AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
NVIDIA NeMo Retriever deployment and usage guidance for local retrieval services, corpus ingestion, and grounded question-answering workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
The retriever CLI indexes a folder of PDFs into LanceDB (retriever ingest) and serves vector search over it (retriever query). For any task about searching/answering questions across a folder of PDFs, use this CLI — do not write a custom RAG.
Beyond PDFs and beyond semantic search. retriever ingest also handles images, Office, HTML, TXT, audio, and video — see references/setup.md for the per-format recipe and references/install.md for the install extras ([multimedia], libreoffice, ffmpeg). For non-semantic operations — page filter, verbatim quote with citation, corpus-level aggregate, chart/image caption hits — see references/query.md. Don't fall back to native Read/Grep/Python on non-PDF inputs.
retriever is missing)If command -v retriever returns nothing, follow references/install.md to install the NeMo Retriever Library before proceeding. It prints RETRIEVER_VENV=<path>; substitute that path for <RETRIEVER_VENV> in every example in this skill (setup, query, troubleshooting, and the CLI references).
| Turn type | Read this once | Then execute |
|---|---|---|
Setup turn (first turn — ./lancedb/nv-ingest.lance doesn't exist) | references/setup.md | Build the index |
| Query turn (every subsequent turn — user asks a question) | references/query.md | One retriever query call |
| Anything errored or returned empty | references/troubleshooting.md | Apply the named recovery; do not improvise |
For the full retriever ingest / retriever query CLI specs, see references/cli/ingest.md and references/cli/query.md. You do not need these for routine turns — <RETRIEVER_VENV>/bin/retriever <subcommand> --help is faster.
Before ingesting a mixed folder, inventory extensions (find <dir> -name '*.*' | sed 's/.*\.//' | sort -u) — --input-type=auto silently drops anything outside the supported set. See references/troubleshooting.md "Unsupported file types".
references/setup.md). STOP after the index lands.retriever query, +1 optional targeted text-extract per references/query.md. Reply and then STOP.TodoWrite, Glob, Grep, Read of whole PDFs, re-running setup, spawning subagents, speculative "confirmation" calls.Long query turns (5+ tool calls, 1M+ cache-read tokens) cost ~5× a disciplined turn and almost always still produce the wrong answer. Answering partially beats timing out.
Before claiming "skill applied successfully":
This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
$CODEX_HOME/skills/nemo-retriever and restart Codex after major changes.Preferred MCP Server: None required
SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.