본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

vpe-review

Review engineering delivery plans, hiring proposals, and team changes through six operational questions. Assess delivery metrics, recruitment stages, management structure, and production practices, then produce a verdict and three concrete actions to address the findings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

/c-level-agents:vpe-review [plan] — Throughput-first VP of Engineering interrogation of any plan that touches delivery, eng hiring, team structure, or production discipline. Use when cycle time balloons, DORA metrics slide, or before committing to an eng hiring wave or a reorg.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Reviewing quarterly delivery commitments
  • Checking an engineering hiring plan
  • Assessing a proposed team reorganization
  • Investigating delivery delays and production incidents

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

/c-level-agents:vpe-review — VPE Forcing Questions

Command: /c-level-agents:vpe-review <plan>

The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change.

When to Run

  • Before quarterly delivery commitment (sprint planning, OKR review)
  • Before approving an eng hiring plan
  • Before restructuring eng teams (splitting/merging squads, adding tribes)
  • Before deciding whether to hire a VPE separately from CTO (or merge them)
  • When production incidents are increasing
  • When sprint velocity is dropping but everyone says "we're working hard"

The Six VPE Questions

1. What's the cycle time, and where does work wait?

No DORA, no diagnosis.

  • Lead Time for Changes is the single best health metric
  • If you can't decompose cycle time into stages, you can't fix the bottleneck
  • Run delivery_throughput_analyzer.py

2. What's the DORA performance level on all 4 metrics?

One Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy.

  • Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, MTTR, Change Failure Rate
  • The worst metric defines overall level
  • Fix lead time first; everything else follows

3. Where is the hiring funnel leaking?

"Can't find good engineers" is wrong.

  • Specific stage is over-filtering OR top-of-funnel volume is too low OR offer-to-accept is broken
  • Run eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py
  • If offer-to-accept < 70%, comp is below market or close discipline is weak

4. Is the team structure healthy for the headcount?

5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director.

  • Run eng_team_structure_designer.py
  • Manager-trigger fires when 5+ ICs have no dedicated EM
  • Director-trigger fires when 3+ EMs report directly to VPE/CTO

5. What's the production discipline maturity?

Level 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage.

  • On-call rotation ≥ 6 people
  • Severity-defined incident response with blameless postmortems
  • SLOs on customer-facing services (pair with engineering/slo-architect/)
  • Continuous deployment OR scheduled — not "usually one, sometimes the other"

6. Are we adding a VPE separately, or is CTO doing both?

If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed.

  • Or: VPE complement when CTO is co-founder more comfortable with strategy
  • VPE owns operating model; CTO owns architecture
  • At small scale (< 20 eng), one person can do both

Workflow

# 1. Delivery throughput
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json

# 2. Hiring funnel
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json

# 3. Team structure
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.json

Output Format

# VPE Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## The Decision Being Made
[throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO]

## Delivery Throughput (if applicable)
- DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low
- Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR>
- Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time)
- Top fix: <action + owner>

## Hiring Funnel (if applicable)
- End-to-end conversion: X%
- Weakest stage: <stage>
- Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed
- Top fix: <specific action>

## Team Structure (if applicable)
- Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes>
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no
- Director trigger fired: yes/no
- Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad>

## Production Discipline (if applicable)
- Current maturity level: 1-5
- Next practice to add: <specific>
- SLO coverage: X / Y services

## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK

## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]

Routing

  • /c-level-agents:cto-review — for architectural causes of throughput problems
  • cs-chro-advisor agent — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues
  • /c-level-agents:cfo-review — for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget
  • /c-level-agents:ciso-review — for production discipline + compliance overlap
  • /c-level-agents:decide — log the verdict
  • /c-level-agents:freeze 30 — on multi-year hiring commitments

Related

  • Agent: cs-vpe-advisor
  • Skill: vpe-advisor
  • Adjacent: ../../../engineering/slo-architect/, ../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/, ../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/

Version: 1.0.0

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

aeo

무료

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.9만2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

alirezarezvani의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고