본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

osint-recon

Gather and correlate open source intelligence from public sources for authorized investigations, threat intelligence, and attack surface assessment. Use when the user mentions 'OSINT,' 'open source intelligence,' 'digital footprint,' 'public records,' 'threat intelligence,' 'investigate a domain,' or needs to research a target using publicly available data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

OSINT Recon — Open Source Intelligence Gathering

Systematically gather, analyze, and correlate publicly available information from open sources.

Cross-references: recon for the active/passive target-mapping pass against an authorized system (DNS, ports, fingerprinting) — osint-recon focuses on people, organizations, leaked data, and historical artifacts; the two pair naturally. breach-patterns for ingesting public breach intelligence into your own preemptive assessments. incident-triage if OSINT surfaces evidence the user is already compromised.

Ethics Check

Before proceeding, confirm:

  1. The investigation has a legitimate purpose (threat intel, authorized assessment, CTF, defensive research)
  2. You are only gathering publicly available information
  3. Results will not be used for harassment, stalking, or doxing

Refuse requests that target individuals for harassment or aggregate private information beyond what the objective requires.

Collection Techniques

Domain and Infrastructure OSINT

Run these to map a target's infrastructure:

whois <domain>                  # Registration data
dig any <domain>                # DNS records

Query certificate transparency for subdomains:

curl -s "https://crt.sh/?q=%25.<domain>&output=json" | jq -r '.[].name_value' | sort -u

Additional sources: SecurityTrails, DNSDumpster, ipinfo.io, bgp.he.net, Wayback Machine, Shodan, Censys.

Organization OSINT

  • Company registrations, filings, SEC records (public companies)
  • LinkedIn company page — employee count, roles, tech stack hints
  • Job postings — reveal internal tools, tech stack, pain points
  • Press releases and news articles
  • GitHub/GitLab organization pages and public repositories
  • Patent filings

Email and Username OSINT

  • Email format patterns (e.g., first.last@domain.com)
  • HaveIBeenPwned — check for breach exposure (check only, never distribute breach data)
  • PGP key servers for email discovery
  • Gravatar lookups for email-to-identity correlation

Document and File OSINT

  • Extract metadata from public documents: exiftool <file> reveals author, software, GPS, timestamps
  • Google dorking: site:<domain> filetype:pdf, site:<domain> filetype:xlsx
  • Pastebin and code paste site monitoring
  • Public cloud storage enumeration (S3 buckets, GCS buckets with predictable names)

Threat Intelligence

  • CVE databases for the target's technology stack
  • Exploit databases (exploit-db, searchsploit)
  • Threat feeds and IOC databases (VirusTotal, MalwareBazaar, OTX)
  • Abuse contact databases

Analysis

  • Cross-reference findings across multiple sources
  • Validate information with at least two independent sources
  • Build a timeline of events when investigating incidents
  • Map relationships between entities (people, domains, IPs, organizations)
  • Rate confidence: High (multiple corroborating sources), Medium (single reliable source), Low (unverified)

Output Format

# OSINT Report
## Objective: [what we're investigating and why]
## Target: [entity/domain/person]
## Date: [date]

### Collection Summary
| Source | Findings | Confidence |
|--------|----------|------------|

### Key Findings

#### Finding 1: [Title]
- **Source:** [where this was found]
- **Details:** [what was discovered]
- **Confidence:** High / Medium / Low
- **Relevance:** [why this matters to the objective]

### Correlations
[How different findings connect to each other]

### Intelligence Gaps
[What we couldn't find or verify]

### Recommendations
[Next steps and actionable intelligence]

Boundaries

  • Only use publicly available sources
  • Never attempt to access private or authenticated systems
  • Do not aggregate PII beyond what is necessary for the stated objective
  • Attribute all findings to their source
  • Rate confidence levels honestly — do not overstate certainty
  • If a finding could cause harm if misused, note the sensitivity
  • Refuse requests for doxing, stalking, or unauthorized surveillance

References

  • OSINT Framework (osintframework.com)
  • SANS OSINT resource list
  • Bellingcat Online Investigation Toolkit

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4282026년 5월 27일 업데이트

api-audit

무료

Audit REST, GraphQL, and RPC APIs against the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023). Use when the user mentions 'API security,' 'API audit,' 'BOLA,' 'broken object level authorization,' 'BFLA,' 'function-level authorization,' 'mass assignment,' 'API rate limiting,' 'GraphQL security,' 'REST security,' 'API authentication,' 'API authorization,' 'excessive data exposure,' or needs to review API endpoints for security weaknesses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4282026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Learn from public breach disclosures — extract the audit question each one implies and check your own stack. Capital One IMDS abuse, LastPass vault exfiltration, Okta Lapsus$, Snowflake credential reuse, MOVEit, SolarWinds, Equifax, Target POS, Codecov, Uber, Twilio — what would you check now if your boss said 'could that happen to us?' Use when the user mentions 'breach analysis,' 'lessons learned,' 'security postmortem,' 'breach patterns,' 'breach lessons,' 'has this happened to us,' 'apply breach lessons,' 'preempt breaches,' 'security retrospective,' 'real-world security incidents,' or wants to harden against known attacker playbooks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4282026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Audit cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, Azure) for misconfigurations, excessive permissions, and security gaps. Use when the user mentions 'cloud security,' 'cloud audit,' 'AWS security,' 'GCP security,' 'Azure security,' 'IAM audit,' 'S3 bucket,' 'cloud misconfiguration,' 'cloud hardening,' or needs to review cloud infrastructure security.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4282026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Audit container images, Dockerfiles, and Kubernetes manifests for misconfigurations, excessive privileges, exposed secrets, and runtime risks. Use when the user mentions 'container security,' 'Docker security,' 'Dockerfile audit,' 'Kubernetes security,' 'K8s security,' 'pod security,' 'container hardening,' 'kubectl audit,' 'image scanning,' 'distroless,' 'rootless containers,' 'pod security policy,' 'pod security standards,' 'PSS,' 'network policy,' 'OPA Gatekeeper,' 'Kyverno,' 'runtime security,' or needs to review container or orchestration security.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4282026년 5월 27일 업데이트

Audit cryptography implementation — algorithm choice, key sizes, KDF parameters, IV/nonce handling, signature verification, randomness, TLS configuration, and key rotation. Deeper than owasp-audit A02. Use when the user mentions 'crypto review,' 'cryptography audit,' 'encryption review,' 'KDF,' 'PBKDF2,' 'Argon2,' 'bcrypt cost,' 'IV reuse,' 'nonce reuse,' 'AES mode,' 'AES-GCM,' 'AES-ECB,' 'signature verification,' 'TLS configuration,' 'cipher suites,' 'key rotation,' 'libsodium,' 'BoringSSL,' or 'is this crypto right.'

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4282026년 5월 27일 업데이트

briiirussell의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고