본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

tiered-audit

Runs a three-tier codebase audit (git history, targeted scans, full review) with gating. Use when auditing a codebase before release or after incidents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB
  • modules/escalation-criteria.md3.2 KB
  • modules/tier2-targeted.md1.8 KB
  • modules/tier3-gate.md1.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Tiered Audit

When To Use

  • Auditing codebase quality, patterns, or problems
  • Reviewing what changed on a branch before merge
  • Investigating areas of instability or churn
  • Pre-PR quality assessment

When NOT to Use

  • Reviewing a specific file (use pensive:code-reviewer)
  • Architecture-only review (use pensive:architecture-review)
  • Single-commit review (use imbue:diff-analysis)

Tier 1: Git History Audit

Always runs first. Analyzes git log, diff stats, and blame to identify areas of concern without reading any source files.

What Tier 1 Analyzes

Run the Tier 1 script for the target commit range (default: current branch against the trunk):

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/tiered_audit.py" --base {base}
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/tiered_audit.py" --base {base} --json

It runs four git queries (file churn, fix-on-fix commit subjects, per-commit diff size, newly added files), applies the thresholds in pensive.skills.tiered_audit (3+ files in a module with one changed more than twice, 200+ changed lines in one commit, 5+ new files in a module), and prints each flag beside the [E{n}] Command: that produced it, so the findings file can cite the evidence verbatim. --json adds escalation_targets and an escalate verdict for Tier 2.

Verification: an empty report on a branch you know is busy means the range is wrong. Check that {base} resolves with git merge-base {base} HEAD before trusting a quiet result.

Tier 1 Output Format

Write findings to .coordination/agents/tier1-audit.findings.md:

---
agent: tier1-audit
tier: 1
evidence_count: {N}
---

## Summary

{1-2 sentence overview of what the git history reveals}

## Churn Hotspots

{top 10 most-changed files with change counts}

For each flagged file, include:
- Location: path/to/file.py:line (most-changed function or block)
- Anchor: `verbatim source text at that line`

[E1] Command: git log --format="" --name-only ...
     Output: {relevant output}

## Fix-on-Fix Patterns

{commits that fix previous commits in the same area}

[E2] Command: git log --oneline ... | grep -iE ...
     Output: {relevant output}

## New File Clusters

{modules with 5+ new files}

## Large Diffs

{commits with 200+ line changes}

## Escalation Recommendation

{list of areas flagged for Tier 2, or "no escalation needed"}

Escalation Decision

After Tier 1 completes, check findings against the escalation criteria in modules/escalation-criteria.md.

If NO criteria are met: audit is complete. Report findings.

If criteria ARE met: list flagged areas and proceed to Tier 2 for each area sequentially.

Tier 2: Targeted Area Audit

Runs only for areas flagged by Tier 1. Each flagged area is audited one at a time, not in parallel.

What Tier 2 Analyzes

For each flagged area:

  1. Read the source files in the area
  2. Check for patterns, anti-patterns, bugs
  3. Verify test coverage exists
  4. Check documentation currency
  5. Assess architectural fit

Tier 2 Output Format

One findings file per area: .coordination/agents/tier2-{area-name}.findings.md

Each file follows the output contract for audits (see imbue:proof-of-work/modules/output-contracts).

Tier 3: Full Codebase Audit

Requires explicit user approval. See modules/escalation-criteria.md for the gate protocol.

Tier 3 should use dedicated sessions (one per area) with file-based coordination, NOT parallel subagents.

Output Contract

All tiers use this contract:

output_contract:
  required_sections:
    - summary
    - evidence
  min_evidence_count: 3    # Tier 1
  # min_evidence_count: 8  # Tier 2
  expected_artifacts: []
  retry_budget: 1
  strictness: normal

Tier 2 raises the minimum evidence count to 8 because it reads source files and should produce deeper analysis.

Verification: After each tier completes, verify the findings file exists and contains at least the minimum evidence count ([E1], [E2], etc.) before proceeding to the next tier or reporting results.

Verify Findings Are Grounded (tiered-audit:findings-verified)

Write findings to .review/findings.json, run the citation verifier (Skill(imbue:review-core) Step 5), and drop or label UNVERIFIED any the verifier rejects.

Exit Criteria

  • Tier 1 findings file exists at .coordination/agents/tier1-audit.findings.md and contains at least 3 evidence entries ([E1]–[E3]).
  • Tier 2 is only started for areas explicitly flagged by Tier 1 escalation criteria.
  • Every reported finding carries a Location + verbatim Anchor confirmed by citation_verifier.py (exit 0), or unverified findings were dropped or labeled UNVERIFIED.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

athola/claude-night-market3432026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

athola/claude-night-market3432026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

athola/claude-night-market3432026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

athola/claude-night-market3432026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

athola/claude-night-market3432026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

athola/claude-night-market3432026년 10월 24일 업데이트

athola의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고