본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

upgrade-fab-provider

Update Flask-AppBuilder in Apache Airflow’s FAB provider, including pinned versions, dependency locks, and documentation. Check compatibility tests and review copied security code, with asset and database migration updates when the upstream release requires them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Upgrade the pinned Flask-AppBuilder (FAB) dependency in the Apache Airflow FAB provider (`providers/fab/`). Bumps the exact `flask-appbuilder==` pin and its mirror constant, regenerates `uv.lock`, drives the `test_fab_alignment.py` drift tripwire, reviews the vendored security-manager `override.py` against the new upstream FAB, and conditionally re-vendors static assets / DB migrations. Use when asked to "upgrade FAB", "bump flask-appbuilder", or move the FAB provider to a newer Flask-AppBuilder release.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Upgrade the FAB provider to a newer Flask-AppBuilder release
  • Review upstream authentication fixes against Airflow's copied code
  • Resolve compatibility failures after a dependency update
  • Update affected assets and database migrations

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md12.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->

upgrade-fab-provider

Airflow's FAB provider is tightly coupled to a specific Flask-AppBuilder release because it vendors-in and subclasses large parts of FAB's security manager. A version bump is therefore never "just change the pin" — it must be reconciled against the vendored code, and that reconciliation is enforced by a pytest alignment test, not a prek hook.

The canonical reference for a real bump is PR #66841 ("Bump flask-appbuilder to 5.2.1 and mirror new auth event hooks") — commit c72b6613fd. Read its diff first when in doubt: git show c72b6613fd.

The coupling — why this is not a one-line change

  • providers/fab/pyproject.toml:75-80 explains it: Airflow vendored FAB's security-manager code into providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/override.py (~2700 lines) as FabAirflowSecurityManagerOverride. Every bump must review that class against upstream FAB for new / changed / removed methods.
  • test_fab_alignment.py mechanically detects drift between the installed FAB package and the vendored override, and fails CI until the developer reconciles it.

Inputs

  • Target version — the FAB version to move to. If not given, use the latest release on PyPI (https://pypi.org/pypi/flask-appbuilder/json → info.version). Confirm the target with the user if it is a major or minor bump (higher reconciliation risk); a patch bump can proceed.

The files a bump touches

Always:

  1. providers/fab/pyproject.toml — line ~80, the flask-appbuilder==X.Y.Z pin (the only real dependency pin in the repo).
  2. providers/fab/tests/unit/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/test_fab_alignment.py — EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION = "X.Y.Z" (line ~43). Must move in lockstep with the pin.
  3. providers/fab/docs/index.rst — the dependency table row ``flask-appbuilder`` ``==X.Y.Z`` (line ~114).
  4. providers/fab/README.rst — the Requirements table row (line ~60). Do not hand-edit — it is auto-generated. Regenerate it from the bumped pyproject.toml with the sync-provider-readme prek hook (Step 8); the hook re-renders the table whenever pyproject.toml changes. (Pre-existing bumps that predate this hook left it to release-time regeneration; today the hook is per-commit, so CI flags the drift — run it.)
  5. uv.lock — regenerated (see Step 4 for the pinned-uv caveat).

Conditionally:

  1. providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/override.py — transplant any relevant upstream FAB changes (new auth hooks, changed signatures, ported fixes). The reference bump added +37 lines here. Note: a green alignment test does not prove the transplant is unnecessary — a security fix may live inside a method Airflow vendors (see the 5.2.2 worked example below).
  2. providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/www/** + providers/fab/www-hash.txt — only if the new FAB ships changed static assets / templates that are re-vendored (see Step 6).
  3. providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/migrations/versions/** — only if the new FAB version ships DB migrations (see Step 7).

Never: no newsfragment, and do not hand-edit providers/fab/docs/changelog.rst — providers are released from main and the release manager regenerates the changelog from git log (per providers/AGENTS.md). The commit subject is the changelog entry.

Procedure

Step 1 — Determine the target version and current state

  • Read the current pin: grep flask-appbuilder== providers/fab/pyproject.toml.
  • Resolve the target (PyPI latest, or the user's requested version).
  • Classify the jump: patch / minor / major. For minor/major, skim the FAB release notes (https://github.com/dpgaspar/Flask-AppBuilder/releases) for security-manager / model / template changes before editing.

Step 2 — Bump the three source pins

Edit in lockstep:

  • providers/fab/pyproject.toml — the flask-appbuilder==X.Y.Z line (keep the trailing # Whenever updating the version, run test_fab_alignment.py to verify. comment).
  • test_fab_alignment.py — EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION = "X.Y.Z". It is the tripwire; editing it now is fine — you will keep re-running the test until it and the other three tests pass.
  • providers/fab/docs/index.rst — the dependency-table ==X.Y.Z row.

Step 3 — Install the new FAB into the provider venv

uv --project providers/fab sync installs the new pin. Confirm the installed version:

uv run --project providers/fab python -c \
  "import importlib.metadata as m; print(m.version('flask-appbuilder'))"

Step 4 — Regenerate uv.lock (pinned uv!)

The lock must be regenerated with the repo's pinned uv version, or it drifts hundreds of unrelated marker lines:

AIRFLOW_UV_VERSION=$(grep -oE 'AIRFLOW_UV_VERSION=[0-9.]+' Dockerfile.ci | head -1 | cut -d= -f2)
uvx --from uv==$AIRFLOW_UV_VERSION uv lock

If a conflict is irrecoverable, delete uv.lock and re-run uv lock with the pinned version. Confirm the diff is limited to the FAB bump, not a wholesale marker rewrite.

Step 5 — Run the alignment test and reconcile override.py

uv run --project providers/fab pytest \
  providers/fab/tests/unit/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/test_fab_alignment.py -xvs

Under the host sandbox the test needs a writable AIRFLOW_HOME and the rerun-failures socket disabled — if it errors on a socket bind or on ~/airflow, run it as:

AIRFLOW_HOME="$TMPDIR/fab_home" uv run --project providers/fab pytest \
  providers/fab/tests/.../test_fab_alignment.py -q -p no:rerunfailures

The four tests and how to fix each:

  1. test_fab_version_matches_expected — trips on the version mismatch. It passes once EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION == installed version, but only after you have done the review below.
  2. test_no_unaudited_fab_methods — a new FAB public method exists that is neither implemented in override.py nor listed in AUDITED_EXCLUSIONS. Fix: either implement/override it in override.py, or add it to AUDITED_EXCLUSIONS with a justification comment.
  3. test_no_stale_exclusions — AUDITED_EXCLUSIONS lists a method the new FAB no longer has. Fix: remove that entry.
  4. test_shared_method_signatures_compatible — FAB changed a method signature (new required param). Fix: update the override.py signature, or add to KNOWN_SIGNATURE_DEVIATIONS if the divergence is intentional.

The manual review that the test cannot fully automate: diff the vendored override.py against the new FAB's flask_appbuilder/security/sqla/manager.py and BaseSecurityManager and transplant behavioural changes (bug fixes, new auth event hooks), not just signatures — the test only checks method presence and required params. Locate the installed source:

uv run --project providers/fab python -c \
  "import flask_appbuilder.security.sqla.manager as m; print(m.__file__)"

Step 6 — Re-vendor static assets / templates (only if changed)

If the new FAB changed frontend assets that Airflow vendors under providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/www/ (templates in templates/appbuilder/, static JS/CSS), re-vendor them, then regenerate the fingerprint:

prek run compile-fab-assets --all-files

This runs scripts/ci/prek/compile_provider_assets.py fab (pnpm build over www/) and rewrites providers/fab/www-hash.txt. A patch bump usually does not touch assets — skip this step unless FAB's templates/static changed. Commit the regenerated www-hash.txt if it changed.

Step 7 — DB migrations (only if FAB ships them)

If the new FAB adds/changes security-model tables, add the corresponding migration under providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/migrations/versions/ and run:

prek run update-migration-references-fab check-revision-heads-map-fab --all-files

Patch bumps normally have no migrations — skip unless the release notes mention schema changes.

Step 8 — Static checks + tests

prek run --from-ref main --stage pre-commit
uv run --project providers/fab pytest providers/fab/tests/unit/fab/auth_manager -xvs

The pre-commit stage runs sync-provider-readme (regenerating README.rst) and other FAB hooks. Re-run the alignment test until all four tests pass. The full provider suite is breeze testing providers-tests --test-type "Providers[fab]".

Step 9 — Self-review and commit

  • git diff main...HEAD — verify only the intended files changed, and uv.lock is a clean FAB-scoped diff.
  • Commit subject in imperative mood, plain prose, no Conventional-Commits prefix, e.g. Bump flask-appbuilder to X.Y.Z in FAB provider. Body explains why (what upstream changes were mirrored), not what.
  • No newsfragment, no changelog edit (provider release manager regenerates from git log).
  • Prepend your PR to the history list in providers/fab/CONTRIBUTING.rst so the FAB-upgrade record stays current.
  • Push to origin and open the PR per the repo's PR conventions.

Gotchas

  • EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION is a second pin. Forgetting it makes test_fab_alignment.py fail even when everything else is correct.
  • uv.lock marker drift. Always use the pinned uv (Step 4) — a bare uv lock rewrites hundreds of environment-marker lines and buries the real diff.
  • The alignment test uses AST, not import, to read FAB's SecurityManager (to avoid SQLAlchemy model-registry collisions with Airflow's vendored models). A green test proves structural alignment; it does not prove behavioural parity — Step 5's manual transplant review is still required.
  • docs/index.rst dependency table may look auto-generated but the reference PR edited it by hand; if a docs-regen prek hook rewrites it, let the hook win.
  • README.rst is generated, but the sync hook is per-commit. Don't hand-edit it; run prek run sync-provider-readme (or the full pre-commit stage) after bumping pyproject.toml — CI fails on the drift otherwise.
  • Don't touch providers/fab/docs/upgrading.rst — that is end-user guidance for upgrading the provider package in a deployment, not the developer bump workflow.

Worked example — 5.2.1 to 5.2.2 (patch)

A patch bump that needed no override.py change, but only after a real behavioural review — the green alignment test alone was not sufficient evidence:

  • FAB 5.2.2 shipped three security-manager fixes: LDAP search-filter escaping, OAuth email-allowlist regex anchoring (email + "$"), and API-login provider validation.
  • All three touch methods Airflow vendors (_search_ldap, auth_user_ldap, auth_user_oauth) — so the alignment test passing did not mean "nothing to do". Each had to be checked by hand:
    • LDAP escaping — Airflow's vendored _search_ldap already escapes via ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars (and adds filter-parenthesis validation); it was ahead of FAB. No transplant.
    • OAuth allowlist anchoring — the match lives in FAB's AuthOAuthView (views.py), and Airflow's CustomAuthOAuthView.oauth_authorized delegates via super().oauth_authorized(), so the fix is inherited from the installed FAB 5.2.2. No transplant.
    • API-login validation / Azure-JWT warning / uuid4 — in FAB core Airflow doesn't vendor. Inherited.
  • Net change set: pyproject.toml, test_fab_alignment.py, docs/index.rst, README.rst (via hook), uv.lock. Commit: Bump flask-appbuilder to 5.2.2 in FAB provider.

The lesson the skill encodes: for every security/behavioural fix in the FAB release notes, locate the method and check whether Airflow vendors it — the alignment test guards structure, you guard behaviour.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Assess Airflow Improvement Proposals by comparing Confluence specifications with pull requests, commits, and codebase files. Produce evidence-backed progress reports showing delivered items, remaining work, and specification updates needed across one or more proposals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Check implementation progress for an Airflow proposal
  • Compare specification deliverables with shipped code
  • Compile a progress report across multiple proposals
apache/airflow4.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Turn Airflow Improvement Proposals into practical guides checked against current code, or proposed user stories for design review before implementation. Organize use cases, distinguish verified examples from speculative code, and capture specific design questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Create implementation-backed guides for an Airflow proposal
  • Explore user stories before a feature is implemented
  • Separate implemented features from proposed functionality
apache/airflow4.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Helps contributors develop and fix Airflow’s Java SDK for JVM tasks. Explains public API boundaries, JAR packaging, Python coordination, communication schema updates, and the test commands used to validate changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding features or fixing bugs in the Java SDK
  • Reviewing public API and internal implementation boundaries
  • Investigating JAR discovery and JVM startup failures
apache/airflow4.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Guides contributors through adding a new programming language to Airflow, covering SDK structure, runtime coordination, communication rules, executable packaging, tests, and the documentation and configuration changes needed for a pull request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding support for a new programming language
  • Choosing how Airflow launches a language runtime
  • Implementing communication and executable bundles
apache/airflow4.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Draft commit messages, pull request titles and descriptions, and GitHub comments or reviews for Apache Airflow contributions. Follows project wording and AI attribution rules, and helps decide whether a change needs a release note.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft commit messages and pull request titles
  • Prepare pull request descriptions using the project template
  • Draft GitHub comments and review text
apache/airflow4.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Guides preparation and authorized publication of Apache Airflow changes, including existing pull request checks, remote verification, reviews, tests, rebasing, and a prefilled submission page. Also explains how to track work deferred by temporary fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning the steps for submitting Airflow changes
  • Checking existing pull requests and Git remote destinations
  • Reviewing and testing changes before pushing
apache/airflow4.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

apache의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고