본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

gdpr-audit-prep

Prepare for a GDPR audit with six structured questions covering processing records, lawful grounds, privacy risks, individual rights requests, international transfers, and breaches. Organize findings with article references and identify the next three actions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

/cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope> — GDPR audit 6-question Article-cited forcing interrogation. Use before annual internal GDPR review, post-breach internal audit, DPA investigation readiness, or acquisition due diligence.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Preparing for an annual internal GDPR audit
  • Reviewing privacy controls after a data breach
  • Preparing for a data protection authority investigation
  • Assessing a target company's privacy practices before acquisition

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

/cs:gdpr-audit-prep — GDPR DPO Forcing Questions

Command: /cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope>

The GDPR DPO auditor pressure-tests any privacy compliance work. Six Article-cited questions before any internal audit, breach response, DPA investigation, or acquisition due diligence.

When to Run

  • Before annual internal GDPR audit
  • Before quarterly Article 30 RoPA refresh
  • Before launching new high-risk processing (Article 35 DPIA required)
  • Post-breach (Articles 33-34)
  • Before DPA investigation response or supervisory authority engagement
  • During acquisition due diligence (target company privacy posture)
  • Quarterly during high-volume new-feature shipping

The Six DPO Questions

1. Show me the Article 30 RoPA — with last-updated date.

Most-cited finding area.

  • Must include all Article 30(1)(a)-(g) elements for controllers
  • Must include all Article 30(2)(a)-(d) elements for processors
  • Updated within reasonable time of changes (90 days expected)
  • Joint controller arrangements documented per Article 26

2. For this processing activity, what's the lawful basis under Article 6?

Article 6 is exclusive — pick ONE basis per purpose.

  • Six options: consent / contract / legal obligation / vital interests / public task / legitimate interests
  • Where "legitimate interests": LIA documented
  • Where "consent": records per Article 7; withdrawal mechanism
  • Special categories (Article 9) require an Article 9(2) exception

3. For high-risk processing, where's the DPIA per Article 35?

Required for high-risk; sample 3-5 activities.

  • Article 35(7)(a)-(d) required elements:
    • Systematic description of processing
    • Necessity + proportionality assessment
    • Risks to rights + freedoms
    • Measures to address risks
  • DPO consulted per Article 35(2)
  • Article 36 prior consultation triggered for residual high risk
  • For AI systems: integrates with EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA (cross-check with cs-ai-act-compliance)

4. Show me a DSAR from the last 30 days — and the response timing.

Articles 15-22 operational workflow.

  • Response within 1 month (Article 12(3)); extension up to 2 months for complex requests
  • Identity verification process documented
  • Right of access response includes all Article 15 information
  • Right to erasure (Article 17) workflow covers backups + processors

5. Show me Transfer Impact Assessments for the largest non-EU transfers.

Schrems II discipline.

  • Adequacy decision OR SCCs (Article 46) OR derogation (Article 49)
  • TIA per EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 + 02/2020
  • Supplementary measures where TIA flagged risk
  • US transfers covered by EU-US Data Privacy Framework adequacy (Jul 2023) — verify list of certified entities

6. Show me the breach log per Article 33(5) — all breaches, not just notifiable ones.

Article 33(5) requires logging ALL breaches.

  • Internal breach detection mechanism documented
  • Article 33 DPA notification within 72 hours (where required)
  • Article 34 data subject notification (where high risk)
  • Root cause + corrective action via CAPA system
  • Cross-check with cs-ciso-iso27001 for A.5.24-27 incident management alignment

Workflow

# 1. Compliance posture
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/gdpr_compliance_checker.py compliance_state.json

# 2. DPIA for high-risk activities
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/dpia_generator.py processing_activity.json

# 3. DSAR workflow validation
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/data_subject_rights_tracker.py dsar_log.json

# 4. Cross-framework reuse with ISO 27001 + SOC 2 + ISO 42001
python ../../skills/compliance-os/scripts/cross_framework_mapper.py program.json

Output Format

# GDPR Audit Prep: <scope>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Article Citations:** Every finding cites Article + paragraph; no paraphrase.

## The Decision Being Made
[RoPA-refresh | DPIA-required | DSAR-workflow | transfer-risk | breach-followup | DPA-readiness]

## Article 30 RoPA Status
- Last refresh: YYYY-MM-DD
- Required elements present: yes/no per processing activity
- Joint controller arrangements: documented/missing

## Article 6 Lawful Basis Discipline
- Activities reviewed: N
- Legitimate-interests claims without LIA: <list>
- Article 9 special categories with documented exception: yes/no

## Article 35 DPIA Quality
- High-risk activities requiring DPIA: <list>
- DPIAs complete per Article 35(7): pass/fail per activity
- Article 36 prior consultation triggered: <list>

## Data Subject Rights (Articles 12-22)
- DSARs in last 90 days: N
- Average response time: X days (target: ≤ 30)
- Right to erasure backup-processor flow: complete/incomplete

## Article 28 Processor Management
- Processors reviewed: N
- Contracts with all Article 28(3)(a)-(j) clauses: % complete
- Sub-processor flow-down notification mechanism: yes/no

## Schrems II Transfer Status
- Non-EU transfers: <list>
- Mechanism per transfer: adequacy / SCCs / derogation
- TIA on file: yes/no per transfer
- Supplementary measures where needed: <list>

## Article 33-34 Breach Discipline
- Breach log last 12 months: N
- Article 33 notification timing: ≤ 72h ratio
- Article 34 data subject notification (where high risk): on-time ratio

## Cross-Framework Impact
- ISO 27001 Article 32 alignment: clean / gaps
- EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA integration: applicable / not
- SOC 2 Privacy TSC alignment (if scope): clean / gaps

## Verdict
🟢 DPA-READY | 🟡 GAPS-IDENTIFIED | 🔴 NOT-READY

## Top 3 Actions
[3 concrete next steps with owner + Article-cited timeline]

## Outside Counsel Required
[Article-level ambiguities flagged: Schrems II supplementary measure adequacy, EU AI Act ↔ GDPR interaction, sectoral derogation interpretation, novel DPA enforcement]

Routing

  • /cs:compliance-readiness — for multi-framework view
  • /cs:iso27001-audit-prep — for Article 32 organizational measures
  • /cs:ai-act-readiness — for EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA integration
  • /cs:soc2-audit-prep — for SOC 2 Privacy TSC overlap
  • /cs:gc-review — for novel-case legal review

Related


Version: 1.0.0

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

aeo

무료

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8만2026년 8월 30일 업데이트

alirezarezvani의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고