Extract DPAPI-protected secrets such as credentials and browser data offline and online.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detect and prevent privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods by monitoring security contexts, capabilities, and syscall patterns with Falco and OPA policies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Privilege escalation in Kubernetes occurs when a pod or container gains elevated permissions beyond its intended scope. This includes running as root, using privileged mode, mounting host filesystems, enabling dangerous Linux capabilities, or exploiting kernel vulnerabilities. Detection combines admission control (prevention), runtime monitoring (detection), and audit logging (investigation).
| Vector | Risk | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|
| privileged: true | Full host access | Admission control + audit |
| hostPID: true | Access host processes | Admission control |
| hostNetwork: true | Access host network stack | Admission control |
| hostPath volumes | Read/write host filesystem | Admission control |
| SYS_ADMIN capability | Near-privileged access | Admission + runtime |
| allowPrivilegeEscalation: true | setuid/setgid exploitation | Admission control |
| runAsUser: 0 | Container root | Admission control |
| automountServiceAccountToken | Token theft for API access | Admission control |
| Writable /proc or /sys | Kernel parameter manipulation | Runtime monitoring |
# Enforce restricted policy on namespace
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: production
labels:
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
# Block dangerous capabilities
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8sdangerouspriv
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sDangerousPriv
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8sdangerouspriv
dangerous_caps := {"SYS_ADMIN", "SYS_PTRACE", "SYS_MODULE", "DAC_OVERRIDE", "NET_ADMIN", "NET_RAW"}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
cap := container.securityContext.capabilities.add[_]
dangerous_caps[cap]
msg := sprintf("Container %v adds dangerous capability: %v", [container.name, cap])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Container %v runs in privileged mode", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation == true
msg := sprintf("Container %v allows privilege escalation", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
input.review.object.spec.hostPID == true
msg := "Pod uses host PID namespace"
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
input.review.object.spec.hostNetwork == true
msg := "Pod uses host network"
}
# /etc/falco/rules.d/privesc-detection.yaml
- rule: Setuid Binary Execution in Container
desc: Detect execution of setuid/setgid binaries in a container
condition: >
spawned_process and container and
(proc.name in (su, sudo, newgrp, chsh, passwd) or
proc.is_exe_upper_layer=true)
output: >
Setuid/setgid binary executed in container
(user=%user.name container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
command=%proc.cmdline parent=%proc.pname)
priority: WARNING
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548]
- rule: Capability Gained in Container
desc: Detect when a process gains elevated capabilities
condition: >
evt.type = capset and container and
evt.arg.cap != ""
output: >
Process gained capabilities in container
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
capabilities=%evt.arg.cap command=%proc.cmdline)
priority: WARNING
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548.001]
- rule: Container with Dangerous Capabilities Started
desc: Detect container launched with dangerous capabilities
condition: >
container_started and container and
(container.image.repository != "registry.k8s.io/pause") and
(container.cap_effective contains SYS_ADMIN or
container.cap_effective contains SYS_PTRACE or
container.cap_effective contains SYS_MODULE)
output: >
Container with dangerous capabilities
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
caps=%container.cap_effective)
priority: CRITICAL
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1068]
- rule: Write to /etc/passwd in Container
desc: Detect writes to /etc/passwd inside container
condition: >
open_write and container and fd.name = /etc/passwd
output: >
Write to /etc/passwd in container
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
command=%proc.cmdline user=%user.name)
priority: CRITICAL
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1136]
# audit-policy.yaml - Capture privilege escalation events
apiVersion: audit.k8s.io/v1
kind: Policy
rules:
# Log pod creation with security context details
- level: RequestResponse
resources:
- group: ""
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["create", "update", "patch"]
# Log privilege escalation attempts
- level: RequestResponse
resources:
- group: "rbac.authorization.k8s.io"
resources: ["clusterroles", "clusterrolebindings", "roles", "rolebindings"]
verbs: ["create", "update", "patch", "bind", "escalate"]
# Log service account token requests
- level: Metadata
resources:
- group: ""
resources: ["serviceaccounts/token"]
verbs: ["create"]
# Find pods created with privileged security context
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
jq 'select(.verb == "create" and .objectRef.resource == "pods") |
select(.requestObject.spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true)'
# Find RBAC escalation attempts
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
jq 'select(.objectRef.resource == "clusterrolebindings" and .verb == "create")'
# Check pod security context
kubectl get pod <pod-name> -n <ns> -o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].securityContext}'
# Check effective capabilities
kubectl exec <pod-name> -n <ns> -- cat /proc/1/status | grep -i cap
# List pods running as root
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
jq '.items[] | select(.spec.containers[].securityContext.runAsUser == 0 or .spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace}'
# Check for hostPath volumes
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
jq '.items[] | select(.spec.volumes[]?.hostPath != null) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace, paths: [.spec.volumes[].hostPath.path]}'
restricted level for production namespaces아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Extract DPAPI-protected secrets such as credentials and browser data offline and online.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit, detect, and remediate Shadow Credentials misconfigurations on msDS-KeyCredentialLink in Active Directory. Focuses on access-controls, monitoring Event ID 5136, and credential-management hygiene.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Perform static analysis of Android APK malware samples using apktool for decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for permission analysis, manifest inspection, and suspicious API call detection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.