Compares frameworks, libraries, and cloud providers using weighted criteria. Helps teams choose technologies with estimates of five-year total ownership costs, security assessments, community health indicators, and migration effort, risks, and timelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Technology stack evaluation and comparison with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, evaluating technology stacks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Evaluate and compare technologies, frameworks, and cloud providers with data-driven analysis and actionable recommendations.
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Technology Comparison | Compare frameworks and libraries with weighted scoring |
| TCO Analysis | Calculate 5-year total cost including hidden costs |
| Ecosystem Health | Assess GitHub metrics, npm adoption, community strength |
| Security Assessment | Evaluate vulnerabilities and compliance readiness |
| Migration Analysis | Estimate effort, risks, and timeline for migrations |
| Cloud Comparison | Compare AWS, Azure, GCP for specific workloads |
Compare React vs Vue for a SaaS dashboard.
Priorities: developer productivity (40%), ecosystem (30%), performance (30%).
Calculate 5-year TCO for Next.js on Vercel.
Team: 8 developers. Hosting: $2500/month. Growth: 40%/year.
Evaluate migrating from Angular.js to React.
Codebase: 50,000 lines, 200 components. Team: 6 developers.
The evaluator accepts three input formats:
Text - Natural language queries
Compare PostgreSQL vs MongoDB for our e-commerce platform.
YAML - Structured input for automation
comparison:
technologies: ["React", "Vue"]
use_case: "SaaS dashboard"
weights:
ecosystem: 30
performance: 25
developer_experience: 45
JSON - Programmatic integration
{
"technologies": ["React", "Vue"],
"use_case": "SaaS dashboard"
}
Compare technologies with customizable weighted criteria.
python scripts/stack_comparator.py --help
Calculate total cost of ownership over multi-year projections.
python scripts/tco_calculator.py --input assets/sample_input_tco.json
Analyze ecosystem health from GitHub, npm, and community metrics.
python scripts/ecosystem_analyzer.py --technology react
Evaluate security posture and compliance readiness.
python scripts/security_assessor.py --technology express --compliance soc2,gdpr
Estimate migration complexity, effort, and risks.
python scripts/migration_analyzer.py --from angular-1.x --to react
| Document | Content |
|---|---|
references/metrics.md | Detailed scoring algorithms and calculation formulas |
references/examples.md | Input/output examples for all analysis types |
references/workflows.md | Step-by-step evaluation workflows |
| Level | Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| High | 80-100% | Clear winner, strong data |
| Medium | 50-79% | Trade-offs present, moderate uncertainty |
| Low | < 50% | Close call, limited data |
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.