Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Differential abundance and state analysis for cytometry data. Compare cell populations between conditions using statistical methods. Use when testing for significant changes in cell frequencies or marker expression between groups.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Reference examples tested with: R stats (base), edgeR 4.0+, ggplot2 3.5+, limma 3.58+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parametersIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Compare cell populations between my conditions" → Test for significant changes in cell type frequencies (differential abundance) or marker expression levels (differential state) between experimental groups.
CATALYST::testDA_edgeR() or diffcyt::testDA_GLMM()Goal: Test which cell population clusters differ in frequency between experimental conditions.
Approach: Create a design matrix and contrast from sample metadata, then run edgeR-based differential abundance testing on cluster counts per sample using testDA_edgeR from the diffcyt framework.
library(CATALYST)
library(diffcyt)
# Load clustered data
sce <- readRDS('sce_clustered.rds')
# Create design matrix
design <- createDesignMatrix(ei(sce), cols_design = 'condition')
# Create contrast
contrast <- createContrast(c(0, 1)) # Treatment vs Control
# Differential abundance test
res_DA <- testDA_edgeR(sce, design, contrast, cluster_id = 'meta20')
# View results
rowData(res_DA)$cluster_id
rowData(res_DA)$p_adj
# Significant clusters
sig_DA <- rowData(res_DA)$p_adj < 0.05
table(sig_DA)
# Test for marker expression differences within clusters
res_DS <- testDS_limma(sce, design, contrast,
cluster_id = 'meta20',
markers_include = rownames(sce)[rowData(sce)$marker_class == 'state'])
# Results per marker per cluster
ds_results <- rowData(res_DS)
# DA results heatmap
plotDiffHeatmap(sce, res_DA, all = TRUE, fdr = 0.05)
# DS results heatmap
plotDiffHeatmap(sce, res_DS, all = TRUE, fdr = 0.05)
# Abundance by condition
plotAbundances(sce, k = 'meta20', by = 'cluster_id', group_by = 'condition')
library(tidyverse)
# Get cluster frequencies per sample
freqs <- colData(sce) %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
group_by(sample_id, condition, cluster_id = cluster_ids(sce, 'meta20')) %>%
summarise(n = n(), .groups = 'drop') %>%
group_by(sample_id) %>%
mutate(freq = n / sum(n) * 100)
# Test each cluster
test_abundance <- function(df, cluster) {
cluster_data <- filter(df, cluster_id == cluster)
ctrl <- filter(cluster_data, condition == 'Control')$freq
treat <- filter(cluster_data, condition == 'Treatment')$freq
if (length(ctrl) >= 2 && length(treat) >= 2) {
test <- t.test(treat, ctrl)
return(data.frame(
cluster = cluster,
fc = mean(treat) / mean(ctrl),
pvalue = test$p.value
))
}
return(NULL)
}
results <- map_dfr(unique(freqs$cluster_id), ~test_abundance(freqs, .x))
results$padj <- p.adjust(results$pvalue, method = 'BH')
library(lme4)
library(lmerTest)
# For paired/repeated measures designs
# Random effect for patient/donor
fit_mixed <- function(df, cluster) {
cluster_data <- filter(df, cluster_id == cluster)
model <- lmer(freq ~ condition + (1|patient_id), data = cluster_data)
coef <- summary(model)$coefficients
return(data.frame(
cluster = cluster,
estimate = coef[2, 'Estimate'],
pvalue = coef[2, 'Pr(>|t|)']
))
}
library(citrus)
# Prepare data
fcs_files <- list.files('data', pattern = '\\.fcs$', full.names = TRUE)
labels <- c(rep('Control', 2), rep('Treatment', 2))
# Run CITRUS
citrus_result <- citrus(
fcs_files,
labels,
fileSampleSize = 1000,
featureType = 'abundances',
modelType = 'glmnet',
family = 'classification'
)
# Get significant clusters
citrus_plot(citrus_result)
library(ggplot2)
# From DA results
da_df <- as.data.frame(rowData(res_DA))
da_df$significant <- da_df$p_adj < 0.05
ggplot(da_df, aes(x = logFC, y = -log10(p_adj), color = significant)) +
geom_point() +
geom_hline(yintercept = -log10(0.05), linetype = 'dashed') +
geom_vline(xintercept = c(-1, 1), linetype = 'dashed') +
scale_color_manual(values = c('gray', 'red')) +
theme_bw() +
labs(title = 'Differential Abundance')
# Combine DA and DS results
da_results <- as.data.frame(rowData(res_DA))
da_results$analysis <- 'DA'
ds_results <- as.data.frame(rowData(res_DS))
ds_results$analysis <- 'DS'
# Save
write.csv(da_results, 'da_results.csv', row.names = FALSE)
write.csv(ds_results, 'ds_results.csv', row.names = FALSE)
# For multiple conditions
design_full <- model.matrix(~ 0 + condition, data = ei(sce))
colnames(design_full) <- levels(factor(ei(sce)$condition))
# Multiple contrasts
contrasts <- makeContrasts(
TreatA_vs_Ctrl = TreatmentA - Control,
TreatB_vs_Ctrl = TreatmentB - Control,
TreatA_vs_B = TreatmentA - TreatmentB,
levels = design_full
)
# Test each contrast
res_list <- lapply(1:ncol(contrasts), function(i) {
testDA_edgeR(sce, design_full, contrasts[, i], cluster_id = 'meta20')
})
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AlphaFold2 / AlphaFold-Multimer structure prediction for validation and confidence scoring. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm2-sequence-scoring. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Workflow for event-level and isoform-level splicing analysis with sashimi-ready outputs and splice QC.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
ATAC-seq processing with assay QC, MACS3 peak calling, consensus peak matrices, differential accessibility, and motif or footprint follow-up.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.