본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

office-hours

Clarify a founder's business question through six written answers covering the problem, customer, distribution, competitive protection, capital, and founder fit. Turn the answers into a one-page brief with an assessment of readiness for further strategy discussion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

/c-level-agents:office-hours [topic] — YC-style 6-question founder interrogation before any advice. Forces clarity on problem, customer, distribution, defensibility, capital, and founder fit. Use when a founder question is too vague to route — e.g. 'should we grow faster?' — or before drafting a strategy brief.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Clarify assumptions before starting a major initiative
  • Organize business questions before fundraising
  • Examine the rationale for a strategic pivot
  • Turn a vague growth question into a concrete brief

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

/c-level-agents:office-hours — Six-Question Founder Interrogation

Command: /c-level-agents:office-hours <topic>

Before any advice, the founder must answer six questions. Modeled on YC office hours: no analysis until the founder has done the thinking. This is the cognitive forcing function that prevents drift into solutionism.

When to Run

  • Before starting any major initiative
  • Before fundraising
  • Before a strategic pivot
  • When the founder is excited (excitement is a tell — pressure-test)
  • When the answer is "obvious" (the obvious answer is usually wrong)

The Six Questions

The founder must answer all six in writing before any C-role weighs in.

1. Problem

Whose problem is this, and how do they describe it in their own words?

  • Not your framing. Their words.
  • If you can't quote a customer, you don't have a problem worth solving.

2. Customer

Who is the ICP? Name one real person who would buy this today.

  • Real human. Real company. Real seat.
  • If you can't name one, the ICP isn't ready.

3. Distribution

How does the customer first hear your name?

  • Channel, intent, search query, friend, conference — name it.
  • If the answer is "we'll figure out marketing later," the answer is no.

4. Defensibility

If this works, what stops a competitor from copying it in 6 months?

  • Network effects, switching costs, data moat, regulatory moat, brand — pick one.
  • "We'll execute better" is not a defense.

5. Capital

What does this cost, when does it pay back, and what's the alternative use of the money?

  • Total spend, payback months, opportunity cost.
  • If you don't know, don't approve it.

6. Founder Fit

Why are you the right person to do this — and why does this matter enough to spend the next 3 years on it?

  • Founder-market fit is the strongest predictor of survival.
  • If the answer is mercenary, the company will be too.

Output Format

After the founder answers all six, this command produces a one-page brief:

# Office Hours Brief: <topic>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Founder:** <name>

## 1. Problem
> [founder's verbatim answer]

## 2. Customer
> [founder's verbatim answer]

## 3. Distribution
> [founder's verbatim answer]

## 4. Defensibility
> [founder's verbatim answer]

## 5. Capital
> [founder's verbatim answer]

## 6. Founder Fit
> [founder's verbatim answer]

---

**Assessment** (one of):
- 🟢 GREEN — ship the brief to /c-level-agents:boardroom
- 🟡 YELLOW — sharpen Q[N] before proceeding
- 🔴 RED — kill or redefine; do not proceed

Routing

After the brief is GREEN, route to:

  • Single-role question → corresponding /cs-{role}-review
  • Multi-role question → /c-level-agents:brief then /c-level-agents:boardroom

Why This Works

Most bad decisions don't fail at execution — they fail at framing. Forcing six concrete answers surfaces the framing weaknesses before anyone burns time on analysis. The founder either fills the gaps or recognizes the question wasn't ready.

This is the YC office hours pattern adapted for Claude Code: the interrogation is the value.

Related Commands

  • /c-level-agents:brief — turn the answers into a one-page strategy brief
  • /c-level-agents:boardroom — multi-role deliberation
  • /c-level-agents:founder-mode — let the system pick the next step

Related Agents

  • All cs-* advisors consume the brief output
  • cs-chief-of-staff triggers /c-level-agents:office-hours when intake is unclear

Version: 1.0.0

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

aeo

무료

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

alirezarezvani의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고