Use when committing or pushing changes and the repository needs a version bump. Analyzes commits using conventional commit prefixes to determine whether the next release is a major, minor, or patch increment. Also use when the user asks about versioning, release planning, or changelog generation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Determine the next version from commit history when preparing a release. The highest-impact release-relevant commit drives the bump.
Follows Semantic Versioning 2.0.0:
| Bump | Trigger | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Major (X.0.0) | Breaking change | feat!:, fix!:, BREAKING CHANGE: in body/footer |
| Minor (x.Y.0) | New feature | feat:, feature: |
| Patch (x.y.Z) | Everything else | fix:, chore:, docs:, style:, refactor:, test:, ci:, perf: |
The highest bump wins: if any commit is major, the release is major — regardless of how many patches are in the batch.
Run the analysis script:
uv run skills/semantic-versioning/scripts/version-bump.py [repo-path]
Options:
--apply — update the version file after confirmation--tag — also create a git tagThe script auto-detects where the version lives:
| File | Field |
|---|---|
pyproject.toml | [project] version = "x.y.z" |
package.json | "version": "x.y.z" |
Cargo.toml | [package] version = "x.y.z" |
VERSION | Plain text file |
--apply) — update version file and optionally tagNever auto-apply version changes without user confirmation.
For best results, follow conventional commits:
<type>[optional scope][!]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
If commits don't follow conventional format, fall back to keyword analysis:
For versions 0.y.z (pre-stable):
0.y.z until the project declares stability| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
Bumping major for every feat! in pre-1.0 | Pre-1.0: breaking changes go in minor |
| Forgetting to tag after version bump | Always tag: git tag v<version> |
| Version in multiple files getting out of sync | Use the script to update all detected version files |
| Non-conventional commit messages | Fall back to keyword analysis, but encourage conventional commits |
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
User asks for design, planning, or approach exploration before implementation. Covers new features, components, refactors, or architecture decisions. Creates design docs and proposes approaches with trade-offs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when starting work in a repository under repositories/ that may lack CI configuration. Detects missing CI workflows (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI) and alerts the user to add one. Skips repos marked as research-only.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to measure command execution time or optimize a feedback loop. Records explicit measurements and recommends faster alternatives such as unit tests versus integration tests. It is opt-in; it does not run on every command.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Team conventions for Python development — credentials, API clients, LLM response parsing, testing patterns, and data pipeline structure. Covers dotenv loading, retry logic, secret validation, and pipeline anti-patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Measurement-driven code refactoring — profile before changing, measure after, keep only if metrics improve. Covers complexity reduction, extraction patterns, and bulk refactoring for mechanical changes across many files.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Scan projects for credential leaks, secrets in code, insecure patterns, LLM API key exposure, PII leakage to external AI services, and .env/.gitignore misconfigurations. Especially useful for data and API integrations, regardless of implementation language.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.