

form-cro

Reviews contact, lead capture, and checkout forms to identify obstacles to completion. Produces justified field recommendations, clearer button and error text, mobile layout guidance, and hypotheses for testing alternative designs while preserving useful submission data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

When the user wants to optimize any form that is NOT signup/registration — including lead capture forms, contact forms, demo request forms, application forms, survey forms, or checkout forms. Also use when the user mentions "form optimization," "lead form conversions," "form friction," "form fields," "form completion rate," or "contact form." For signup/registration forms, see signup-flow-cro. For popups containing forms, see popup-cro.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Improving contact form completion
  • Reviewing required fields for demo requests
  • Reducing mobile form abandonment
  • Planning tests for form layouts and button text

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md9.2 KB
  • references/form-cro-playbook.md6.0 KB
  • scripts/form_field_analyzer.py9.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Form CRO

You are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Form Type

    • Lead capture (gated content, newsletter)
    • Contact form
    • Demo/sales request
    • Application form
    • Survey/feedback
    • Checkout form
    • Quote request
  2. Current State

    • How many fields?
    • What's the current completion rate?
    • Mobile vs. desktop split?
    • Where do users abandon?
  3. Business Context

    • What happens with form submissions?
    • Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
    • Are there compliance/legal requirements?

Core Principles

The thresholds that drive every form audit (full treatment in references/form-cro-playbook.md):

  • Field count: every added field costs conversions. Lead-gen forms: 3-5 fields is the working ceiling; 7+ required fields is a high-priority finding unless lead-qualification value is proven.
  • Required vs optional: each required field must justify itself with a downstream use. "Nice for sales" is not a justification — make it optional or cut it.
  • High-friction fields: phone number, company size, and address are the biggest abandonment drivers on top-of-funnel forms — demand justification or move them to step 2 / progressive profiling.
  • Error recovery: inline validation on blur (not on submit), specific error copy ("Enter a work email" not "Invalid input"), never clear filled fields on error.
  • CTA: value-specific button text ("Get my report") outperforms generic ("Submit").

Tools

ToolInvocationOutput
Field analyzerpython3 scripts/form_field_analyzer.py forms.json (no arg = embedded demo; --json for pipelines)Per-form field count, required-field ratio, high-friction field flags, CTA assessment

Run it on the form definition first; its flags become the seed list for the Form Audit below — each flag gets an Issue/Impact/Fix/Priority entry.

Output Format

Form Audit

For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: Estimated effect on conversions
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: High/Medium/Low

Recommended Form Design

  • Required fields: Justified list
  • Optional fields: With rationale
  • Field order: Recommended sequence
  • Copy: Labels, placeholders, button
  • Error messages: For each field
  • Layout: Visual guidance

Test Hypotheses

Ideas to A/B test with expected outcomes


Experiment Ideas

Form Structure Experiments

Layout & Flow

  • Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar
  • 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
  • Form embedded on page vs. separate page
  • Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment
  • Form above fold vs. after content

Field Optimization

  • Reduce to minimum viable fields
  • Add or remove phone number field
  • Add or remove company/organization field
  • Test required vs. optional field balance
  • Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data
  • Hide fields for returning/known visitors

Smart Forms

  • Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers
  • Progressive profiling (ask more over time)
  • Conditional fields based on earlier answers
  • Auto-suggest for company names

Copy & Design Experiments

Labels & Microcopy

  • Test field label clarity and length
  • Placeholder text optimization
  • Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover
  • Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)

CTAs & Buttons

  • Button text variations ("Submit" vs. "Get My Quote" vs. specific action)
  • Button color and size testing
  • Button placement relative to fields

Trust Elements

  • Add privacy assurance near form
  • Show trust badges next to submit
  • Add testimonial near form
  • Display expected response time

Form Type-Specific Experiments

Demo Request Forms

  • Test with/without phone number requirement
  • Add "preferred contact method" choice
  • Include "What's your biggest challenge?" question
  • Test calendar embed vs. form submission

Lead Capture Forms

  • Email-only vs. email + name
  • Test value proposition messaging above form
  • Gated vs. ungated content strategies
  • Post-submission enrichment questions

Contact Forms

  • Add department/topic routing dropdown
  • Test with/without message field requirement
  • Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)
  • Expected response time messaging

Mobile & UX Experiments

  • Larger touch targets for mobile
  • Test appropriate keyboard types by field
  • Sticky submit button on mobile
  • Auto-focus first field on page load
  • Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current form completion rate?
  2. Do you have field-level analytics?
  3. What happens with the data after submission?
  4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
  5. Are there compliance/legal requirements?
  6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?

Related Skills

  • signup-flow-cro — WHEN: the form being optimized is an account creation or trial registration form specifically. WHEN NOT: don't use signup-flow-cro for lead capture, contact, or demo request forms; form-cro is the right tool.
  • popup-cro — WHEN: the form lives inside a modal, exit-intent popup, or slide-in widget rather than embedded on a page. WHEN NOT: don't use popup-cro for standalone page-embedded forms.
  • page-cro — WHEN: the page containing the form is itself underperforming — poor value prop, weak headline, or mismatched traffic source. Fix the page context before or alongside the form. WHEN NOT: don't invoke page-cro if the form is the only conversion element on a dedicated landing page and the page itself is fine.
  • ab-test-setup — WHEN: specific form hypotheses are ready to test (field count, button copy, multi-step vs. single-step). WHEN NOT: don't use ab-test-setup before the audit identifies the most impactful change to test.
  • analytics-tracking — WHEN: field-level drop-off data doesn't exist yet and the team needs to instrument form analytics before any optimization can happen. WHEN NOT: skip if analytics are already in place.
  • marketing-context — WHEN: check .claude/product-marketing-context.md for ICP and qualification criteria, which directly informs which fields are truly necessary. WHEN NOT: skip if user has explicitly listed the fields and their business rationale.

Communication

All form CRO output follows this quality standard:

  • Every field recommendation is justified — never just "remove fields" without explaining which and why
  • Audit output uses the Issue / Impact / Fix / Priority structure consistently
  • Multi-step vs. single-step recommendation always includes the qualifying criteria for the choice
  • Mobile optimization is addressed separately from desktop — never conflate the two
  • Submit button copy alternatives are always provided (minimum 3 options with reasoning)
  • Error message rewrites are included when error handling is flagged as an issue

Proactive Triggers

Automatically surface form-cro when:

  1. "Our lead form isn't converting" — Any complaint about form completion rates immediately triggers the field audit and core principles review.
  2. Demo request or contact page being built — When frontend-design or copywriting skills are active and a form is part of the page, proactively offer form-cro review.
  3. "We're getting leads but bad quality" — Poor lead quality often signals wrong fields or missing qualification questions; proactively recommend field audit.
  4. Mobile conversion gap detected — If page-cro or analytics review shows a desktop vs. mobile completion gap on a form, surface form-cro mobile optimization checklist.
  5. Long form identified — When user describes or shares a form with 7+ fields, immediately flag the field-cost framework and multi-step recommendation.

Output Artifacts

ArtifactFormatDescription
Form AuditIssue/Impact/Fix/Priority tablePer-field and per-pattern analysis with actionable fixes
Recommended Field SetJustified listRequired vs. optional fields with rationale for each
Field Order & Layout SpecAnnotated outlineRecommended sequence, grouping, column layout, and mobile considerations
Submit Button Copy Options3-option tableAction-oriented button copy variants with reasoning
A/B Test HypothesesTableHypothesis × variant × success metric × priority for top 3-5 test ideas

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

aeo

무료

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

alirezarezvani의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고