AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트
무료GitHub에 공개
agentic-engineering
Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기포함된 파일(1)
- SKILL.md1.7 KB
SKILL.md(원문)
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Agentic Engineering
Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
Operating Principles
- Define completion criteria before execution.
- Decompose work into agent-sized units.
- Route model tiers by task complexity.
- Measure with evals and regression checks.
Eval-First Loop
- Define capability eval and regression eval.
- Run baseline and capture failure signatures.
- Execute implementation.
- Re-run evals and compare deltas.
Task Decomposition
Apply the 15-minute unit rule:
- each unit should be independently verifiable
- each unit should have a single dominant risk
- each unit should expose a clear done condition
Model Routing
- Haiku: classification, boilerplate transforms, narrow edits
- Sonnet: implementation and refactors
- Opus: architecture, root-cause analysis, multi-file invariants
Session Strategy
- Continue session for closely-coupled units.
- Start fresh session after major phase transitions.
- Compact after milestone completion, not during active debugging.
Review Focus for AI-Generated Code
Prioritize:
- invariants and edge cases
- error boundaries
- security and auth assumptions
- hidden coupling and rollout risk
Do not waste review cycles on style-only disagreements when automated format/lint already enforce style.
Cost Discipline
Track per task:
- model
- token estimate
- retries
- wall-clock time
- success/failure
Escalate model tier only when lower tier fails with a clear reasoning gap.
리뷰
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
댓글
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
같은 저장소의 스킬
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트