본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

daily-paper-generator

Find recent arXiv papers on EEG, or brainwave, decoding and brain-computer interfaces. Evaluate candidates using five quality criteria, select the top three, and save structured Chinese and English reviews with paper metadata as Markdown files.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when the user asks to "generate daily paper", "search arXiv for EEG papers", "find EEG decoding papers", "review brain-computer interface papers", or wants to create paper summaries for EEG/brain decoding/speech decoding research. This skill automates searching arXiv for recent papers on EEG decoding, EEG speech decoding, or brain foundation models, reviewing paper quality, and generating structured Chinese/English summaries.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Tracking recent EEG decoding papers
  • Finding research on speech decoding from EEG
  • Comparing brain foundation model papers
  • Preparing Chinese and English paper reviews

포함된 파일(6)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • example/daily paper example.md6.1 KB
  • references/keywords.md1.9 KB
  • references/quality-criteria.md4.0 KB
  • references/writing-style.md4.6 KB
  • scripts/arxiv_search.py4.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Daily Paper Generator

Overview

Automate the workflow of discovering, reviewing, and summarizing recent research papers on arXiv related to EEG decoding, brain-computer interfaces, and neural foundation models.

Core workflow:

  1. Search arXiv for recent papers (within 3 months) using Chrome browser
  2. Retrieve paper metadata from arXiv pages
  3. Evaluate paper quality using structured criteria
  4. Select top 3 papers
  5. Generate structured summaries with Chinese and English reviews
  6. Save results as Markdown files in daily paper/ directory

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • User asks to "generate daily paper" or "find recent EEG papers"
  • User wants to discover research on EEG decoding, speech decoding from EEG, or brain foundation models
  • User needs paper reviews with both Chinese and English summaries
  • User wants to track recent arXiv publications in neuro/AI intersection

Output Format

Each paper summary follows this structure (see example/daily paper example.md for complete example):

1. Header Section

# Paper Title

## 作者及单位
Author list
Institution

## arXiv 链接
https://arxiv.org/abs/ARXIV_ID

**发表日期**: YYYY-MM-DD
**arXiv ID**: XXXX.XXXXX
**分类**: cs.LG, q-bio.NC, eess.SP

2. Review Sections

中文评语 (~300 words):

  • Background (1-2 sentences): Research context and importance
  • Challenges (2-3 sentences): Problems with existing methods
  • Contribution (1-2 sentences): Core contribution of this work
  • Method (2-3 sentences): Key technical details
  • Results (2-3 sentences): Main findings and metrics
  • Analysis & Limitations (1-2 sentences): Significance and limitations

English Review (fluent academic English):

  • Concise summary following the same structure as Chinese review
  • Use natural academic prose (avoid AI-like patterns)
  • Apply scientific writing best practices

3. Main Figure Section

## 主图
[预留论文主图位置]

4. Metadata Table

## 论文元数据

| 项目 | 内容 |
|------|------|
| **标题** | Paper Title |
| **第一作者** | First Author Name |
| **作者列表** | Full author list |
| **第一作者单位** | Institution |
| **发表日期** | YYYY-MM-DD |
| **arXiv 链接** | https://arxiv.org/abs/ID |
| **PDF 链接** | https://arxiv.org/pdf/ID |
| **分类** | cs.LG, q-bio.NC, eess.SP |

5. Integrated Format (for publishing)

## 整合格式

Daily Paper MMDD

Paper Title

https://arxiv.org/abs/ARXIV_ID

[Chinese Review]

[English Review]

6. Appendix

## 附录

**github连接:** [Available/Not Available]

**补充说明**

[Key insights, impact points]

**Sources:**
- [arXiv Abstract](URL)
- [arXiv HTML](URL)
- [Paperverse Review](URL) (if available)

Quick Reference

TaskMethod
Search arXivUse Chrome MCP tools (chrome-mcp-helper)
Get paper detailsNavigate to arXiv pages and extract metadata
Evaluate qualityUse criteria in references/quality-criteria.md
Write Chinese reviewFollow style in references/writing-style.md
Write English reviewApply scientific-writing skill best practices
Create outputUse template in example/daily paper example.md

Workflow

Step 1: Search arXiv Using Chrome

Search keywords (see references/keywords.md for full list):

  • EEG decoding: EEG decoding, brain decoding, neural decoding
  • Speech decoding: speech decoding from EEG, EEG speech reconstruction
  • Foundation models: EEG foundation model, large EEG model, brain foundation model

Method: Use Chrome browser with arXiv search

  1. Navigate to arXiv search using Chrome MCP tools:

    • URL: https://arxiv.org/search/
    • Add search parameters: ?searchtype=all&query=KEYWORDS&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first
  2. Search URL pattern:

    https://arxiv.org/search/?searchtype=all&query=EEG+decoding&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first
    https://arxiv.org/search/?searchtype=all&query=EEG+foundation+model&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first
    
  3. Time filtering: Use date filters or sort by announced_date_first to get recent papers

  4. Extract paper information from search results:

    • Paper title
    • Authors
    • arXiv ID
    • Abstract preview
    • Publication date

Step 2: Retrieve Paper Details

For each candidate paper, navigate to its arXiv abs page and extract:

URL pattern: https://arxiv.org/abs/ARXIV_ID

Extract from page:

  • Title (from <h1> tag)
  • Authors (from .authors element)
  • Abstract (from blockquote.abstract)
  • Submission date (from .dateline)
  • arXiv ID (from URL or page)
  • Categories (from .subjects)
  • Comments (if present)
  • First author institution (if available in comments or author affiliations)

Step 3: Evaluate Paper Quality

Review each paper using the 5-dimension criteria in references/quality-criteria.md:

DimensionWeightKey Points
Innovation30%Novelty of contribution
Method Completeness25%Clarity and reproducibility
Experimental Thoroughness25%Validation depth
Writing Quality10%Clarity of expression
Relevance & Impact10%Domain importance

Scoring: Rate each dimension 1-5, calculate weighted sum.

Process:

  1. Screen by title/abstract for relevance
  2. Navigate to full paper page for detailed review
  3. Score each dimension
  4. Rank by total score
  5. Select top 3

Step 4: Generate Paper Summaries

For each selected paper, create a summary following the structure in example/daily paper example.md:

Required sections:

  1. Title (H1 heading)
  2. 作者及单位 (Authors and Institution)
  3. arXiv 链接 (with metadata: date, ID, categories)
  4. 中文评语 (Chinese review, ~300 words)
  5. English Review (fluent academic English)
  6. 主图 (placeholder for main figure)
  7. 论文元数据 (metadata table)
  8. 整合格式 (integrated format for publishing)
  9. 附录 (appendix with github link,补充说明, sources)

Writing Chinese review (see references/writing-style.md):

  • Background: 研究背景和重要性
  • Challenges: 现有方法的不足
  • Contribution: 本工作的核心贡献
  • Method: 关键技术细节
  • Results: 主要发现和指标
  • Analysis & Limitations: 意义和局限性

Writing English review:

  • Apply scientific-writing skill best practices
  • Use anti-AI writing principles (natural, varied sentence structure)
  • Keep concise and direct
  • Avoid formulaic transitions ("furthermore", "moreover", "additionally")

Step 5: Save Output

Create Markdown files in the daily paper/ directory:

daily paper/
├── 2025-01-26-1430-paper-1.md
├── 2025-01-26-1430-paper-2.md
└── 2025-01-26-1430-paper-3.md

Filename format: YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-paper-N.md

Important: 使用时间戳(精确到分钟)避免覆盖之前生成的文件。

Example Output

See example/daily paper example.md for a complete example of the DeeperBrain paper summary with all sections properly formatted.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/keywords.md - Complete search keyword list and arXiv URL patterns
  • references/quality-criteria.md - Detailed 5-dimension evaluation criteria with scoring rubrics
  • references/writing-style.md - Chinese review structure, templates, and example analysis

Example Files

  • example/daily paper example.md - Complete output example with all sections
  • scripts/arxiv_search.py - Legacy Python script (deprecated, use Chrome instead)

Chrome MCP Tools

Use Chrome MCP tools for browser automation:

  • Navigation: Open arXiv search and paper pages
  • Screenshot: Capture pages for analysis
  • Tabs: Manage multiple arXiv pages
  • Content extraction: Parse paper metadata from HTML

Important Notes

  1. Time range: Search focuses on papers from the last 3 months (check submission dates)
  2. Link format: Use arXiv abs page links (https://arxiv.org/abs/ID), not direct PDF links
  3. Review length: Chinese reviews should be approximately 300 words
  4. Quality focus: Prioritize content quality (innovation, method, experiments) over quantitative metrics
  5. Bilingual output: Both Chinese and English reviews are required for each paper
  6. Chrome required: This workflow uses Chrome browser automation via MCP tools
  7. Complete format: Ensure all 9 sections are included in each summary
  8. Consistent naming: Use Daily Paper MMDD format in integrated section

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고