본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

alphafold-database-fetch-and-analyze

Retrieve and analyze AlphaFold predicted structures for a protein. Use when the user provides a specific UniProt Accession ID and wants structural confidence metrics (pLDDT), domain boundary analysis, or disorder assessment. Do not use if the user only has a protein name, gene name, or amino acid sequence — ask for a UniProt ID first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

AlphaFold Database: Fetch and Analyze

Prerequisites

  1. uv: Read the uv skill and follow its Setup instructions to ensure uv is installed and on PATH.
  2. User Notification: If .licenses/alphafold_database_fetch_and_analyze_LICENSE.txt does not already exist in the workspace root directory then (1) prominently notify the user to check the terms at https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/, then (2) create the file recording the notification text and timestamp.

Overview

Downloads AlphaFold predicted structures (mmCIF) and Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) matrices from the AlphaFold Database for a given UniProt ID, then performs automated heuristic analysis on structural confidence (pLDDT), intrinsically disordered regions, rigid domain boundaries, and inter-domain flexibility.

Do NOT use when:

  • The user only has a protein name, gene name, or amino acid sequence (no UniProt ID) — ask them to look up the ID on UniProt.
  • The user wants to search for structural homologs (use Foldseek).
  • The user wants to run AlphaFold predictions on a custom sequence.
  • The user needs experimental PDB structures (use RCSB PDB).

Core Rules

  • Use the Wrapper: ALWAYS execute the provided helper scripts to query the database rather than accessing the database directly. The scripts automatically enforce the required rate limit gracefully.
  • Do not attempt to calculate domain boundaries or assess structural disorder yourself; always rely on the output provided by the script.
  • If this skill is used, ensure this is mentioned in the output.

Utility Scripts

1. Fetch Structure Files

Downloads the .cif structure file, _predicted_aligned_error.json, and API metadata JSON (-metadata.json) for a UniProt ID. Handles fragment fallback for very large proteins.

Examples:

uv run scripts/fetch_structure.py P00520 -o /path/to/output/
uv run scripts/fetch_structure.py P04637 -o /path/to/custom_results/

Always specify -o with an absolute path or a path relative to the user's project root, never a path relative to the skill directory.

2. Analyze pLDDT Confidence

Reads pLDDT confidence metrics from a saved AFDB metadata JSON file (produced by fetch_structure.py) and prints a heuristic confidence assessment (structured, disordered, mixed).

Example:

uv run scripts/analyze_plddt.py ./data/AF-P00520-F1-metadata.json

3. Analyze PAE / Domain Boundaries

Reads a downloaded PAE JSON file and detects rigid domain boundaries using a sliding-window PAE heuristic.

Example:

uv run scripts/analyze_pae.py ./data/AF-P00520-F1-predicted_aligned_error_v6.json

Interpreting the Output

The script prints analysis to stdout. Read it carefully and synthesize the results for the user:

  1. Isoform / Large Protein Warning (MANDATORY): Check the script output for any [!] WARNING lines. If the script reports that no canonical entry was found and an isoform was used, or if the protein is very large (>2700 AAs), you MUST prominently relay this warning to the user. Do not omit this warning.
  2. Synthesize the Structural Analysis: Combine the "pLDDT Conclusion" and the "PAE Structural Conclusion" into a single, cohesive overall summary. Describe the protein's overall folding confidence, the presence of disordered regions, and its rigid domain layout.
  3. Highlight the supporting metrics:
    • Overall Global pLDDT and the breakdown of fraction confidence (especially Very Low vs. Very High).
    • Domain Boundary Analysis (number of distinct global domains and their specific residue ranges).
  4. Explicit Disorder Warning: If the analysis concludes that the protein is highly intrinsically disordered (e.g., high fraction of <50 pLDDT or lack of rigid domains), issue a separate, prominent warning. Advise the user against proceeding with whole-protein downstream structural analysis (like Foldseek or docking). If small ordered domains exist amidst the disorder, advise the user to restrict any future analysis strictly to those specific residue boundaries.
  5. Remind the user that per-residue pLDDT is embedded in the B-factor column of the downloaded mmCIF file.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

bg-szy의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고