Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
This skill will be invoked when the user wants to create a refactor request. You should go through the steps below. You may skip steps if you don't consider them necessary.
Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions.
Explore the repo to verify their assertions and understand the current state of the codebase.
Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them.
Interview the user about the implementation. Be extremely detailed and thorough.
Hammer out the exact scope of the implementation. Work out what you plan to change and what you plan not to change.
Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase. If there is insufficient test coverage, ask the user what their plans for testing are.
Break the implementation into a plan of tiny commits. Remember Martin Fowler's advice to "make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working."
Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan. Use the following template for the issue description:
The problem that the developer is facing, from the developer's perspective.
The solution to the problem, from the developer's perspective.
A LONG, detailed implementation plan. Write the plan in plain English, breaking down the implementation into the tiniest commits possible. Each commit should leave the codebase in a working state.
A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.
A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:
A description of the things that are out of scope for this refactor.
Any further notes about the refactor.
</refactor-plan-template>아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Audit and fix accessibility in Core UI. Use when changing or reviewing buttons, links, forms, validation, dialogs, menus, tabs, tables, keyboard interactions, focus management, accessible names, announcements, contrast, touch targets, reduced motion, or WCAG/a11y behavior.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building any system where email content triggers actions — AI agent inboxes, automated support handlers, email-to-task pipelines, or any workflow processing untrusted inbound email. Always use this skill when the user wants to receive emails and act on them programmatically, even if they don't mention "agent" — the skill contains critical security patterns (sender allowlists, content filtering, sandboxed processing) that prevent untrusted email from controlling your system.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Tasteful, subtle web UI animation following Emil Kowalski / animations.dev principles. Use when adding or reviewing interface motion — hover and press feedback, entrances and exits, modals, toasts, menus, loading and skeleton states, staggered reveals, page or view transitions — so motion stays refined and purposeful, not decorative. Covers CSS, Web Animations, and React timing/easing. Pair with the motion skill for motion/react API specifics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build animations for Expo and React Native only, using Reanimated, Gesture Handler, Expo Router, and expo-haptics. Use when the target runtime is an Expo or React Native app. Do not use it for Core Next.js web motion; use `animate` for web. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.