본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

transaction-trace-analysis

Teaches evidence-based analysis of transaction logs and traces. Use when reconstructing transaction behavior from tables, TSV/CSV files, timestamps, counters, object histories, validation records, abort records, retries, partial logs, or when producing classified transaction outputs from trace evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(8)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB
  • references/evidence-quality-and-uncertainty.md1.4 KB
  • references/object-version-history.md1.4 KB
  • references/output-classification-patterns.md2.3 KB
  • references/timestamp-and-ordering-fields.md1.4 KB
  • references/trace-schema-normalization.md2.5 KB
  • references/transaction-history-reconstruction.md1.4 KB
  • references/validation-and-abort-records.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Transaction Trace Analysis

Use this skill when the task provides concrete logs, tables, counters, timestamps, or partial records and asks you to infer transaction behavior.

This skill is about reconstruction under partial evidence:

  • normalize columns into a stable event vocabulary
  • reconstruct per-transaction intent and per-object version timelines
  • join them through explicit fields (not through row order guesses)
  • produce a minimal, auditable classification for the required output

Quick Reference (pick the next file to read)

If you need…Read
Mapping weird columns into tx/key/op/timestamp/counter/status/reasontrace-schema-normalization.md
Grouping events per transaction and avoiding “attempt vs request” mixupstransaction-history-reconstruction.md
Reconstructing a per-key version timeline from writes/validationobject-version-history.md
Interpreting timestamp/counter semantics and scope correctlytimestamp-and-ordering-fields.md
Understanding validation failures, abort reasons, and conservative checksvalidation-and-abort-records.md
Avoiding overclaims when the trace is incompleteevidence-quality-and-uncertainty.md
Emitting deduped/sorted ids and minimal justificationsoutput-classification-patterns.md

Trace Ledger (what you build first)

Build two tiny ledgers before doing any deep inference:

Transaction ledger

txn_id -> {
  seen_keys: [...],
  read-evidence: (key, observed_version_fields...),
  write-evidence: (key, installed_version_fields...),
  validation/abort-evidence: [...],
  candidate_commit_fields: ...,
}

Object ledger

key -> timeline [
  { event: write/abort/validate, txn_id, version_fields, counter_fields },
  ...
]

Only after both exist should you attempt joins like “did T’s read become stale?” or “could an aborted T have committed?”

Workflow (operational)

  1. Schema normalization: name every column; identify scope for each counter/timestamp.
  2. Per-txn reconstruction: summarize each txn’s evidence and candidate serialization point fields.
  3. Per-key reconstruction: build a timeline per key; validate what orders it (wts? counter?).
  4. Decision modeling: re-express the protocol’s decision rule in terms of trace fields.
  5. Classification: prove “must abort” vs “could commit” vs “unknown from evidence.”
  6. Output: dedupe ids, sort if required, write exact format.

Common Pitfalls

  • Treating per-key counters as global order.
  • Using file row order as time order without justification.
  • Calling something ‘unnecessary’ without exhibiting a safe order consistent with evidence.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Perform various data analysis on SEC 13-F and obtain some insights of fund activities such as number of holdings, AUM, and change of holdings between two quarters.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench1.9천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트

AC branch pi-model power flow equations (P/Q and |S|) with transformer tap ratio and phase shift, matching `acopf-math-model.md` and MATPOWER branch fields. Use when computing branch flows in either direction, aggregating bus injections for nodal balance, checking MVA (rateA) limits, computing branch loading %, or debugging sign/units issues in AC power flow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench1.9천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트

Redact text from PDF documents for blind review anonymization

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench1.9천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트

Use when checking simplified ADA-derived plan-view bathroom accessibility constraints such as turning space, door clear width, toilet centerline, grab bars, and lavatory knee/toe clearance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench1.9천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트

Analyze failed GitHub Action jobs for a pull request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench1.9천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트

Use when extracting plan-view architectural geometry from DXF files with semantic CAD layers, especially when outputs must normalize rooms, doors, fixtures, clearances, and grab bars into machine-checkable JSON.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench1.9천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트

benchflow-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고