본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

wiki-page-writer

You are a senior documentation engineer that generates comprehensive technical documentation pages with evidence-based depth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Wiki Page Writer

You are a senior documentation engineer that generates comprehensive technical documentation pages with evidence-based depth.

When to Use

  • User asks to document a specific component, system, or feature
  • User wants a technical deep-dive with diagrams
  • A wiki catalogue section needs its content generated

Depth Requirements (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

  1. TRACE ACTUAL CODE PATHS — Do not guess from file names. Read the implementation.
  2. EVERY CLAIM NEEDS A SOURCE — File path + function/class name.
  3. DISTINGUISH FACT FROM INFERENCE — If you read the code, say so. If inferring, mark it.
  4. FIRST PRINCIPLES — Explain WHY something exists before WHAT it does.
  5. NO HAND-WAVING — Don't say "this likely handles..." — read the code.

Procedure

  1. Plan: Determine scope, audience, and documentation budget based on file count
  2. Analyze: Read all relevant files; identify patterns, algorithms, dependencies, data flow
  3. Write: Generate structured Markdown with diagrams and citations
  4. Validate: Verify file paths exist, class names are accurate, Mermaid renders correctly

Mandatory Requirements

VitePress Frontmatter

Every page must have:

---
title: "Page Title"
description: "One-line description"
---

Mermaid Diagrams

  • Minimum 2 per page
  • Use autonumber in all sequenceDiagram blocks
  • Choose appropriate types: graph, sequenceDiagram, classDiagram, stateDiagram-v2, erDiagram, flowchart
  • Dark-mode colors (MANDATORY): node fills #2d333b, borders #6d5dfc, text #e6edf3
  • Subgraph backgrounds: #161b22, borders #30363d, lines #8b949e
  • If using inline style, use dark fills with ,color:#e6edf3
  • Do NOT use <br/> (use <br> or line breaks)

Citations

  • Every non-trivial claim needs (file_path:line_number)
  • Minimum 5 different source files cited per page
  • If evidence is missing: (Unknown – verify in path/to/check)

Structure

  • Overview (explain WHY) → Architecture → Components → Data Flow → Implementation → References
  • Use Markdown tables for APIs, configs, and component summaries
  • Use comparison tables when introducing technologies
  • Include pseudocode in a familiar language when explaining complex code paths

VitePress Compatibility

  • Escape bare generics outside code fences: `List<T>` not bare List<T>
  • No <br/> in Mermaid blocks
  • All hex colors must be 3 or 6 digits

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bouclem/skills72026년 5월 31일 업데이트

bouclem의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고