Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Work with FASTQ quality scores using Biopython. Use when analyzing read quality, filtering by quality, trimming low-quality bases, or generating quality reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Reference examples tested with: BioPython 1.83+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturesIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Filter my FASTQ reads by quality score" → Access, analyze, and filter Phred quality scores, trim low-quality bases, and generate per-position quality profiles.
SeqIO.parse() with letter_annotations['phred_quality'] (BioPython)Analyze and manipulate FASTQ quality scores using Biopython.
from Bio import SeqIO
from Bio.Seq import Seq
Quality scores are stored in letter_annotations['phred_quality'] as a list of integers.
for record in SeqIO.parse('reads.fastq', 'fastq'):
qualities = record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']
print(record.id, qualities[:10]) # First 10 quality scores
| Phred Score | Error Probability | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 1 in 10 | 90% |
| 20 | 1 in 100 | 99% |
| 30 | 1 in 1000 | 99.9% |
| 40 | 1 in 10000 | 99.99% |
for record in SeqIO.parse('reads.fastq', 'fastq'):
quals = record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']
avg_qual = sum(quals) / len(quals)
print(f'{record.id}: {avg_qual:.1f}')
def high_quality_reads(records, min_avg_qual=20):
for record in records:
quals = record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']
if sum(quals) / len(quals) >= min_avg_qual:
yield record
records = SeqIO.parse('reads.fastq', 'fastq')
good_reads = high_quality_reads(records, min_avg_qual=25)
SeqIO.write(good_reads, 'filtered.fastq', 'fastq')
def all_bases_above(records, min_qual=20):
for record in records:
if min(record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']) >= min_qual:
yield record
def trim_low_quality(record, min_qual=20):
quals = record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']
trim_pos = len(quals)
for i in range(len(quals) - 1, -1, -1):
if quals[i] >= min_qual:
trim_pos = i + 1
break
return record[:trim_pos]
records = SeqIO.parse('reads.fastq', 'fastq')
trimmed = (trim_low_quality(rec) for rec in records)
SeqIO.write(trimmed, 'trimmed.fastq', 'fastq')
Goal: Trim a read at the first position where average quality in a sliding window drops below threshold.
Approach: Slide a fixed-size window across quality scores; when the window average falls below the cutoff, truncate the record at that position.
Reference (BioPython 1.83+):
def sliding_window_trim(record, window_size=5, min_avg_qual=20):
quals = record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']
for i in range(len(quals) - window_size + 1):
window = quals[i:i + window_size]
if sum(window) / window_size < min_avg_qual:
return record[:i] if i > 0 else None
return record
import statistics
all_quals = []
for record in SeqIO.parse('reads.fastq', 'fastq'):
all_quals.extend(record.letter_annotations['phred_quality'])
print(f'Mean quality: {statistics.mean(all_quals):.1f}')
print(f'Median quality: {statistics.median(all_quals):.1f}')
print(f'Min quality: {min(all_quals)}')
print(f'Max quality: {max(all_quals)}')
Goal: Compute mean quality at each read position to identify systematic quality drops (e.g., read-end degradation).
Approach: Accumulate quality scores by position across all reads, then compute per-position means.
Reference (BioPython 1.83+):
from collections import defaultdict
position_quals = defaultdict(list)
for record in SeqIO.parse('reads.fastq', 'fastq'):
for i, q in enumerate(record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']):
position_quals[i].append(q)
for pos in sorted(position_quals.keys())[:20]:
quals = position_quals[pos]
print(f'Position {pos}: mean={sum(quals)/len(quals):.1f}')
thresholds = [20, 25, 30, 35]
counts = {t: 0 for t in thresholds}
for record in SeqIO.parse('reads.fastq', 'fastq'):
avg = sum(record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']) / len(record.seq)
for t in thresholds:
if avg >= t:
counts[t] += 1
for t, c in counts.items():
print(f'Q>={t}: {c} reads')
def clean_read(record, min_qual=20):
seq = str(record.seq)
quals = record.letter_annotations['phred_quality']
keep = [(s, q) for s, q in zip(seq, quals) if s != 'N' and q >= min_qual]
if not keep:
return None
new_seq, new_quals = zip(*keep)
new_record = record[:0] # Empty copy with same metadata
new_record.seq = Seq(''.join(new_seq))
new_record.letter_annotations['phred_quality'] = list(new_quals)
return new_record
| Variant | Format String | Quality Encoding | ASCII Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanger/Illumina 1.8+ | 'fastq' | Phred+33 (standard) | 33-126 |
| Solexa | 'fastq-solexa' | Solexa+64 | 59-126 |
| Illumina 1.3-1.7 | 'fastq-illumina' | Phred+64 | 64-126 |
Most modern data uses standard 'fastq' (Sanger/Illumina 1.8+).
For legacy data using different quality encodings:
from Bio.SeqIO.QualityIO import phred_quality_from_solexa, solexa_quality_from_phred
from Bio.SeqIO.QualityIO import phred_quality_from_solexa
# Convert single score
solexa_score = 10
phred_score = phred_quality_from_solexa(solexa_score)
# Convert list of scores
solexa_scores = [10, 20, 30, 40]
phred_scores = [phred_quality_from_solexa(s) for s in solexa_scores]
from Bio.SeqIO.QualityIO import solexa_quality_from_phred
phred_score = 30
solexa_score = solexa_quality_from_phred(phred_score)
from Bio import SeqIO
# Read old Illumina format, write standard format
records = SeqIO.parse('old_reads.fastq', 'fastq-illumina')
SeqIO.write(records, 'standard_reads.fastq', 'fastq')
# Read Solexa format, write standard format
records = SeqIO.parse('solexa_reads.fastq', 'fastq-solexa')
SeqIO.write(records, 'standard_reads.fastq', 'fastq')
Goal: Determine which FASTQ quality encoding (Sanger, Solexa, or Illumina 1.3+) a file uses.
Approach: Sample quality lines, find the minimum ASCII value, and compare against known offset ranges.
Reference (BioPython 1.83+):
def detect_quality_encoding(filepath, sample_size=1000):
min_qual = 126
max_qual = 0
count = 0
with open(filepath) as f:
for i, line in enumerate(f):
if i % 4 == 3: # Quality line
for char in line.strip():
min_qual = min(min_qual, ord(char))
max_qual = max(max_qual, ord(char))
count += 1
if count >= sample_size:
break
if min_qual < 59:
return 'fastq' # Sanger/Illumina 1.8+ (Phred+33)
elif min_qual < 64:
return 'fastq-solexa' # Solexa+64
else:
return 'fastq-illumina' # Illumina 1.3+ (Phred+64)
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
KeyError: 'phred_quality' | Not FASTQ or wrong variant | Check format, try 'fastq-illumina' |
| Quality scores all 0 | Wrong encoding assumed | Try different FASTQ variant |
| Trimmed reads empty | Too aggressive trimming | Lower quality threshold |
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AlphaFold2 / AlphaFold-Multimer structure prediction for validation and confidence scoring. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm2-sequence-scoring. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Workflow for event-level and isoform-level splicing analysis with sashimi-ready outputs and splice QC.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
ATAC-seq processing with assay QC, MACS3 peak calling, consensus peak matrices, differential accessibility, and motif or footprint follow-up.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.