본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

nemo-retriever

NVIDIA NeMo Retriever deployment and usage guidance for local retrieval services, corpus ingestion, and grounded question-answering workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • BENCHMARK.md4.1 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md3.0 KB
  • skill-card.md4.1 KB
  • skill.oms.sig6.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

nemo-retriever

The retriever CLI indexes a folder of PDFs into LanceDB (retriever ingest) and serves vector search over it (retriever query). For any task about searching/answering questions across a folder of PDFs, use this CLI — do not write a custom RAG.

Beyond PDFs and beyond semantic search. retriever ingest also handles images, Office, HTML, TXT, audio, and video — see references/setup.md for the per-format recipe and references/install.md for the install extras ([multimedia], libreoffice, ffmpeg). For non-semantic operations — page filter, verbatim quote with citation, corpus-level aggregate, chart/image caption hits — see references/query.md. Don't fall back to native Read/Grep/Python on non-PDF inputs.

Install (if retriever is missing)

If command -v retriever returns nothing, follow references/install.md to install the NeMo Retriever Library before proceeding. It prints RETRIEVER_VENV=<path>; substitute that path for <RETRIEVER_VENV> in every example in this skill (setup, query, troubleshooting, and the CLI references).

Workflow — read the reference for the current phase, then execute

Turn typeRead this onceThen execute
Setup turn (first turn — ./lancedb/nv-ingest.lance doesn't exist)references/setup.mdBuild the index
Query turn (every subsequent turn — user asks a question)references/query.mdOne retriever query call
Anything errored or returned emptyreferences/troubleshooting.mdApply the named recovery; do not improvise

For the full retriever ingest / retriever query CLI specs, see references/cli/ingest.md and references/cli/query.md. You do not need these for routine turns — <RETRIEVER_VENV>/bin/retriever <subcommand> --help is faster.

Before ingesting a mixed folder, inventory extensions (find <dir> -name '*.*' | sed 's/.*\.//' | sort -u) — --input-type=auto silently drops anything outside the supported set. See references/troubleshooting.md "Unsupported file types".

Hard limits (apply to every turn)

  • Setup turn: build the index in one shell command (see references/setup.md). STOP after the index lands.
  • Query turn: at most 2 Bash calls — 1 retriever query, +1 optional targeted text-extract per references/query.md. Reply and then STOP.
  • No narration between tool calls. Tokens you emit between calls become input + cached input for every later turn — quadratic cost. Go straight from reading the summary to writing the JSON file.
  • Banned: TodoWrite, Glob, Grep, Read of whole PDFs, re-running setup, spawning subagents, speculative "confirmation" calls.

Long query turns (5+ tool calls, 1M+ cache-read tokens) cost ~5× a disciplined turn and almost always still produce the wrong answer. Answering partially beats timing out.

Anti-Patterns

  • Indexing content before clarifying corpus boundaries, freshness, or ownership: Retrieval quality collapses when the source of truth is unstable.
  • Treating embedding, chunking, and backend choices as invisible defaults: They change recall, latency, and storage cost in user-visible ways.
  • Claiming grounded answers without checking the retrieved passages that supported them.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The workflow names the corpus, index or backend choice, and the query path before answering deployment or QA questions.
  2. Pass/fail: Retrieval checks include at least one real query and inspection of the supporting passages or scores.
  3. Pass/fail: Ingestion or indexing advice keeps corpus freshness and reindex cost visible instead of implicit.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Apply the workflow to a retriever that answers quickly but returns stale passages after a corpus update.
  5. Success metric: The user gets a reproducible retriever setup or debugging path with live retrieval evidence.
<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/nemo-retriever and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: None required

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the nemo-retriever skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill.
  • Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • notebooklm-management: Use it when retrieval-backed research needs a notebook-style grounding workflow.
  • development-workflow: Use it when the retriever work also needs scoped implementation and validation checkpoints.
  • cloud-design-patterns: Use it when the retriever deployment choice also needs storage, scaling, or service-boundary analysis.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026년 9월 8일 업데이트

bg-szy의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고