본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

agent-identifier

Create and configure Claude Code agents using Markdown files with YAML configuration headers. Define when each agent should run, write its responsibilities and workflow, choose models and tools, and check configuration and triggering behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when creating or configuring Claude Code agents and their frontmatter.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Create a Claude Code subagent
  • Define triggering conditions with concrete examples
  • Configure an agent's model, color, and tools
  • Review agent definitions and test triggering

포함된 파일(7)

  • SKILL.md10.4 KB
  • examples/agent-creation-prompt.md9.2 KB
  • examples/complete-agent-examples.md13.8 KB
  • references/agent-creation-system-prompt.md8.7 KB
  • references/system-prompt-design.md9.8 KB
  • references/triggering-examples.md11.3 KB
  • scripts/validate-agent.sh5.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Agent Development for Claude Code Plugins

Overview

Agents are autonomous subprocesses that handle complex, multi-step tasks independently. Understanding agent structure, triggering conditions, and system prompt design enables creating powerful autonomous capabilities.

Key concepts:

  • Agents are FOR autonomous work, commands are FOR user-initiated actions
  • Markdown file format with YAML frontmatter
  • Triggering via description field with examples
  • System prompt defines agent behavior
  • Model and color customization

When to Use

Use this skill when the user asks to:

  • Create an agent
  • Add an agent
  • Write a subagent
  • Define agent frontmatter
  • Decide when to use description examples
  • Configure agent tools, colors, or model behavior
  • Design autonomous agent structure, triggering conditions, or system prompts

When Not to Use

Do not use this skill for:

  • Slash command design
  • Hook configuration
  • MCP server setup
  • General plugin layout questions that belong to plugin-structure

Agent File Structure

Complete Format

---
name: agent-identifier
description: Use this agent when [triggering conditions]. Examples:

<example>
Context: [Situation description]
user: "[User request]"
assistant: "[How assistant should respond and use this agent]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent should be triggered]
</commentary>
</example>

<example>
[Additional example...]
</example>

model: inherit
color: blue
tools: ["Read", "Write", "Grep"]
---

You are [agent role description]...

**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Responsibility 1]
2. [Responsibility 2]

**Analysis Process:**
[Step-by-step workflow]

**Output Format:**
[What to return]

Frontmatter Fields

name (required)

Agent identifier used for namespacing and invocation.

Format: lowercase, numbers, hyphens only Length: 3-50 characters Pattern: Must start and end with alphanumeric

Good examples:

  • code-reviewer
  • test-generator
  • api-docs-writer
  • security-analyzer

Bad examples:

  • helper (too generic)
  • -agent- (starts/ends with hyphen)
  • my_agent (underscores not allowed)
  • ag (too short, < 3 chars)

description (required)

Defines when Claude should trigger this agent. This is the most critical field.

Must include:

  1. Triggering conditions ("Use this agent when...")
  2. Multiple <example> blocks showing usage
  3. Context, user request, and assistant response in each example
  4. <commentary> explaining why agent triggers

Format:

Use this agent when [conditions]. Examples:

<example>
Context: [Scenario description]
user: "[What user says]"
assistant: "[How Claude should respond]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent is appropriate]
</commentary>
</example>

[More examples...]

Best practices:

  • Include 2-4 concrete examples
  • Show proactive and reactive triggering
  • Cover different phrasings of same intent
  • Explain reasoning in commentary
  • Be specific about when NOT to use the agent

model (required)

Which model the agent should use.

Options:

  • inherit - Use same model as parent (recommended)
  • sonnet - Claude Sonnet (balanced)
  • opus - Claude Opus (most capable, expensive)
  • haiku - Claude Haiku (fast, cheap)

Recommendation: Use inherit unless agent needs specific model capabilities.

color (required)

Visual identifier for agent in UI.

Options: blue, cyan, green, yellow, magenta, red

Guidelines:

  • Choose distinct colors for different agents in same plugin
  • Use consistent colors for similar agent types
  • Blue/cyan: Analysis, review
  • Green: Success-oriented tasks
  • Yellow: Caution, validation
  • Red: Critical, security
  • Magenta: Creative, generation

tools (optional)

Restrict agent to specific tools.

Format: Array of tool names

tools: ["Read", "Write", "Grep", "Bash"]

Default: If omitted, agent has access to all tools

Best practice: Limit tools to minimum needed (principle of least privilege)

Common tool sets:

  • Read-only analysis: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob"]
  • Code generation: ["Read", "Write", "Grep"]
  • Testing: ["Read", "Bash", "Grep"]
  • Full access: Omit field or use ["*"]

System Prompt Design

The markdown body becomes the agent's system prompt. Write in second person, addressing the agent directly.

Structure

Standard template:

You are [role] specializing in [domain].

**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Primary responsibility]
2. [Secondary responsibility]
3. [Additional responsibilities...]

**Analysis Process:**
1. [Step one]
2. [Step two]
3. [Step three]
[...]

**Quality Standards:**
- [Standard 1]
- [Standard 2]

**Output Format:**
Provide results in this format:
- [What to include]
- [How to structure]

**Edge Cases:**
Handle these situations:
- [Edge case 1]: [How to handle]
- [Edge case 2]: [How to handle]

Best Practices

✅ DO:

  • Write in second person ("You are...", "You will...")
  • Be specific about responsibilities
  • Provide step-by-step process
  • Define output format
  • Include quality standards
  • Address edge cases
  • Keep under 10,000 characters

❌ DON'T:

  • Write in first person ("I am...", "I will...")
  • Be vague or generic
  • Omit process steps
  • Leave output format undefined
  • Skip quality guidance
  • Ignore error cases

Creating Agents

Method 1: AI-Assisted Generation

Use this prompt pattern (extracted from Claude Code):

Create an agent configuration based on this request: "[YOUR DESCRIPTION]"

Requirements:
1. Extract core intent and responsibilities
2. Design expert persona for the domain
3. Create comprehensive system prompt with:
   - Clear behavioral boundaries
   - Specific methodologies
   - Edge case handling
   - Output format
4. Create identifier (lowercase, hyphens, 3-50 chars)
5. Write description with triggering conditions
6. Include 2-3 <example> blocks showing when to use

Return JSON with:
{
  "identifier": "agent-name",
  "whenToUse": "Use this agent when... Examples: <example>...</example>",
  "systemPrompt": "You are..."
}

Then convert to agent file format with frontmatter.

See examples/agent-creation-prompt.md for complete template.

Method 2: Manual Creation

  1. Choose agent identifier (3-50 chars, lowercase, hyphens)
  2. Write description with examples
  3. Select model (usually inherit)
  4. Choose color for visual identification
  5. Define tools (if restricting access)
  6. Write system prompt with structure above
  7. Save as agents/agent-name.md

Validation Rules

Identifier Validation

✅ Valid: code-reviewer, test-gen, api-analyzer-v2
❌ Invalid: ag (too short), -start (starts with hyphen), my_agent (underscore)

Rules:

  • 3-50 characters
  • Lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens only
  • Must start and end with alphanumeric
  • No underscores, spaces, or special characters

Description Validation

Length: 10-5,000 characters Must include: Triggering conditions and examples Best: 200-1,000 characters with 2-4 examples

System Prompt Validation

Length: 20-10,000 characters Best: 500-3,000 characters Structure: Clear responsibilities, process, output format

Agent Organization

Plugin Agents Directory

plugin-name/
└── agents/
    ├── analyzer.md
    ├── reviewer.md
    └── generator.md

All .md files in agents/ are auto-discovered.

Namespacing

Agents are namespaced automatically:

  • Single plugin: agent-name
  • With subdirectories: plugin:subdir:agent-name

Testing Agents

Test Triggering

Create test scenarios to verify agent triggers correctly:

  1. Write agent with specific triggering examples
  2. Use similar phrasing to examples in test
  3. Check Claude loads the agent
  4. Verify agent provides expected functionality

Test System Prompt

Ensure system prompt is complete:

  1. Give agent typical task
  2. Check it follows process steps
  3. Verify output format is correct
  4. Test edge cases mentioned in prompt
  5. Confirm quality standards are met

Quick Reference

Minimal Agent

---
name: simple-agent
description: Use this agent when... Examples: <example>...</example>
model: inherit
color: blue
---

You are an agent that [does X].

Process:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]

Output: [What to provide]

Frontmatter Fields Summary

FieldRequiredFormatExample
nameYeslowercase-hyphenscode-reviewer
descriptionYesText + examplesUse when... <example>...
modelYesinherit/sonnet/opus/haikuinherit
colorYesColor nameblue
toolsNoArray of tool names["Read", "Grep"]

Best Practices

DO:

  • ✅ Include 2-4 concrete examples in description
  • ✅ Write specific triggering conditions
  • ✅ Use inherit for model unless specific need
  • ✅ Choose appropriate tools (least privilege)
  • ✅ Write clear, structured system prompts
  • ✅ Test agent triggering thoroughly

DON'T:

  • ❌ Use generic descriptions without examples
  • ❌ Omit triggering conditions
  • ❌ Give all agents same color
  • ❌ Grant unnecessary tool access
  • ❌ Write vague system prompts
  • ❌ Skip testing

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed guidance, consult:

  • references/system-prompt-design.md - Complete system prompt patterns
  • references/triggering-examples.md - Example formats and best practices
  • references/agent-creation-system-prompt.md - The exact prompt from Claude Code

Example Files

Working examples in examples/:

  • agent-creation-prompt.md - AI-assisted agent generation template
  • complete-agent-examples.md - Full agent examples for different use cases

Utility Scripts

Development tools in scripts/:

  • validate-agent.sh - Validate agent file structure
  • test-agent-trigger.sh - Test if agent triggers correctly

Implementation Workflow

To create an agent for a plugin:

  1. Define agent purpose and triggering conditions
  2. Choose creation method (AI-assisted or manual)
  3. Create agents/agent-name.md file
  4. Write frontmatter with all required fields
  5. Write system prompt following best practices
  6. Include 2-4 triggering examples in description
  7. Validate with scripts/validate-agent.sh
  8. Test triggering with real scenarios
  9. Document agent in plugin README

Focus on clear triggering conditions and comprehensive system prompts for autonomous operation.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고