Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Full Self Driving — autonomous release loop that processes all auto-dev-eligible GitHub issues until none remain, by repeatedly running /pipeline auto-dev then /homework.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Autonomous release loop. Equivalent to running:
/goal "모든 이슈가 처리될 때까지" /loop "/pipeline auto-dev -> /homework"
This is a thin alias / orchestrator skill. It does not implement loop, issue-polling, release, or verification logic — it delegates entirely to existing skills.
/omcustom:fsd # Run until all auto-dev-eligible issues are exhausted
/omcustom:fsd 3 # Optional: cap at N releases (default: unlimited)
No arguments are required. The default behavior runs until the auto-dev-eligible issue set is empty.
FSD expands into:
/goal wrapper — applies disciplined goal-to-execution workflow:
goal skill/loop recurrence — self-paced loop (model decides cadence), each iteration runs:
/pipeline auto-dev — full release pipeline for the next eligible issue/homework — retrospective 찐빠 audit gateThe loop converges naturally when the auto-dev-eligible issue set reaches 0. Issue eligibility follows /pipeline auto-dev label selection exactly:
verify-ready (preferred), unlabeled auto-dev candidatesverify-done, needs-review, decision-needed labelsDo NOT invent new label logic here — defer to the pipeline skill's auto-dev issue selection.
[FSD Iteration N]
├── /pipeline auto-dev → one release (PR create → merge → npm publish → milestone close)
├── /homework → extract 찐빠, confirm gate (or --dry-run if requested)
└── Check: any eligible issues remain?
├── YES → next iteration
└── NO → [FSD Done] converged naturally
Each iteration operates under full project rules — no relaxation because FSD is autonomous:
| Rule | Applies |
|---|---|
| R001 (safety) | Destructive ops still require explicit approval. Credential guardrails always active. |
| R009 (parallel) | Independent subtasks within each pipeline iteration run in parallel. |
| R010 (orchestration) | All file modifications delegated to specialist subagents. mgr-gitnerd for git ops. |
| R017 (sync verification) | mgr-sauron passes required before any commit. |
| R020 (completion verification) | Each release verified via npm view, gh release view, closed issues before [Done]. |
/homework runs as a retrospective gate between iterations — findings go through omcustom-feedback's Phase 4A confirmation gate. The loop does NOT skip homework on the grounds that it is "automated". If homework requires user confirmation (e.g., to file a feedback issue), the loop pauses and waits.
If a release operation triggers the safety classifier, the current iteration stops and surfaces the block to the user before continuing.
| Scenario | Use FSD? |
|---|---|
| Multiple eligible issues ready to process autonomously | YES |
| Session where the user wants to "let it run" through the backlog | YES |
| Verifying the autonomous release loop pattern from session memory | YES |
| Single targeted issue fix | NO — use /pipeline auto-dev directly |
| Exploratory research / planning only | NO — use /research or /deep-plan |
| Only one issue and it needs human judgment | NO — use /pipeline auto-dev with manual oversight |
decision-needed or needs-review items only (loop converges immediately — just use /pipeline auto-dev once)Pass a numeric argument to cap at N releases:
/omcustom:fsd 3 # Process at most 3 issues this FSD run
This corresponds to the -max parameter used in the manual pattern. Default is unlimited (run until eligible issues exhausted). The cap is advisory — the pipeline itself may stop earlier if the eligible set runs out before the cap is reached.
This skill was extracted from the manual pattern used in Session 114 (2026-06-09):
/goal "모든 이슈가 처리될 때까지" /loop "/pipeline auto-dev -> /homework"
That session ran 2 iterations (v0.177.0 and v0.178.0) before converging with 0 eligible issues remaining. FSD codifies this pattern as a first-class invocable command.
| Skill / Rule | Role |
|---|---|
goal | Disciplined goal-to-execution wrapper — objective parse, gap detection, R020 verification |
omcustom-loop | Session auto-continuation via SubagentStop hook — keeps the loop alive during background agent work |
pipeline | /pipeline auto-dev — the core release pipeline per iteration |
homework | Retrospective 찐빠 audit gate per iteration |
| R001 (safety) | Destructive ops require approval; credential guardrails |
| R009 (parallel execution) | Parallel subtasks within each pipeline iteration |
| R010 (orchestrator coordination) | All file writes delegated; mgr-gitnerd for git |
| R017 (sync verification) | mgr-sauron required before commit/push |
| R020 (completion verification) | Actual outcome verified before declaring each release done |
This skill is intentionally a thin alias. It does NOT duplicate:
pipeline)omcustom-loop + SubagentStop hook)pipeline auto-dev)homework)goal)If any of those underlying skills evolve, FSD automatically benefits — its only responsibility is declaring the intent and forwarding to the right components.
When this skill delegates work via Agent tool calls, ALL Agent tool calls MUST include mode: "bypassPermissions" per R010 Universal bypassPermissions.
Artifacts from each iteration follow the conventions of the constituent skills:
.claude/outputs/sessions/{YYYY-MM-DD}/pipeline-auto-dev-{HHmmss}.md.claude/outputs/sessions/{YYYY-MM-DD}/homework-{HHmmss}.md아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Auto-detect project context and optimize harness — deactivate unused agents/skills, suggest missing experts, generate project profile
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apache Airflow best practices for DAG authoring, testing, and production deployment
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pre-routing ambiguity analysis — scores request clarity and asks clarifying questions when needed (inspired by ouroboros)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.