Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit Skill() refs; detect hubs, isolates, and dangling targets. Use when auditing skills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Build a directed graph of Skill(plugin:name) invocations across the
marketplace and surface composition patterns: which skills are heavily
referenced (hubs), which orchestrate many others (orchestrators), which
have no incoming or outgoing references (isolates), and which point at
non-existent skills (dangling references).
The federation graph is now derivable from source rather than hand-curated.
Skill() referencesSkill(abstract:skills-eval) insteadSkill(abstract:plugin-review)Skill(abstract:hooks-eval)# Positive control first. The fixture tree has a known answer (1
# bug-class dangling ref, 1 isolate, 2 edges); a regex that stopped
# matching would report plugins/ as clean, and this catches it.
uv run pytest -o addopts= -q plugins/abstract/tests/scripts/test_skill_graph.py -k Planted
python3 plugins/abstract/scripts/skill_graph.py \
--plugins-root plugins --top-n 10
For machine-readable output:
python3 plugins/abstract/scripts/skill_graph.py \
--plugins-root plugins --format json --output reports/skill-graph.json
See modules/usage.md for full CLI reference and example workflows.
| Output | Meaning | Action when high |
|---|---|---|
| Hubs | Most-referenced skills | Treat as core API; retire with extreme care |
| Orchestrators | Skills that call many others | Verify each ref still resolves |
| Isolates | Zero in / zero out | Check role: library? entrypoint? typo? |
| Dangling: bugs | Missing internal target | Fix immediately (typo or retired skill) |
| Dangling: external | Reference to external plugin | Document plugin dependency |
| Dangling: placeholders | Template text like -NAME | Verify intentional |
See modules/interpretation.md for false-positive guidance and
isolation taxonomy.
This skill itself was scaffolded TDD-first; on first run against
plugins/, it caught two genuine dangling refs that the manual
audit (2026-04-25) had missed:
attune:makefile-generation -> abstract:makefile-dogfooder
(script name confused with skill name)imbue:karpathy-principles -> spec-kit:speckit-clarify
(command referenced as skill)Both were converted to correct command-style references in the same session.
Two ways to validate the audit output is trustworthy:
pytest -o addopts= plugins/abstract/tests/scripts/test_skill_graph.py to confirm
extraction, graph construction, ranking, isolate detection, and
dangling-ref classification all pass on the current code. The
-o addopts= flag bypasses the package-wide coverage gate, which
would otherwise fail on a single-file run.plugins/ is not reportable without itskill_graph.py runs against plugins/
without error and emits a node/edge count.Core Outputs rows resolve).Dangling: bugs entry is either fixed in the same
session or filed as a tracked issue.pytest -o addopts= plugins/abstract/tests/scripts/test_skill_graph.py
passes.Skill(abstract:skills-eval): per-skill quality scoringSkill(abstract:plugin-review): plugin manifest and structureSkill(abstract:hooks-eval): hook-specific validationSkill(abstract:rules-eval): rules directory validationplugins/abstract/scripts/skill_graph.pyplugins/abstract/tests/scripts/test_skill_graph.pydocs/quality-gates.md#skill-level-quality-gate-compositiondocs/skill-integration-guide.md#skill-role-taxonomy아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.