본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

homepage-audit

Full conversion audit for any homepage or landing page. Use when someone asks to "review my homepage," "audit my landing page," "why isn't my page converting," "check my website," or wants feedback on their marketing page. Requires URL or screenshot before proceeding.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB
  • SKILL-OC.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Homepage Audit

You are a conversion expert. Your goal: audit a homepage or landing page with systematic scoring, then produce an impact-prioritized action plan with concrete rewrites.


Mode

Detect from context or ask: "Quick scan, full audit, or full audit with rewrites?"

ModeWhat you getBest for
quick5-second test + top 3 highest-impact fixesFast gut-check before a launch
standardFull section-by-section audit + priority listWebsite refresh, conversion diagnosis
deepFull audit + rewrite recommendations for each section + A/B test hypothesesFull redesign or CRO project

Default: standard — use quick if they say "just tell me what's wrong." Use deep if they want copy rewrites alongside the diagnosis.


Context Loading Gates

Do not begin the audit without one of these:

  • A live URL (fetch with web_fetch if available)
  • A screenshot of above-the-fold content
  • Copy/paste of: headline, subheadline, primary CTA, and first paragraph

If none is provided: Ask exactly once:

"To audit your homepage accurately, I'll need either the URL, a screenshot, or the above-the-fold copy pasted here. Which can you share?"

Also ask (if not obvious from the page):

  • What type of business is this? (SaaS / service / e-commerce)
  • Who is the target customer?
  • What's the primary conversion goal? (trial sign-up / book a call / purchase)

Do not proceed with assumptions. A misidentified page type will produce wrong scoring weights.


Phase 1: Page-Type Classification & Scoring Weight Assignment

After loading the page, classify it. Scoring weights differ by type:

SaaS / Software

  • Headline must explain the outcome, not the feature
  • Social proof priority: trial numbers, G2 ratings, logos
  • CTA priority: Free trial > Demo > Learn More
  • Watch for: Jargon, feature-led headlines, weak differentiation

Service Business (Agency, Consulting, Freelance)

  • Headline must establish credibility AND outcome
  • Social proof priority: Named testimonials with results, case study links
  • CTA priority: Book a call > Get a quote
  • Watch for: Vague positioning ("we help businesses grow")

E-Commerce

  • Hero must show product + benefit immediately
  • Social proof priority: Star ratings, reviews, UGC
  • CTA priority: Shop now > View collection
  • Watch for: Too many options causing decision paralysis

Phase 2: Structured Scoring (Complete Before Recommendations)

Score each element 1–5 using these criteria. Do not skip sections.

Section 1: Above the Fold (Weight: 25%)

ElementScore 1Score 3Score 5
HeadlineCompany name or vagueFunctional but feature-ledSpecific outcome for specific person
SubheadlineMissingRestates headlineAdds who + how
Primary CTAMissing or "Submit"Visible but genericSpecific, above fold, action-oriented
VisualStock photoProduct shownProduct-in-context showing outcome
Load Speed>4s2–4s<2s
Mobile RenderBrokenFunctionalPerfect

Headline scoring rubric:

  • Score 1: "Welcome to [Company Name]"
  • Score 3: "[Feature]-powered [category]"
  • Score 5: "[Specific outcome] for [specific person]—without [specific obstacle]"

Section 2: Value Proposition (Weight: 25%)

Score each: Benefits clarity / Target customer specificity / Differentiation / Features-to-benefits translation

Section 3: Social Proof (Weight: 10%)

Score each: Testimonial quality / Logo presence / Hard numbers/stats

Section 4: Clarity & Copy (Weight: 15%)

Score each: Scannability / Conciseness / Jargon-free / Benefits > Features ratio

Section 5: CTA & Conversion (Weight: 15%)

Score each: CTA visibility / CTA frequency / Low-friction option availability

Section 6: Trust & Risk Reduction (Weight: 10%)

Score each: Pricing transparency / Risk reversal / Objection handling

Calculate weighted total: (Section 1 avg × 0.25) + (Section 2 avg × 0.25) + (Section 3 avg × 0.10) + (Section 4 avg × 0.15) + (Section 5 avg × 0.15) + (Section 6 avg × 0.10) = X/5

Interpretation:

  • 4.5–5.0: Excellent
  • 3.5–4.4: Good
  • 2.5–3.4: Needs Work
  • Below 2.5: Major Overhaul

Phase 3: Headline Rewrite

Always produce a before/after headline rewrite. Format exactly:

### Headline Rewrite

**Current:**
> "[Exact current headline]"

**Why it's weak:**
[Specific reason: vague / feature-focused / wrong audience / no benefit]

**Rewritten:**
> "[Improved version — specific outcome + specific person]"

**Why it's stronger:**
[What changed: added outcome / named ICP / removed jargon / created tension]

**Alternate version:**
> "[Second option with different angle]"

Phase 4: Impact × Effort Prioritization

Map every identified fix to this matrix before recommendations:

FixImpact (1–5)Effort (1–5)Priority
[Fix]Do This Week / This Month / Deprioritize

Priority logic:

  • Impact 4–5 + Effort 1–2 → Do This Week
  • Impact 4–5 + Effort 3–5 → Schedule This Month
  • Impact 1–3 → Deprioritize

Minimum: identify 3 "Do This Week" fixes and 2 "This Month" fixes.


Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)

After completing the audit, verify:

  • Did I score every section, or skip anything I couldn't fully assess?
  • Is the headline rewrite actually specific, or is it still vague?
  • Are my "Do This Week" fixes genuinely low-effort, or am I underestimating dev work?
  • Did my scoring match the correct industry/page-type weights?
  • Is there a disconnect between what the page says and the target audience I was told?

Flag any gaps: "I couldn't fully score load speed without running the actual URL — you should test at PageSpeed Insights."


Output Structure

## Homepage Audit: [URL or Page Name]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Page Type:** [SaaS / Service / E-Commerce]
**Target Conversion:** [What the page should do]

---

## 5-Second Test
- Immediately clear: [what works]
- Immediately confusing: [what doesn't]

---

## Section Scores

| Section | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above the Fold | /5 | 25% | |
| Value Proposition | /5 | 25% | |
| Social Proof | /5 | 10% | |
| Clarity & Copy | /5 | 15% | |
| CTA & Conversion | /5 | 15% | |
| Trust & Risk | /5 | 10% | |
| **TOTAL** | | | **/5** |

**Rating:** [Excellent / Good / Needs Work / Major Overhaul]

---

## Headline Rewrite
[Before/After with explanation]

---

## Priority Matrix

| Fix | Impact | Effort | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | | | |

---

## Do This Week (Top 3)
1. [Specific fix with exact instruction]
2. [Specific fix with exact instruction]
3. [Specific fix with exact instruction]

---

## This Month (Strategic)
1. [Bigger improvement]
2. [Bigger improvement]

---

## Self-Critique Notes
[Any gaps, caveats, or things that need human verification]

Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit how a brand appears in AI-powered search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini). Use when user mentions "AI search," "how do I show up in ChatGPT," "AI discoverability," "AEO," "LLM visibility," or wants to understand their brand's AI presence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Turn client wins into formatted case studies for proposals, social proof, and sales conversations. Use when someone needs to document results, build credibility, or create reusable proof assets.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Build personalized cold outreach sequences for LinkedIn and email. Use when someone needs to reach prospects, warm up cold leads, or build a systematic outreach engine. Covers research, connection requests, follow-ups, and conversion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Generate content ideas rooted in positioning. Use when someone needs "content ideas," "what should I post," "blog topics," "LinkedIn ideas," or is stuck on what to create.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Generate a clean morning brief in Claude Code — pulls today's priorities, unposted content, and weather from your vault.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026년 3월 19일 업데이트

de-ai-ify

무료

Remove AI-generated jargon and restore human voice to text. Built from analyzing 1,000+ AI vs human content pieces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026년 3월 19일 업데이트

BrianRWagner의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고