본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

skill-check

Validate Claude Code skills against the agentskills specification. Catches structural, semantic, and naming issues before users do.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

SkillCheck

Overview

Validate SKILL.md files against the agentskills specification and Anthropic best practices. Catches structural errors, semantic contradictions, naming anti-patterns, and quality gaps in a single read-only pass.

When to Use This Skill

  • Use when user says "check skill", "skillcheck", or "validate SKILL.md"
  • Use when reviewing a skill before publishing to a marketplace
  • Use when debugging why a skill doesn't trigger correctly
  • Use when onboarding a team to skill authoring standards
  • Do NOT use for anti-slop detection, security scanning, or token analysis; use SkillCheck Pro for those

How It Works

Step 1: Parse

Read the target SKILL.md file and extract YAML frontmatter.

Step 2: Validate

Apply all Free tier checks in order:

CategoryChecksWhat it catches
Structure (1.x)Name format, description WHAT+WHEN, allowed-tools, categories, XML injectionMalformed frontmatter, missing fields
Body (2.x)Line count, hardcoded paths, stale dates, empty sections, deprecated syntax, MCP tool qualificationContent quality issues
Naming (3.x)Vague terms, single-word names, gerund suggestionsPoor discoverability
Semantic (4.x)Contradictions, ambiguous terms, missing output format, wisdom/platitudes, misplaced triggersLogical inconsistencies
Quality (8.x)Examples, error handling, triggers, output format, prerequisites, negative triggersStrengths (positive patterns)

Step 3: Score

Calculate overall score (0-100). Penalties: critical = -20, warning = -5, suggestion = -1.

Step 4: Report

Return structured results: score, grade (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Poor), issue list with check IDs, line numbers, messages, and fix suggestions.

Examples

Example 1: Validating a skill

User: check my skill at ~/.claude/skills/weekly-report/SKILL.md

SkillCheck output:
## weekly-report Check Results [FREE]

Score: 85/100 (Good)

### Warnings (2)
  - 1.2-desc-when (line 3): Description missing WHEN clause
  - 4.5-desc-no-triggers (line 3): Description lacks triggering conditions

### Suggestions (1)
  - 3.4-gerund-naming (line 2): Skill name could use gerund form

### Passed Checks: 28

Example 2: Clean skill passes all checks

User: skillcheck ~/.claude/skills/processing-pdfs/SKILL.md

Score: 100/100 (Excellent)
All 31 checks passed. No issues found.

Limitations

  • Read-only: does not modify any files
  • Free tier covers structural, semantic, and naming checks only
  • Anti-slop, security, WCAG, token, enterprise, and workflow checks require SkillCheck Pro
  • Semantic checks (contradiction detection, wisdom/platitude) are heuristic with ~5% false positive rate
  • Does not validate referenced files or scripts; only checks SKILL.md content
  • Single-file validation; does not cross-check against other skills in the same directory

Best Practices

  • Run SkillCheck before submitting skills to any marketplace
  • Fix all critical and warning issues; suggestions are optional
  • Use the check ID (e.g., 1.2-desc-when) to find the exact rule in the skill body
  • Re-run after fixes to confirm the score improved

Common Pitfalls

  • Problem: Score seems low due to many suggestions Solution: Suggestions cap at -15 points total. Focus on warnings and criticals first.

  • Problem: False positive on ambiguous terms inside code blocks Solution: SkillCheck skips code blocks and inline code. If you still see false positives, wrap the term in backticks.

  • Problem: Wisdom/platitude check flags legitimate instructions Solution: Rephrase generic advice ("Remember that testing is important") as concrete directives ("Run tests before committing").

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

bouclem의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고