Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Transforms project briefs into testable specifications with user stories and acceptance criteria. Use after brainstorming, before planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
For detailed specification writing workflows, this skill delegates to spec-kit:spec-writing as the canonical implementation. Use this skill for quick specification needs; use spec-kit for thorough specification documents.
Skill(attune:project-brainstorming) instead)Skill(attune:project-planning) instead)Skill(attune:war-room) for complex choices)With spec-kit:
Skill(spec-kit:spec-writing) for methodologyWithout spec-kit:
Carry the brief's Doc audience field into the specification, and treat it as a requirement rather than a note: it decides what the project's README, guides, and tutorials may contain. When the brief did not set one, ask, do not guess.
Specify the deep-dive destination alongside it, so extraction has
somewhere to go before the first document is written: modules/
for skills, docs/deep-dive/<topic>.md for repo docs. Tier table
and cut test: scribe:slop-detector module
audience-targeting.md.
If the specification settled a design decision with real alternatives (a chosen
data model, an interface boundary, a constraint accepted), record it to
docs/tradeoffs.md before continuing (draft and confirm):
Skill(leyline:decision-journal) and append
a tradeoff entry (the decision, the options weighed, and what was
sacrificed; set phase to specify). Show the draft; append on
confirmation.docs/tradeoffs.md using the in-file
ENTRY TEMPLATE; assign the next TR-NNN id.Automatic Trigger: After Quality Checks pass and docs/specification.md is saved, MUST auto-invoke the next phase.
When continuation is invoked:
docs/specification.md exists and is non-emptySpecification complete. Saved to docs/specification.md.
Proceeding to planning phase...
Skill(attune:project-planning)
Bypass Conditions (ONLY skip continuation if ANY true):
--standalone flag was provided by the userdocs/specification.md does not exist or is empty (phase failed)Do NOT prompt the user for confirmation: this is a lightweight checkpoint, not an interactive gate. The user can always interrupt if needed.
docs/specification.md exists, is non-empty, and passes Quality Checks.docs/tradeoffs.md (or there was no meaningful design fork).Skill(spec-kit:spec-writing) - Spec-kit methodology (if available)Skill(attune:project-brainstorming) - Previous phaseSkill(attune:project-planning) - AUTO-INVOKED next phase after specificationSkill(attune:mission-orchestrator) - Full lifecycle orchestration/attune:specify - Invoke this skill/attune:specify --clarify - Run clarification workflow/attune:blueprint - Next step in workflowSee /attune:specify command documentation for complete examples.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.