본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

linkedin-authority-builder

Build a LinkedIn content system for thought leadership. Use when someone needs to establish authority, attract inbound leads, or build a consistent content presence. Covers positioning, content pillars, formats, and posting rhythm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

연동 도구LinkedIn
설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md7.6 KB
  • SKILL-OC.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

LinkedIn Authority Builder

Here's what most people get wrong about LinkedIn: they're trying to go viral.

Viral doesn't pay your bills. Being remembered by the right 500 people when they need what you do — that pays your bills.

This skill builds a content system around consistent positioning and clear pillars — not hacks.


Mode

Detect from context or ask: "Starter plan, full content system, or 90-day build?"

ModeWhat you getBest for
quick3 content pillars + 1-week posting starter planGetting unstuck, first week of consistency
standardFull content system: pillars, formats, posting rhythm + first week writtenBuilding a repeatable presence
deepFull system + 90-day calendar + 10 posts written + engagement playbookSerious authority-building campaign

Default: standard — use quick if they just need to start posting. Use deep if they're committing to LinkedIn as a growth channel.


Context Loading Gates

Before generating any strategy, load:

  • Current positioning: One-liner, ICP, key differentiator (load from positioning-basics output if available)
  • Target audience on LinkedIn: Specific titles, company stages, industries
  • Posting history: What have they tried? What worked? What didn't?
  • Content goals: Leads / job offers / speaking / partnerships / audience growth
  • Available time per week: Hours they can realistically commit

Sequencing gate: If positioning isn't clear yet, stop and ask:

"Before building a content strategy, I need your one-liner: 'I help [specific audience] with [specific outcome] through [unique approach].' Do you have this locked, or should we nail positioning first with positioning-basics?"

Do not build a content system for an unclear position — the content will be unfocused.

Also suggest:

"Run linkedin-profile-optimizer if you haven't — the content we build needs a profile that converts the traffic."


Phase 1: Positioning Alignment Analysis

Before recommending any content, reason through:

  1. Positioning check: Is the one-liner specific enough to anchor content pillars? If it's "I help businesses grow," that's too vague — push for specificity before proceeding.
  2. Audience clarity: Are we targeting a specific title + company stage, or a demographic? Specific is better.
  3. Time-to-output match: If they have 2 hours/week, don't recommend 5 posts/week. Sustainability matters more than ambition.
  4. Goal alignment: Content for lead generation looks different from content for speaking gigs. Confirm goal before building pillars.

Output a brief strategy assessment:

"You're a [role] targeting [audience] with [X hours/week] and a goal of [outcome]. I'll build a [3/5 post/week] strategy anchored to [X] pillars. The main gap in your current approach: [specific gap]."


Phase 2: Content Pillars (3–5 Required)

Each pillar must pass all 4 tests:

  1. You have genuine expertise (not just interest)
  2. Your target audience actively cares about it
  3. You can produce content on it consistently for 6+ months
  4. It connects to what you sell or want to be known for

Pillar ratio:

  • 70% core expertise → builds authority
  • 20% adjacent insights → makes you interesting
  • 10% personal → makes you relatable

Output format per pillar:

Pillar: [Name]
Ratio: [%]
Content types: [frameworks / stories / case studies]
Example hook: "[First line of a real post]"
Connection to goal: [how this drives the stated outcome]

Phase 3: Format Selection & Post Templates

Format-to-Goal Mapping

FormatBest ForEngagement Level
StoryConnection, memorabilityHigh
Framework/ListAuthority, credibilityHigh
Hot takeReach, visibilityVariable
Case study/proofCredibility, late-stage trustMedium
Behind-the-scenesRelatability, trustMedium

Recommended weekly mix:

  • 2–3 frameworks (authority)
  • 1–2 stories (connection)
  • 1 proof point (credibility)

Post Templates

Story Post:

[Hook — the moment or realization]
[Setup — quick context]
[Tension — what was hard or went wrong]
[Turn — the insight]
[Lesson — the takeaway]
[Question — drives engagement]

Framework Post:

[Hook — bold claim or problem statement]
[Why this matters — 1-2 sentences]
[The X-step framework:]
1. [Step + brief explanation]
2. [Step + brief explanation]
3. [Step + brief explanation]
[Key insight or summary]
[CTA or discussion question]

Hot Take:

[Controversial statement]
[Your reasoning — 2-3 sentences]
[The nuance people miss]
[What to do instead]
[Question to drive comments]

Phase 4: Content Calendar with Real Dates

Generate a 4-week calendar with actual dates (not generic day names):

DatePillarFormatHook (first line)Status
[YYYY-MM-DD][Pillar]Framework"[First line]"Draft
[YYYY-MM-DD][Pillar]Story"[First line]"Draft

Fill 4 full weeks. Generic "Week 1, Monday" output is not sufficient.

Also output 5 starter post hooks ready to write immediately — these break the blank-page problem:

1. [Hook]
2. [Hook]
3. [Hook]
4. [Hook]
5. [Hook]

Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)

After generating the strategy, evaluate:

  • Is the positioning one-liner specific enough to anchor the pillars?
  • Are the 5 starter hooks actually strong — would they stop the scroll?
  • Does the time commitment match the user's stated available hours?
  • Is at least one pillar directly tied to the revenue/goal outcome?
  • Does the calendar have actual dates, or just generic "Day 1/Day 3" placeholders?
  • Would this content system still work in 6 months if the user stays consistent?

Flag issues: "Pillar 3 ('general business tips') doesn't connect to your stated goal of attracting SaaS founders. Replace with something more specific."


Phase 6: 30-Day Iteration Protocol

After 30 days, review with these questions:

  • Which posts got the most comments? What pillar did they fall under?
  • Which posts drove DMs or profile views?
  • Which posts got the most impressions regardless of engagement?

Adjust based on data:

  • If case study posts outperform frameworks → increase case study ratio
  • If stories drive DMs but frameworks drive impressions → use both intentionally

Output Structure

## LinkedIn Strategy: [Name] — [Date]

### Positioning Alignment
[One-liner + assessment of clarity]

### Content Pillars
[3-5 pillars with ratio, examples, connection to goal]

### Weekly Rhythm
- Posts/week: [X]
- Best times: [e.g., Tue/Thu 8am EST]
- Active commenting: [X min/day]

### Format Mix
[Breakdown with rationale]

### 4-Week Content Calendar
[Table with real dates + hooks]

### 5 Starter Posts (Write These First)
[Hooks with format labels]

### Engagement Plan
[Who to engage with, how much time, what to say]

### Self-Critique Notes
[Issues flagged + recommended fixes]

### 30-Day Review Triggers
[What to measure and when to adjust]

### Cross-References
- linkedin-profile-optimizer (run before publishing)
- content-idea-generator (for ongoing idea generation)
- voice-extractor (to ensure posts sound authentic)

Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit how a brand appears in AI-powered search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini). Use when user mentions "AI search," "how do I show up in ChatGPT," "AI discoverability," "AEO," "LLM visibility," or wants to understand their brand's AI presence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4452026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Turn client wins into formatted case studies for proposals, social proof, and sales conversations. Use when someone needs to document results, build credibility, or create reusable proof assets.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4452026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Build personalized cold outreach sequences for LinkedIn and email. Use when someone needs to reach prospects, warm up cold leads, or build a systematic outreach engine. Covers research, connection requests, follow-ups, and conversion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4452026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Generate content ideas rooted in positioning. Use when someone needs "content ideas," "what should I post," "blog topics," "LinkedIn ideas," or is stuck on what to create.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4452026년 3월 19일 업데이트

Generate a clean morning brief in Claude Code — pulls today's priorities, unposted content, and weather from your vault.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4452026년 3월 19일 업데이트

de-ai-ify

무료

Remove AI-generated jargon and restore human voice to text. Built from analyzing 1,000+ AI vs human content pieces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4452026년 3월 19일 업데이트

BrianRWagner의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고