본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

domain-modeling

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use only when actively changing glossary or ubiquitous-language terms, or recording a durable architectural decision; merely reading a glossary is not a trigger.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB
  • ADR-FORMAT.md2.7 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml261 B
  • GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Domain Modeling

Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline: challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading GLOSSARY.md for vocabulary is not this skill: that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/
├── GLOSSARY.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/
│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/

If GLOSSARY-MAP.md or CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, read its pointers to find the existing contexts:

/
├── GLOSSARY-MAP.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│   ├── ordering/
│   │   ├── GLOSSARY.md
│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions
│   └── billing/
│       ├── GLOSSARY.md
│       └── docs/adr/

Use existing GLOSSARY.md or CONTEXT.md files and their map pointers; do not migrate or duplicate them. When authorized to write and no glossary exists, create GLOSSARY.md for the first resolved term. Create docs/adr/ only for the first accepted ADR. Otherwise render the exact proposed change in chat.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When a term conflicts with the existing GLOSSARY.md or CONTEXT.md language, surface the conflict. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y. Which is it?"

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account': do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible. Which is right?"

Update the existing glossary inline

When a term is resolved and writing is authorized, update the existing glossary, or GLOSSARY.md for a new one. Otherwise render the exact proposed update in chat. Don't batch these up: capture them as they happen. Use the format in GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md.

Keep the existing GLOSSARY.md or CONTEXT.md focused on domain terms, without implementation details or decisions. Use ADRs for durable decisions.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

  1. Hard to reverse: the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
  2. Surprising without context: a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
  3. The result of a real trade-off: there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adhx

무료

Read public X/Twitter post URLs as structured evidence through the ADHX API. Use for relevant user-provided or research-discovered x.com, twitter.com, or adhx.com links. ADHX does not search X, and long-form Article content may be incomplete.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bioinformatist/codex-base92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Design, review, or report a measured performance comparison. Use for benchmark methodology, speedup or regression claims, and performance-based choices; not generic performance discussion, ordinary dependency bumps, local renames, or prose edits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bioinformatist/codex-base92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Trace what an actual code change could break beyond its diff when interfaces, serialized data, database schemas, configuration, caches, lifecycle ordering, or cross-language consumers are involved. Use for explicit impact analysis; not local renames, prose edits, ordinary dependency bumps, or generic architecture discussion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bioinformatist/codex-base92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules, interfaces, seams, adapters, leverage, and locality. Use when designing or reshaping module boundaries, making code more testable, or evaluating interface depth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bioinformatist/codex-base92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Plan or implement retirement of a system, API, feature, persisted configuration, or database shape. Use for compatibility cutovers, explicit deprecation review, or an explicit unreleased replacement decision, including determining whether consumers or data exist; not ordinary dependency bumps, local renames, prose edits, or generic architecture discussion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bioinformatist/codex-base92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs, regressions, flaky failures, and performance problems with unclear cause. Use for root-cause debugging after a concrete symptom exists; do not use for routine implementation or speculative cleanup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bioinformatist/codex-base92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

bioinformatist의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고